Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 533

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A new remote sensing index for assessing the spatial heterogeneity in urban ecological quality: A case from Fuzhou City, China

Hu, Xisheng, Xu, Hanqiu·2018·Ecological Indicators

Abstract

Abstract Remote sensing is unique in its ability to record a variety of spatial and temporal data on land surfaces with complete coverage, especially at larger spatial scales, and it has been shown to be effective for rapidly recognizing spatio-temporal changes in regional eco-environments. This paper is the first to introduce a new remote sensing-based ecological index (RSEI) to assess the urban ecological quality. The RSEI integrated the primary land surface components (i.e., the build-up area and vegetation cover) and the climate (the land surface temperature and land surface moisture) based on the framework of the pressure-state-response (PSR) using a principal components analysis (PCA). In taking advantage of the same data source for all the indicators, the RSEI was shown to be scalable, visualizable and comparable at different spatio-temporal scales, and it can avoid the variation or error in weight definitions caused by individual characteristics. We used Fuzhou City in Fujian Province, south-eastern China, as a case study, it showed that Fuzhou demonstrated ecological deterioration during the study period from 2000 to 2016, with its RSEI value decreasing from 0.595 in 2000 to 0.503 in 2016. Moreover, the results of the spatial autocorrelation and semi-variance indicated that there was a spatial correlation in the distribution of the RSEI, with high clusters at the edge and low clusters in the centre of the city. The values of the sill, the nugget: sill ratio and the range all increased from 2000 to 2016, which indicated a higher spatial autocorrelation and lower spatial heterogeneity percentage in 2016 than that in 2000 in terms of the RSEI. Based on the combination with the spatial clusters and the spatiotemporal clusters, we confirmed that the RSEI is not randomly distributed. Moreover, a hole-effect semivariogram was observed, indicating a high level of human intervention in the study area. Specifically, the construction of the build-up area during the study period led to outward ecological degradation, and urban afforestation promoted environmental quality in the central urban area.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.02.006

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 62 references

Cited by

See all 533

Metadata

Authors
Hu, X., & Xu, H.
Venue
Ecological Indicators
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-06
Volume
89
Pages
11-21
ISSN
1470-160X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2790518257
Cited by
533
References
62
FWCI
18.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A new remote sensing index for assessing the spatial heterogeneity in urban ecological quality: A case from Fuzhou City, China. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.02.006
The paper
Hu, X., & Xu, H. (2018). A new remote sensing index for assessing the spatial heterogeneity in urban ecological quality: A case from Fuzhou City, China. Ecological Indicators. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.02.006

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.