The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Relationships among carbon emissions, economic growth, energy consumption and population growth: Testing Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis for Brazil, China, India and Indonesia
Open accessAbstract
This study examines the impacts of income, energy consumption and population growth on CO2 emissions by employing an annual time series data for the period 1970–2012 for India, Indonesia, China, and Brazil. The study used the Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) bounds test approach considering both the linear and non-linear assumptions for related time series data for the top CO2 emitter emerging countries in both the short run and long run. The results show that CO2 emissions have increased statistically significantly with increases in income and energy consumption in all four countries. While the relationship between CO2 emissions and population growth was found to be statistically significant for India and Brazil, it has been statistically insignificant for China and Indonesia in both the short run and long run. Also, empirical observations from the testing of environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis imply that in the cases of Brazil, China and Indonesia, CO2 emissions will decrease over the time when income increases. So based on the EKC findings, it can be argued that these three countries should not take any actions or policies, which might have conservative impacts on income, in order to reduce their CO2 emissions. But in the case of India, where CO2 emissions and income were found to have a positive relationship, an increase in income over the time will not reduce CO2 emissions in the country.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation and testing
Engle, R. F., & Granger, C. W. J. (1987) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1913236 · Cited by 32,007
Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships
Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. J. (2001) · Journal of Applied Econometrics · doi:10.1002/jae.616 · Cited by 20,385
Financial Development and Economic Growth: The Case of Pakistan
Khan, M. A., Qayyum, A., & Sheikh, S. A. (2005) · The Pakistan Development Review · doi:10.30541/v44i4iipp.819-837 · Cited by 166
Cited by
ICT, total factor productivity, and carbon dioxide emissions in Tunisia
Amri, F., Zaied, Y. B., & Lahouel, B. B. (2019) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2019.05.028 · Cited by 272
Amri, F. (2018) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-018-3331-1 · Cited by 208
Murshed, M., Ahmed, Z., Alam, M. S., Mahmood, H., Rehman, A., & Dagar, V. (2021) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-021-15352-w · Cited by 179
Self-citationEnergy Consumption and Foreign Direct Investment Inflows in Nigeria: An Empirical Perspective
Olaoye, O. P., Aderemi, T. A., John, N. C., Jude-Okeke, Y., & Ezinwa, A. D. (2020) · International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy · doi:10.32479/ijeep.8489 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Alam, M. M., Murad, M. W., Noman, A. H. M., & Ozturk, I.
- Venue
- Ecological Indicators
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-11
- Volume
- 70
- Pages
- 466-479
- ISSN
- 1470-160X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2460664401
- Cited by
- 735
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 101.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.