Cited by 46Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removalCoagulation and Flocculation StudiesHeavy Metal Pollution Remediation

Chromium and cobalt sequestration using exopolysaccharides produced by freshwater cyanobacterium Nostoc linckia

Mona, Sharma, Kaushik, Anubha·2015·Ecological Engineering

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.04.037

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mona, S., & Kaushik, A.
Affiliations
  • Amity University (IN)
  • Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University (IN)
Corresponding author
Kaushik, Anubha
Venue
Ecological Engineering
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-09
Volume
82
Pages
121-125
ISSN
0925-8574 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W238195277
Cited by
46
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2016: 1
FWCI
1.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Ecological Engineering (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Coagulation and Flocculation Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Heavy Metal Pollution Remediation
Keywords
chromium(VI) biosorption, exopolysaccharides, Nostoc linckia, cyanobacteria, heavy metal removal, adsorption kinetics, pseudo-second-order kinetics, Langmuir isotherm, pH effect on adsorption, freshwater cyanobacteria

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review