The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Carbon Pricing: Effectiveness and Equity
Open accessAbstract
The 2015 Paris Agreement adopted the goal of limiting the rise in global mean temperature to 1.5–2 °C above pre-industrial levels. Carbon pricing can play a key role in meeting this objective. A cap-and-permit system, or alternatively a carbon tax indexed to a fixed emission-reduction trajectory, not only can spur cost-effective mitigation and cost-reducing innovation, but also, crucially, can ensure that emissions are held to the target level. The carbon prices needed to meet this constraint are likely to be considerably higher, however, than existing prices and conventional measures of the social cost of carbon. This poses issues of distributional equity and political sustainability that can be addressed by universal dividends funded by carbon revenues.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2014) · doi:10.59327/ipcc/ar5-9789291691432 · Cited by 5,217
The entrepreneurial state: debunking public vs. private sector myths
(2014) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.51-3359 · Cited by 2,297
On Modeling and Interpreting the Economics of Catastrophic Climate Change
Weitzman, M. L. (2009) · Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest.91.1.1 · Cited by 1,791 · cited 2×
“…to calculate expected utility, is deeply problematic in the presence of catastrophic risks whose probability and magnitude are both unknown, as is the treatment of risk aversion and ambiguity aversion (Ingham and Ulph, 2005; Weitzman, 2007, 2009, 2011; Millnar et al., 2013; Ackerman, 2017).”
BackgroundA Review of the Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change
Nordhaus, W. D. (2007) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.45.3.686 · Cited by 1,735
Revisiting the social cost of carbon
Nordhaus, W. D. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1609244114 · Cited by 1,366
Environmental Policy and Directed Technological Change: Evidence from the European Carbon Market
Calel, R., & Dechezleprêtre, A. (2016) · Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest_a_00470 · Cited by 1,147
A Review of the Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change
Weitzman, M. L. (2007) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.45.3.703 · Cited by 1,024 · cited 1×
“…to calculate expected utility, is deeply problematic in the presence of catastrophic risks whose probability and magnitude are both unknown, as is the treatment of risk aversion and ambiguity aversion (Ingham and Ulph, 2005; Weitzman, 2007, 2009, 2011; Millnar et al., 2013; Ackerman, 2017).”
BackgroundClimate Change Policy: What Do the Models Tell Us?
Pindyck, R. S. (2013) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.51.3.860 · Cited by 946
Science and policy characteristics of the Paris Agreement temperature goal
Schleussner, C.-F., Rogelj, J., Schaeffer, M., Lissner, T., Licker, R., Fischer, E. M., Knutti, R., Levermann, A., Frieler, K., & Hare, W. (2016) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate3096 · Cited by 898
Energy system transformations for limiting end-of-century warming to below 1.5 °C
Rogelj, J., Luderer, G., Pietzcker, R. C., Kriegler, E., Schaeffer, M., Krey, V., & Riahi, K. (2015) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate2572 · Cited by 875
Cited by
Are the current expectations for growing air travel demand realistic?
Becken, S., & Carmignani, F. (2020) · Annals of Tourism Research · doi:10.1016/j.annals.2019.102840 · Cited by 29
The Ethics of Alternative Currencies
Larue, L., Meyer, C., Hudon, M., & Sandberg, J. (2022) · Business Ethics Quarterly · doi:10.1017/beq.2021.52 · Cited by 23
“This is, in essence, similar to the better-known carbon pricing programs for businesses (Boyce 2018), but here managed and applied at the level of citizens rather than companies or states.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Boyce, J. K.
- Venue
- Ecological Economics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-08
- Volume
- 150
- Pages
- 52-61
- ISSN
- 0921-8009 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2801290469
- Cited by
- 298
- References
- 57
- FWCI
- 29.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Carbon Pricing: Effectiveness and Equity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.03.030
- The paper
- Boyce, J. K. (2018). Carbon Pricing: Effectiveness and Equity. Ecological Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.03.030
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
