Human agency in the Anthropocene
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Coupled global-scale, socio-ecological models are emerging as tools to account for a full range of human decision-making processes, beyond economic factors alone.
“Coupled global-scale, socio-ecological models are emerging as tools to account for a full range of human decision-making processes, beyond economic factors alone (146).”
From Restoring Degraded Lands (2021) · cites this paper as [146]
The available passages labeled Abstract contain bibliographic details and keywords, including “Human agency” and “Integrated assessment models,” but no substantive discussion of what the models account for. Searches for coupled socio-ecological models, decision-making processes, and economic factors found no passage that verifies the claim. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 114 · Cited by 121
- Authors
- Otto, I. M., Wiedermann, M., Cremades, R., Donges, J. F., Auer, C., & Lucht, W.
- Affiliations
- Leibniz Association (DE)
- Climate Service Center (DE)
- Stockholm Resilience Centre (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Otto, Ilona M.
- Venue
- Ecological Economics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-01
- Volume
- 167
- Pages
- 106463
- ISSN
- 0921-8009 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2982218463
- Cited by
- 121
- References
- 114
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 6.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- research.wur.nl
- Locations
- Ecological Economics (publishedVersion)
- Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Publication Database PIK (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK)) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Earth League
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Realism in Sociology
- Keywords
- human agency, Anthropocene, collective agency, strategic agency, social structure, integrated assessment modelling, fossil fuel consumption, market coordination
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
