Cited by 309Urban Stormwater Management SolutionsSoil and Water Nutrient DynamicsWastewater Treatment and Reuse

Opportunities and challenges for managing nitrogen in urban stormwater: A review and synthesis

Collins, Kelly A., Lawrence, Timothy J., Stander, Emilie K., Jontos, Robert J., Kaushal, Sujay S., Newcomer, Tamara A., Grimm, Nancy B., Cole Ekberg, Marci L.·2010·Ecological Engineering

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2010.03.015

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Small, low-cost, widely-distributed, parcel scale projects (i.e., 'source-control') such as vegetated swales, green streets, porous or permeable pavement, can provide stormwater control equivalent to or more effective than large centralized projects when properly sized and located.

    “Small, low-cost, widely-distributed, parcel scale projects (i.e.,”
  • Traditional stormwater systems do not always adequately address the rate of stormwater flow and quality, leading to continued problems with erosion and water pollution.

    “However, these traditional systems do not always adequately address the rate of stormwater flow and quality, leading to continued problems with erosion and water pollution (Collins et al. 2010;Cappiella et al. 2012).”
  • Ditches, pipes, swales, and large dry or wet detention basins, when installed by developers during construction, are relatively low cost and dependable approaches for reducing flooding issues that impact people and property.

    “Ditches, pipes, swales, and large dry or wet detention basins, when installed by developers during construction, are relatively low cost and dependable approaches for reducing flooding issues that impact people and property (Collins et al. 2010;Brown 2013;Cettner et al. 2013;Hale 2016).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Collins, K. A., Lawrence, T. J., Stander, E. K., Jontos, R. J., Kaushal, S. S., Newcomer, T. A., Grimm, N. B., & Cole Ekberg, M. L.
Affiliations
  • Washington State University (US)
  • Environmental Protection Agency (US)
  • IBM (United States) (US)
  • University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science (US)
  • Arizona State University (US)
Corresponding author
Collins, Kelly A.
Venue
Ecological Engineering
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-11
Volume
36
Issue
11
Pages
1507-1519
ISSN
0925-8574 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2018814317
Cited by
309
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 16
FWCI
12.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Ecological Engineering (publishedVersion)
Funders
McGill University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
Keywords
nitrogen removal, urban stormwater, stormwater control measures, denitrification, plant nitrogen uptake, bioretention, constructed wetlands, wet ponds, dry ponds, nitrate, phosphorus, total suspended solids, carbon source, design criteria

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review