Detecting small changes in populations at landscape scales: a bioacoustic site-occupancy framework
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Compared to camera traps, passive acoustic monitoring is mostly unaffected by light and weather conditions, senses the environment omnidirectionally, and tends to be cost-effective when data needs to be collected at large spatiotemporal scales with high resolution.
“Compared to camera traps, PAM is mostly unaffected by light and weather conditions (some factors like wind still play a role), senses the environment omnidirectionally, and tends to be cost-effective when data needs to be collected at large spatiotemporal scales with high resolution60.”
From Perspectives in machine learning for wildlife conservation (2022) · cites this paper as [60]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 71 · Cited by 103
- Authors
- Wood, C. M., Popescu, V. D., Klinck, H., Keane, J. J., Gutiérrez, R. J., Sawyer, S. C., & Peery, M. Z.
- Affiliations
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- University of Bucharest (RO)
- Cornell University (US)
- Pacific Southwest Research Station (US)
- US Forest Service (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wood, Connor M.
- Venue
- Ecological Indicators
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-03
- Volume
- 98
- Pages
- 492-507
- ISSN
- 1470-160X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2900738054
- Cited by
- 103
- References
- 71
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8
- FWCI
- 5.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Ecological Indicators (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
- University of Wisconsin-Madison
- U.S. Forest Service
- California Department of Fish and Wildlife
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecological Modeling › Species Distribution and Climate Change
- Keywords
- site occupancy, bioacoustic monitoring, statistical power analysis, detection probability, spotted owl, Barred Owl, invasive species, population decline detection, landscape-scale monitoring, sampling effort, species coexistence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
