Evaluation of quantitative indicators for marine fish communities
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Given its distinct annual and spatial trends in Chesapeake Bay and emphasis on biomass-dominant species, total fish CPUE (as an index of demersal fish biomass) appears to be a useful ecosystem indicator.
“Given its distinct annual and spatial trends in Chesapeake Bay and emphasis on biomass-dominant species, total fish CPUE (as an index of demersal fish biomass) appears to be a useful ecosystem indicator as suggested by many authors in other systems (e.g.Rice 2000, Methratta & Link 2006).”
From Patterns and drivers of the demersal fish community of Chesapeake Bay (2013) · cites this paper as Methratta & Link 2006
Cites
Pauly, D., Christensen, V., Dalsgaard, J., Froese, R., & Torres, F. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.279.5352.860 · Cited by 4,743 · see citing works
Decision support system for the sustainable forest management
Varma, V. K., Ferguson, I., & Wild, I. (2000) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-1127(99)00271-6 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Patterns and drivers of the demersal fish community of Chesapeake Bay
Buchheister, A., Bonzek, C., Gartland, J., & Latour, R. (2013) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps10253 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
- Authors
- METHRATTA, E., & LINK, J.
- Affiliations
- NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service (US)
- Corresponding author
- METHRATTA, E
- ORCID
- Venue
- Ecological Indicators
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-08
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 575-588
- ISSN
- 1470-160X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2004037061
- Cited by
- 93
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 4.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Ecological Indicators (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Fogarty International Center
- Northeast Fisheries Science Center
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Coastal and Marine Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
- Keywords
- ecosystem indicators, marine fish communities, ecosystem-based fisheries management, ecological status assessment, fishing pressure, large marine ecosystems, indicator redundancy, ecological monitoring
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
