The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Impact of Social Awareness and Lifestyles on Household Carbon Emissions in China
Abstract
Abstract Household carbon emissions account for a significant proportion of the national total emissions. Using a unique nation-wide survey data, this paper investigates the impact of different subjective measures of social awareness on household carbon emissions in China. Subjective variables are found to have significant impacts on household carbon emissions. Feeling secure, compliance with rules, and happiness have negative and significant effects on household carbon emissions, whereas the impact of interest in social issues is positive, which indicates the existence of a gap between awareness and behavior. The impacts of consumer lifestyles on the relationship between awareness and household emissions are also explored and are found to play a significant role in the relationship between awareness and emissions. People with a frugal lifestyle not only associate with lower emissions but also reinforce the role of social awareness. Furthermore, substantial differences are found across rural/urban areas and regional and income groups in China. The government should further promote a green lifestyle and give households more incentives to engage in green consumption behavior.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1914185 · Cited by 48,524
Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1988) · Decision, Probability and Utility · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511609220.014 · Cited by 32,474
(1980) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 25,810
Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002) · Environmental Education Research · doi:10.1080/13504620220145401 · Cited by 8,866
(2014) · doi:10.59327/ipcc/ar5-9789291691432 · Cited by 5,217
Environmental segmentation alternatives: a look at green consumer behavior in the new millennium
Straughan, R. D., & Roberts, J. A. (1999) · Journal of Consumer Marketing · doi:10.1108/07363769910297506 · Cited by 1,611
Income Smoothing and Consumption Smoothing
Morduch, J. (1995) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.9.3.103 · Cited by 1,435
Blake, J. (1999) · Local Environment · doi:10.1080/13549839908725599 · Cited by 1,289
Brown, K. W., & Kasser, T. (2005) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s11205-004-8207-8 · Cited by 1,098
The link between green purchasing decisions and measures of environmental consciousness
Schlegelmilch, B. B., Bohlen, G. M., & Diamantopoulos, A. (1996) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/03090569610118740 · Cited by 1,035
Cited by
Emission reduction effect and carbon market efficiency of carbon emissions trading policy in China
Zhang, W., Li, J., Li, G., & Guo, S. (2020) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2020.117117 · Cited by 497
Self-citationDu, M., Zhang, X., Xia, L., Cao, L., Zhang, Z., Zhang, L., Zheng, H., & Cai, B. (2022) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2021.111825 · Cited by 58
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, J., Zhang, D., & Su, B.
- Venue
- Ecological Economics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-06
- Volume
- 160
- Pages
- 145-155
- ISSN
- 0921-8009 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2919380282
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 53
- FWCI
- 37.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Impact of Social Awareness and Lifestyles on Household Carbon Emissions in China. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.02.020
- The paper
- Li, J., Zhang, D., & Su, B. (2019). The Impact of Social Awareness and Lifestyles on Household Carbon Emissions in China. Ecological Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.02.020
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
