The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Trend analysis and forecast of PM2.5 in Fuzhou, China using the ARIMA model
Abstract
Abstract Atmospheric haze from particulate matter has become a major health concern in many large and medium-sized cities of China. Fine airborne particles, PM2.5, are a major component of haze, and the reasons for their fluctuating concentrations need to be better understood to improve air quality. While much of the air quality data from the China National Environmental Monitoring Centre (CNEMC) has already been analyzed for larger Chinese cities such as Beijing and Shanghai, the data from Fuzhou is the topic of this study. Time series data of pollutant concentrations and meteorological parameters were accessed for Fuzhou from August 2014 to July 2016, covering two cold periods (November through February) and two warm periods (May through July). PM2.5 concentrations were compared with those of other pollutants and with meteorological parameters, and the AutoRegressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) model was applied to forecast PM2.5 concentrations. The correlation analysis of Spearman’s rho showed that PM2.5 concentrations had significant positive correlations with PM10, SO2 and NO2 concentrations, while they had negative correlations with meteorological parameters. The ARIMA results showed that PM2.5 concentrations experienced seasonal fluctuations over the two years, which were higher in the cold periods and lower in the corresponding warm periods, ranging from 23 to 52 μg/m3 and from 19 to 31 μg/m3, respectively. Average PM2.5 concentrations during these same cold periods and warm periods were 35 μg/m3 over the two cold periods, which was 52% higher than the 23 μg/m3 averaged over the two warm periods. Compared to the two observed years, 2014–15 and 2015–16, the forecast of PM2.5 concentrations for 2016–17, ranging from about 15 to 30 μg/m3, exhibited similar seasonal fluctuations but also reduced in the same period, ranging from 19 to 52 μg/m3. It is speculated that the Fuzhou Government's macro-policy on air quality may be one of the reasons for the decrease in PM2.5 concentration during the cold periods. Possible causes were given for the discrepancies between actual and fit values.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control
Geurts, M., Box, G. E. P., & Jenkins, G. M. (1977) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3150485 · Cited by 19,186
The proof and measurement of association between two things
Spearman, C. (1904) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1412159 · Cited by 8,039
Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control
Kleiner, B. (1977) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1977.10489562 · Cited by 6,446
Kelly, F. J., & Fussell, J. C. (2012) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.06.039 · Cited by 1,276
The characteristics of PM2.5 in Beijing, China
He, K., Yang, F., Ma, Y., Zhang, Q., Yao, X., Chan, C. K., Cadle, S., Chan, T., & Mulawa, P. (2001) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/s1352-2310(01)00301-6 · Cited by 1,049
Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in China at a city level
Zhang, Y.-L., & Cao, F. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep14884 · Cited by 921
Zhang, X. Y., Wang, Y. Q., Niu, T., Zhang, X. C., Gong, S. L., Zhang, Y. M., & Sun, J. Y. (2012) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-12-779-2012 · Cited by 867
Ecosystem services response to urbanization in metropolitan areas: Thresholds identification
Peng, J., Tian, L., Liu, Y., Zhao, M., Hu, Y., & Wu, J. (2017) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.06.218 · Cited by 660
Yuan, C., Liu, S., & Fang, Z. (2016) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2016.02.001 · Cited by 393
Mushtaq, R. (2011) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1911068 · Cited by 289
Cited by
Forecast Methods for Time Series Data: A Survey
Liu, Z., Zhu, Z., Gao, J., & Xu, C. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3091162 · Cited by 247
Subramaniam, S., Raju, N., Ganesan, A., Rajavel, N., Chenniappan, M., Prakash, C., Pramanik, A., Basak, A. K., & Dixit, S. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14169951 · Cited by 193
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, L., Lin, J., Qiu, R., Hu, X., Zhang, H., Chen, Q., Tan, H., Lin, D., & Wang, J.
- Venue
- Ecological Indicators
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-12
- Volume
- 95
- Pages
- 702-710
- ISSN
- 1470-160X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2888345420
- Cited by
- 304
- References
- 24
- FWCI
- 12.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Trend analysis and forecast of PM2.5 in Fuzhou, China using the ARIMA model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.08.032
- The paper
- Zhang, L., Lin, J., Qiu, R., Hu, X., Zhang, H., Chen, Q., Tan, H., Lin, D., & Wang, J. (2018). Trend analysis and forecast of PM2.5 in Fuzhou, China using the ARIMA model. Ecological Indicators. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.08.032
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.