Cited by 762Wildlife Ecology and ConservationSpecies Distribution and Climate ChangeAnimal Ecology and Behavior Studies

Perspectives in machine learning for wildlife conservation

Open access
Tuia, Devis, Kellenberger, Benjamin, Beery, Sara, Costelloe, Blair R., Zuffi, Silvia, Risse, Benjamin, Mathis, Alexander, Mathis, Mackenzie W. +10 more·2022·Nature Communications

Abstract

Inexpensive and accessible sensors are accelerating data acquisition in animal ecology. These technologies hold great potential for large-scale ecological understanding, but are limited by current processing approaches which inefficiently distill data into relevant information. We argue that animal ecologists can capitalize on large datasets generated by modern sensors by combining machine learning approaches with domain knowledge. Incorporating machine learning into ecological workflows could improve inputs for ecological models and lead to integrated hybrid modeling tools. This approach will require close interdisciplinary collaboration to ensure the quality of novel approaches and train a new generation of data scientists in ecology and conservation.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This Perspective argues that animal ecology and conservation can exploit modern sensor data by integrating machine learning with ecological domain knowledge, rather than applying off-the-shelf ML. It reviews success stories across detection, re-identification, pose estimation, environmental reconstruction, and biodiversity modeling, and outlines attention points for responsible, interdisciplinary use.

Key findings

  • Sensor expansion creates a data deluge: Agouti hosted 31 million images in August 2021 with only 1.5 million annotated, while Wildlife Insights was automatically processing 17 million camera trap images in August 2021; ML analysis cost reductions are estimated between 2 and 10×.
  • ML/DL improve detection and identification: large mammal detection in Kuzikus improved from 20% to 80% recall at 75% precision; chimpanzee face recognition on 23 individuals and 1 million images achieved >90% accuracy (DL 84% vs. human novices 20% and experts 42%); tiger re-identification exceeded 90% across 92 tigers and 8,000 video clips.
  • Domain-informed/hybrid models improve performance: Context R-CNN increased mean species identification precision on Snapshot Serengeti by 17.9%; taxonomic and locational priors improved plant classification by about 5%; distribution and photographer-bias priors improved iNaturalist accuracy by up to 12%; expert ranger knowledge improved poaching predictions.
  • Operational examples show scale: MegaDetector was used by Wildlife Protection Solutions across over 400 connected cameras in 18 countries, analyzing over 900K images in a year and detecting at least one real threat per week; Idaho Department of Fish and Game automated 9.5 million of 11 million camera trap images, halved labeling costs, and reduced a ~5-year labeling lag.

Methods

  • Perspective/narrative review, not a primary empirical study; it synthesizes literature and case studies at the interface of machine learning, animal ecology, and wildlife conservation.
  • Covers sensor types including camera traps, bioacoustic sensors, on-animal bio-loggers, UAVs, satellites, and community science, and ML tasks including detection/classification, individual re-identification, pose/3D reconstruction, environmental reconstruction, and species richness/interaction modeling.
  • Main analysis is qualitative synthesis with cited performance examples; no systematic search strategy, meta-analysis, or new dataset is described.

Limitations

  • Stated by the paper: geographic, sensor, and species biases can limit model generalization; quality control and uncertainty estimation are urgently needed; open data sharing carries ethical/privacy risks such as poacher access; and ML has environmental and financial costs.
  • Stated by the paper: community science labels can be noisy or erroneous; drone flights below 150 m can significantly affect mammal behavior; passive acoustic monitoring and camera traps face data-scale, domain-shift, and labeled-data scarcity challenges.
  • Evident from the text: as a Perspective, it is not a systematic review and reports selected examples rather than exhaustive evidence; it presents no primary data collection or formal quantitative synthesis.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-022-27980-y

Cites

161 of 161 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 101 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingreasoning

    Skillful applications of state-of-the-art machine learning concepts for animal ecology now exist, thanks to corporate and research efforts.

    “We observe that skillful applications of state-of-the-art ML concepts for animal ecology now exist, thanks to corporate (e.g., Wildlife Insights) and research (AIDE, MegaDetector, DeepLabCut) efforts, but that there is still much room (and need) for genuinely new concepts pushed by interdisciplinary research, in particular towards hybrid models and new habitat distribution models at scale.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Premisecitation

    Machine learning has emerged as a promising means of connecting big data and actionable ecological insights.

    “ML has emerged as a promising means of connecting the dots between big data and actionable ecological insights29”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [29] Christin, S., Hervet, É. & Lecomte, N. Applications for deep learning in ecology. Methods Ecol. Evolution 10, 1632–1644 (2019). source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Premisecitation

    There is a mismatch between the ever-growing volume of raw measures acquired for ecological studies and our ability to process and analyze this multi-source data to derive conclusive ecological insights rapidly and at scale.

    “There is a mismatch between the ever-growing volume of raw measures (videos, images, audio recordings) acquired for ecological studies and our ability to process and analyze this multi-source data to derive conclusive ecological insights rapidly and at scale.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Premisecitation

    Use of machine learning massively reduces analysis costs, with reduction factors estimated between 2 and 10.

    “use of ML also massively reduces analysis costs, with reduction factors estimated between 2 and 1042.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [42] Eikelboom, J. A. J. et al. Improving the precision and accuracy of animal population estimates with aerial image object detection. Methods Ecol. Evolution 10, 1875–1887 (2019). source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Premisecitation

    Large mammal detection in the Kuzikus reserve in 2014 was improved from a recall rate of 20% to 80% for a common 75% precision rate.

    “large mammal detection in the Kuzikus reserve in 2014 was improved significantly by improving the detection methodologies, from a recall rate of 20%35 to 80%37 (for a common 75% precision rate).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [35] Rey, N., Volpi, M., Joost, S. & Tuia, D. Detecting animals in African savanna with UAVs and the crowds. Remote Sens. Environ. 200, 341–351 (2017). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [37] Kellenberger, B., Marcos, D. & Tuia, D. When a few clicks make all the difference: improving weakly-supervised wildlife detection in UAV images. in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (2019). source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 74
  • May combine two claims. 60
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    An interdisciplinary community of computer scientists and ecologists is emerging.

    “However, an interdisciplinary community of computer scientists and ecologists is emerging, which we hope will tackle this technological and societal challenge together.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Central challenges to efficient data analysis are the sheer volume of data generated by modern collection methods and the heterogeneous nature of many ecological datasets, which preclude the use of simple automated analysis techniques.

    “Central challenges to efficient data analysis are the sheer volume of data generated by modern collection methods and the heterogeneous nature of many ecological datasets, which preclude the use of simple automated analysis techniques26.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [26] Farley, S. S., Dawson, A., Goring, S. J. & Williams, J. W. Situating ecology as a big-data science: current advances, challenges, and solutions. BioScience 68, 563–576 (2018). source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Current processing approaches inefficiently distill sensor data into relevant information.

    “but are limited by current processing approaches which inefficiently distill data into relevant information”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Inexpensive and accessible sensors are accelerating data acquisition in animal ecology.

    “Inexpensive and accessible sensors are accelerating data acquisition in animal ecology.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Deep learning models have shown superior performance across the majority of machine learning use cases.

    “a family of highly versatile ML models based on artificial neural networks that have shown superior performance across the majority of ML use cases”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [32] LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y. & Hinton, G. Deep learning. Nature 521, 436–444 (2015). source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Hybrid models leveraging both deep learning and bio-physical models tend to be less data-intensive, avoid incoherent predictions, and are generally more interpretable than purely data-driven models.

    “such hybrid models tend to be less data-intensive, avoid incoherent predictions, and are generally more interpretable than purely data-driven models.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [48] Reichstein, M. et al. Deep learning and process understanding for data-driven Earth system science. Nature 566, 195–204 (2019). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [49] Camps-Valls, G., Tuia, D., Zhu, X. X. & Reichstein, M. Deep Learning for the Earth Sciences: A Comprehensive Approach to Remote Sensing, Climate Science and Geosciences (Wiley & Sons, 2021). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [50] Karpatne, A. et al. Theory-guided data science: A new paradigm for scientific discovery from data. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 29, 2318–2331 (2017). source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Compared to camera traps, passive acoustic monitoring is mostly unaffected by light and weather conditions, senses the environment omnidirectionally, and tends to be cost-effective when data needs to be collected at large spatiotemporal scales with high resolution.

    “Compared to camera traps, PAM is mostly unaffected by light and weather conditions (some factors like wind still play a role), senses the environment omnidirectionally, and tends to be cost-effective when data needs to be collected at large spatiotemporal scales with high resolution60.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [60] Wood, C. M. et al. Detecting small changes in populations at landscape scales: a bioacoustic site-occupancy framework. Ecol. Indic. 98, 492–507 (2019). source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    The viability of community science services may be limited depending on the task and oftentimes substantial efforts are required to verify volunteer-annotated data.

    “However, it is prudent to note that the viability of community science services may be limited depending on the task and that oftentimes substantial efforts are required to verify volunteer-annotated data.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Various supervised machine learning methods have shown potential in automating behavior analysis from accelerometer data, identifying behavioral state from trajectories, and predicting animal movement.

    “Various supervised ML methods have shown their potential in automating behavior analysis from accelerometer data68,69, identifying behavioral state from trajectories70, and predicting animal movement71.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [68] Browning, E. et al. Predicting animal behaviour using deep learning: GPS data alone accurately predict diving in seabirds. Methods Ecol. Evolution 9, 681–692 (2018). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [69] Liu, Z. Y.-C. et al. Deep learning accurately predicts white shark locomotor activity from depth data. Anim. Biotelemetry 7, 1–13 (2019). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [70] Wang, G. Machine learning for inferring animal behavior from location and movement data. Ecol. Inform. 49, 69–76 (2019). source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    While machine learning has been extensively applied to camera trap images, its application to long-term passive acoustic monitoring datasets is still in its infancy and the first deep-learning-based studies are only starting to appear.

    “While ML has been extensively applied to camera trap images, its application to long-term PAM datasets is still in its infancy and the first DL-based studies are only starting to appear”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [61] Kahl, S., Wood, C. M., Eibl, M. & Klinck, H. Birdnet: a deep learning solution for avian diversity monitoring. Ecol. Inform. 61, 101236 (2021). source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Flying at lower altitudes, for example lower than 150 m, can have a significant impact on group and individual behavior of mammals, although the severity of wildlife disturbance from drone deployments depends heavily on the focal species, the equipment used, and characteristics of the drone flight.

    “A recent study80 showed that flying at lower altitudes (e.g., lower than 150 m) can have a significant impact on group and individual behavior of mammals, although the severity of wildlife disturbance from drone deployments will depend heavily on the focal species, the equipment used, and characteristics of the drone flight (such as approach speed and altitude)81”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [80] Schroeder, N. M., Panebianco, A., Gonzalez Musso, R. & Carmanchahi, P. An experimental approach to evaluate the potential of drones in terrestrial mammal research: a gregarious ungulate as a study model. R. Soc. open Sci. 7, 191482 (2020). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [81] Bennitt, E., Bartlam-Brooks, H. L. A., Hubel, T. Y. & Wilson, A. M. Terrestrial mammalian wildlife responses to Unmanned Aerial Systems approaches. Sci. Rep. 9, 1–10 (2019). source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    On-animal sensors are the most common remote sensing devices deployed in animal ecology.

    “On-animal sensors are the most common remote sensing devices deployed in animal ecology10.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [10] Kays, R., Crofoot, M. C., Jetz, W. & Wikelski, M. Terrestrial animal tracking as an eye on life and planet. Science 348, aaa2478 (2015). source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The inherent complexity of soundscapes requires noise-robust algorithms that generalize well and can separate and identify many animal sounds of interest from confounding natural and anthropogenic signals in a wide variety of acoustic environments.

    “Second, the inherent complexity of soundscapes requires noise-robust algorithms that generalize well and can separate and identify many animal sounds of interest from confounding natural and anthropogenic signals in a wide variety of acoustic environments62.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [62] Stowell, D., Wood, M. D., Pamuła, H., Stylianou, Y. & Glotin, H. Automatic acoustic detection of birds through deep learning: the first bird audio detection challenge. Methods Ecol. Evolution 10, 368–380 (2019). source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Integrating ecological domain knowledge into machine learning methods is essential to designing models that are accurate in the way they describe animal life.

    “integrating ecological domain knowledge into ML methods is essential to designing models that are accurate in the way they describe animal life.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The challenging nature of ecological data, compounded by the size of datasets generated by novel sensors and the ever-increasing complexity of state-of-the-art machine learning methods, favors a collaborative approach that harnesses the expertise of both the machine learning and animal ecology communities, rather than an application of off-the-shelf machine learning methodologies to ecological挑战.

    “We believe that the challenging nature of ecological data, compounded by the size of the datasets generated by novel sensors and the ever-increasing complexity of state-of-the-art ML methods, favor a collaborative approach that harnesses the expertise of both the ML and animal ecology communities, rather than an application of off-the-shelf ML methodologies to ecological challenges.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Increased scale of available data due to de-siloing efforts from organizations like Wildlife Insights and LILA.science will help increase machine learning accuracy and robustness across regions and taxa.

    “The increased scale of available data due to de-siloing efforts from organizations like Wildlife Insights (www.wildlifeinsights.org) and LILA.science (www.lila.science) will help increase ML accuracy and robustness across regions and taxa.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    The Great Grevy's Rally was hosted for the first time in January 2016 and has become a regular event held every other year.

    “Hosted for the first time in January 2016, it has become a regular event, held every other year.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Sensor data has the potential to unlock ecological understanding on a scale difficult to imagine in the recent past.

    “The sensor data described in the previous section has the potential to unlock ecological understanding on a scale difficult to imagine in the recent past.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    Hundreds of people capture approximately 50,000 images over the 2-day Great Grevy's Rally event.

    “Hundreds of people, from school children and park rangers, to Nairobi families and international tourists, embark on a mission to photograph Grevy’s zebras across its range in Kenya, capturing ~50,000 images over the 2-day event.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    Wildbook data has become the basis for IUCN Red List global population numbers for several species.

    “Wildbook data has become the basis for the IUCN Red List global population numbers for several species”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Using volunteer-acquired images provides a substantial increase in the number of images and the chances of photographing species or single individuals in different regions, poses, and viewing angles.

    “it provides a substantial increase in the number of images and the chances of photographing species or single individuals in different regions, poses, and viewing angles.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The Great Grevy's Rally is a successful demonstration of the power of community science-based wildlife monitoring.

    “The Great Grevy’s Rally, a community science-based wildlife census effort occurring every 2 years in Kenya92, is a successful demonstration of the power of community science-based wildlife monitoring.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [92] Parham, J., Crall, J., Stewart, C., Berger-Wolf, T. & Rubenstein, D. I. Animal population censusing at scale with citizen science and photographic identification. in AAAI Spring Symposium-Technical Report (2017).

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Wildbook supports collaborative mark-recapture, molecular ecology, and social ecology studies, especially where community science and artificial intelligence can help scale-up projects.

    “Wildbook supports collaborative mark-recapture, molecular ecology, and social ecology studies, especially where community science and artificial intelligence can help scale-up projects.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    The Great Grevy's Rally has become the foundation of the Kenya Wildlife Service's Grevy's zebra endangered species management policy and generates the official IUCN Red List population numbers for the species.

    “The Great Grevy’s Rally has become the foundation of the Kenya Wildlife Service’s Grevy’s zebra endangered species management policy and generates the official IUCN Red List population numbers for the species.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Annotator errors include misdetected or mislabeled animals due to annotator fatigue or insufficient knowledge, and systematic errors from adversarial annotators.

    “This is due to annotator errors, including misdetected or mislabeled animals due to annotator fatigue or insufficient knowledge about the annotation task, as well as systematic errors from adversarial annotators.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    Wildbook is an open-source software platform that blends structured wildlife research with artificial intelligence, community science, and computer vision to speed population analysis and develop new insights to help conservation.

    “Wildbook, a project of the non-profit Wild Me, is an open-source software platform that blends structured wildlife research with artificial intelligence, community science, and computer vision to speed population analysis and develop new insights to help conservation”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    For simple tasks like animal detection, community science effort can be open to the public, while for more complex tasks such as identifying bird species with subtle appearance differences, communities of experts are needed to provide accurate labels.

    “For simple tasks like animal detection, community science effort can be open to the public, while for more complex ones such as identifying bird species with subtle appearance differences (“fine-grained classification”, also see the glossary), communities of experts are needed to provide accurate labels.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Out of more than 120,000 species monitored by the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, up to 17,000 have a Data deficient status.

    “out of more than 120,000 species monitored by the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, up to 17,000 have a ‘Data deficient’ status2.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [2] Committee, T. I. R. L. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species - Strategic Plan 2017-2020. Tech. Rep., IUCN (2017).

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Volunteer-annotated data services may be limited depending on the task and often require substantial verification effort.

    “services may be limited depending on the task and that oftentimes substantial efforts are required to verify volunteer-annotated data.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    With the ability to identify individual animals in images, Wildbook can enable an accurate population census and track population trends over time.

    “With the ability to identify individual animals in those images, Wildbook can enable an accurate population census and track population trends over time.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Using volunteer-acquired images sacrifices control over image acquisitions and is prone to significant noise, for example through low-quality imagery.

    “Although this approach sacrifices control over image acquisitions and is likewise prone to inducing significant noise to datasets, for example through low-quality imagery”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    There are currently Wildbooks for over 50 species, from sea dragons to zebras, spanning the entire planet.

    “There are currently Wildbooks for over 50 species, from sea dragons to zebras, spanning the entire planet.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    More than 80 scientific publications have been enabled by Wildbook.

    “More than 80 scientific publications have been enabled by Wildbook.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    Wildbook supported the change in conservation status for whale sharks from vulnerable to endangered.

    “supported the change in conservation status for whale sharks from “vulnerable” to “endangered”.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Wildbook image analysis can start with images from any source and use ML and computer vision to detect multiple animals, classify their species, and identify individual animals.

    “The image analysis of Wildbook can start with images from any source—scientists, camera traps, drones, community scientists, or social media—and use ML and computer vision to detect multiple animals in the images100 to not only classify their species, but identify individual animals applying a suite of different algorithms101,147.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [100] Parham, J. et al. An animal detection pipeline for identification. in IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), 1075–1083 (IEEE, 2018). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [101] Weideman, H. et al. Extracting identifying contours for African elephants and humpback whales using a learned appearance model. in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV) (2020). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [147] Arzoumanian, Z., Holmberg, J. & Norman, B. An astronomical pattern-matching algorithm for computer-aided identification of whale sharks Rhincodon typus. J. Appl. Ecol. 42, 999–1011 (2005). source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    To unlock that potential, sensor data must be interpreted and converted to usable information for ecological research.

    “But to do so, it must be interpreted and converted to usable information for ecological research.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The measures yielded by this conversion are sometimes referred to as animal biometrics.

    “The measures yielded by this conversion, reviewed in this section, are also sometimes referred to as animal biometrics93.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [93] Kühl, H. S. & Burghardt, T. Animal biometrics: quantifying and detecting phenotypic appearance. Trends Ecol. Evolution 28, 432–441 (2013). source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Computational restrictions in these models limit the number of training examples, likely reducing generalization to new sensor deployments or regions.

    “Second, computational restrictions in these models limit the number of training examples, which is likely to have detrimental effects on variations in data (temporal, seasonal, etc.), thus reducing the generalization capabilities to new sensor deployments or regions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    WPS used the MegaDetector to analyze over 900K images last year, which comes out to 2.5K images per day.

    “WPS used the MegaDetector to analyze over 900K images last year alone, which comes out to 2.5K images per day.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Conservation efforts of endangered species require knowledge on how many individuals of the species in question are present in a study area.

    “Conservation efforts of endangered species require knowledge on how many individuals of the species in question are present in a study area.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    WPS have over 400 connected cameras deployed in 18 different countries, and that number is growing rapidly.

    “They have over 400 connected cameras deployed in 18 different countries, and that number is growing rapidly.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Imaging sensors paired with ML models that detect and count individuals in imagery can provide the most significant input to these observations.

    “It is these observations where imaging sensors (camera traps, UAVs, etc.), paired with ML models that detect and count individuals in the imagery, can provide the most significant input.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    MegaDetector is a generic, global-scale human, animal, and vehicle detection model that works off-the-shelf for most camera trap data.

    “This generic, global-scale human, animal, and vehicle detection model works off-the-shelf for most camera trap data”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [36] Beery, S., Morris, D. & Yang, S. Efficient pipeline for camera trap image review. in Proceedings of the Workshop Data Mining and AI for Conservation, Conference for Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (2019).

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    Tasks involved in different approaches show similarities with traditional tasks in ML and computer vision, such as detection, localization, identification, and pose estimation.

    “Interestingly, the tasks involved in the different approaches show similarities with traditional tasks in ML and computer vision (e.g., detection, localization, identification, pose estimation), for which we provide a matching example in animal ecology in Fig. 5.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Such estimations are conventionally realized with statistical occurrence models informed by sample-based species observations.

    “Such estimations are conventionally realized with statistical occurrence models that are informed by sample-based species observations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Using MegaDetector allowed IDFG to label all data before the start of the next monitoring season, whereas manual labeling previously resulted in a lag of approximately 5 years from image collection to completion of labeling.

    “allowed IDFG to label all data before the start of the next monitoring season, whereas manual labeling previously resulted in a lag of ~5 years from image collection to completion of labeling.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    IDFG relies heavily on camera traps to estimate and monitor the wolf population, and needs to process data each year before the next season to make informed policy changes or conservation interventions.

    “IDFG relies heavily on camera traps to estimate and monitor this wolf population, and needs to process the data collected each year before the start of the next season in order to make informed policy changes or conservation interventions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The standard for identification of animal species and identity is DNA profiling, which can be difficult to scale to large, distributed populations.

    “The standard for identification of animal species and identity is DNA profiling97, which can be difficult to scale to large, distributed populations54,93.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [97] Avise, J. C. Molecular Markers, Natural History and Evolution (Springer Science & Business Media, 2012).

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [54] Schneider, S., Taylor, G. W., Linquist, S. & Kremer, S. C. Past, present and future approaches using computer vision for animal re-identification from camera trap data. Methods Ecol. Evolution 10, 461–470 (2019). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [93] Kühl, H. S. & Burghardt, T. Animal biometrics: quantifying and detecting phenotypic appearance. Trends Ecol. Evolution 28, 432–441 (2013). source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Conversion of sensor data can take the form of abundance mapping, individual animal re-identification, herd tracking, or digital reconstruction of the environment.

    “For example, such conversion can take the form of abundance mapping, individual animal re-identification, herd tracking, or digital reconstruction (three-dimensional, phenotypical) of the environment the animals live in.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    The publicly-hosted MegaDetector API has been integrated into wildlife monitoring workflows of over 30 organizations worldwide.

    “the publicly-hosted MegaDetector API has been integrated into the wildlife monitoring workflows of over 30 organizations worldwide, including the Wildlife Conservation Society, San Diego Zoo Global, and Island Conservation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In that study, humans achieved identification accuracy between 20% (novices) and 42% (experts) with annotation time between 1 and 2 hours, while the DL model achieved 84% in seconds.

    “where humans achieved identification accuracy between 20% (novices) and 42% (experts) with an annotation time between 1 and 2 h, the DL model achieved an identification accuracy of 84% in a matter of seconds.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [38] Schofield, D. et al. Chimpanzee face recognition from videos in the wild using deep learning. Sci. Adv. 5, eaaw0736 (2019). source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A study of 23 chimpanzees in Guinea applied facial recognition to a multi-year dataset of 1 million images and achieved greater than 90% accuracy.

    “a study of a small group of 23 chimpanzees in Guinea applied facial recognition techniques to a multi-year dataset comprising 1 million images and achieved >90% accuracy38.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [38] Schofield, D. et al. Chimpanzee face recognition from videos in the wild using deep learning. Sci. Adv. 5, eaaw0736 (2019). source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    The 3D shape of an individual can be related to its health, age, or reproductive status.

    “The 3D shape of an individual can be related to its health, age, or reproductive status”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    As an alternative to gene-based identification, manual tagging can be used to keep track of individual animals.

    “As an alternative to gene-based identification, manual tagging can be used to keep track of individual animals10,93.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [10] Kays, R., Crofoot, M. C., Jetz, W. & Wikelski, M. Terrestrial animal tracking as an eye on life and planet. Science 348, aaa2478 (2015). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [93] Kühl, H. S. & Burghardt, T. Animal biometrics: quantifying and detecting phenotypic appearance. Trends Ecol. Evolution 28, 432–441 (2013). source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Particular challenges for animal re-identification in wild populations include difficulty of manual curation, larger populations, changes in appearance, few sightings per individual, and frequent addition of new individuals, creating an open-set problem.

    “The particular challenges for animal (re-)identification in wild populations are related to the difficulty of manual curation, larger populations, changes in appearance (e.g., due to scars, growth), few sightings per individual, and the frequent addition of new individuals that may enter the system due to birth or immigration, therefore creating an “open-set” problem104 wherein the model must deal”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [104] Bendale, A. & Boult, T. E. Towards open set deep networks. in 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 1563–1572 (2016). source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Recent work defines the SMAL model, a 3D articulated shape model for a set of quadruped families.

    “Recent work defines the SMAL (Skinned Multi-Animal Linear) model, a 3D articulated shape model for a set of quadruped families107.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [107] Zuffi, S., Kanazawa, A., Jacobs, D. W. & Black, M. J. 3D menagerie: modeling the 3D shape and pose of animals. in 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 6365–6373 (2017). source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    3D shape models have recently been defined also for birds.

    “3D shape models have been recently defined also for birds111.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [111] Wang, Y., Kolotouros, N., Daniilidis, K. & Badger, M. Birds of a feather: capturing avian shape models from images. in 2021 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 14739–14749 (2021). source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    3D reconstructions of kill sites for lions in South Africa revealed novel insights into predator-prey relationships and their connection to ecosystem stability and functioning.

    “3D reconstructions of kill sites for lions in South Africa revealed novel insights into the predator-prey relationships and their connection to ecosystem stability and functioning114”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [114] Davies, A. B., Tambling, C. J., Kerley, G. I. H. & Asner, G. P. Effects of vegetation structure on the location of lion kill sites in African thicket. PLoS ONE 11, e0149098 (2016). source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In ref. 110, the SMAL model was used in a DL approach to predict 3D shape and pose of the Grevy's zebra from images.

    “In ref. 110, the SMAL model has been used in a DL approach to predict 3D shape and pose of the Grevy’s zebra from images.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [110] Zuffi, S., Kanazawa, A., Berger-Wolf, T. & Black, M. J. Three-D safari: learning to estimate zebra pose, shape, and texture from images" in the wild". in 2019 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 5359–5368 (2019). source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Spatial reconstructions of the environment can be extracted using dedicated sensors such as LiDAR or reconstructed from multiple images via mosaicking or structure from motion/SLAM.

    “Such spatial reconstructions of the environment can either be extracted by using dedicated sensors such as LiDAR116 or can be reconstructed from multiple images, either by stitching the images into a unified two-dimensional panorama (e.g., mosaicking117) or by computing the three-dimensional environment from partially overlapping images (e.g., structure from motion118 or simultaneous localization”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [116] Risse, B., Mangan, M., Stürzl, W. & Webb, B. Software to convert terrestrial LiDAR scans of natural environments into photorealistic meshes. Environ. Model. Softw. 99, 88–100 (2018). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [117] Haalck, L. & Risse, B. Embedded dense camera trajectories in multi-video image mosaics by geodesic interpolation-based reintegration. in 2021 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), 1849–1858 (2021). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [118] Schonberger, J. L. & Frahm, J.-M. Structure-from-motion revisited. in 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 4104–4113 (2016). source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    The 3D pose of the body can provide finer information on posture attributes and allows kinematic and behavioral analyses.

    “the 3D pose of the body can provide finer information with respect to posture attributes and allows, for instance, kinematic as well as behavioral analyses.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Satellite remote sensing has become an integral part to study animal habitats, biological diversity, and spatiotemporal changes of abiotic conditions, since it allows mapping land cover, soil moisture, or temperature at scale.

    “Satellite remote sensing has become an integral part to study animal habitats, biological diversity, and spatiotemporal changes of abiotic conditions113, since it allows to map quantities like land cover, soil moisture, or temperature at scale.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [113] Pettorelli, N. et al. Satellite remote sensing for applied ecologists: opportunities and challenges. J. Appl. Ecol. 51, 839–848 (2014). source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Image-based 3D pose and shape estimation methods provide rich information about individuals but require accurate shape models and prior knowledge about the animal's 3D motion.

    “Image-based 3D pose and shape estimation methods provide rich information about individuals but require, in addition to accurate shape models, prior knowledge about the animal’s 3D motion.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Biggs et al. built on SMAL for 3D shape and motion of dogs from video and for recovery of dog shape and pose across many breeds.

    “Biggs et al. built on this work for 3D shape and motion of dogs from video108 and for recovery of dog shape and pose across many different breeds109.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [108] Biggs, B., Roddick, T., Fitzgibbon, A. & Cipolla, R. Creatures great and smal: recovering the shape and motion of animals from video. in 2018 Asian Conference on Computer Vision (ACCV), 3–19 (Springer, 2018). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [109] Biggs, B., Boyne, O., Charles, J., Fitzgibbon, A. & Cipolla, R. Who left the dogs out? 3D animal reconstruction with expectation maximization in the loop. in 2020 European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), 195–211 (Springer, 2020). source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Wildlife behavior and conservation cannot be dissociated from the environment animals evolve and live in.

    “Wildlife behavior and conservation cannot be dissociated from the environment animals evolve and live in.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Various user-friendly toolboxes are available to extract the 2D posture of animals from videos, while the user can define which body parts should be estimated.

    “Various user-friendly toolboxes are available to extract the 2D posture of animals from videos (Fig. 1d, e), while the user can define which body parts should be estimated (reviewed in ref. 76).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [76] Mathis, A., Schneider, S., Lauer, J. & Mathis, M. W. A primer on motion capture with deep learning: principles, pitfalls, and perspectives. Neuron 108, 44–65 (2020). source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Marker-less DL methods for pose estimation have tremendously improved over the last years and already impacted biology.

    “For pose estimation, marker-less methods based on DL have tremendously improved over the last years and already impacted biology105.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [105] Mathis, M. W. & Mathis, A. Deep learning tools for the measurement of animal behavior in neuroscience. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 60, 1–11 (2020). source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Graph regression techniques were deployed to reconstruct species interaction networks in a community of European birds with promising results, including better causality estimates of the relations in the graph.

    “More recently, graph regression techniques were deployed to reconstruct species interaction networks in a community of European birds with promising results, including better causality estimates of the relations in the graph131.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [131] Faisal, A., Dondelinger, F., Husmeier, D. & Beale, C. M. Inferring species interaction networks from species abundance data: a comparative evaluation of various statistical and machine learning methods. Ecol. Inform. 5, 451–464 (2010). source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Non-parametric ML techniques like Random Forest have been successfully used to predict species richness and have shown significant error reduction with respect to traditional counterparts used in ecology, for example in fishes, spiders, and small mammals.

    “Non-parametric ML techniques like Random Forest126 have been successfully used to predict species richness and have shown significant error reduction with respect to the traditional counterparts used in ecology, for example in the estimation of richness distributions of fishes127,128, spiders 129, and small mammals130.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [126] Breiman, L. Random forests. Mach. Learn. 45, 5–32 (2001). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [127] Parravicini, V. et al. Global patterns and predictors of tropical reef fish species richness. Ecography 36, 1254–1262 (2013). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [128] Smoliński, S. & Radtke, K. Spatial prediction of demersal fish diversity in the baltic sea: comparison of machine learning and regression-based techniques. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 74, 102–111 (2017). source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Spatially explicit linear regression models have been conventionally used to predict species and community distribution based on explanatory variables such as climate and topography.

    “Spatially explicit linear regression models have been conventionally used to predict species and community distribution based on explanatory variables such as climate and topography124,125.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [124] Guisan, A. & Zimmermann, N. E. Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecol. Model. 135, 147–186 (2000). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [125] Lehmann, A., Overton, J. M. & Austin, M. P. Regression models for spatial prediction: their role for biodiversity and conservation. Biodivers. Conserv. 11, 2085–2092 (2002). source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Analyses of biodiversity, represented by species abundance and richness, are foundational to much ecological research and many conservation initiatives.

    “Analyses of biodiversity, represented by such measures as species abundance and richness, are foundational to much ecological research and many conservation initiatives.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Tree-based methods are well-suited to these tasks because they perform explicit feature ranking and are able to model nonlinear relationships between covariates and species distribution.

    “Tree-based methods are well-suited to these tasks because they perform explicit feature ranking (and thus feature selection) and are able to model nonlinear relationships between covariates and species distribution.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Security of rangers themselves is at stake; for example, the flight path of drones might be backtracked to reveal their location.

    “Security of rangers themselves is also at stake; for example, the flight path of drones might be backtracked to reveal their location.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Population counts without uncertainty estimation can lead to erroneous and potentially devastating conclusions.

    “population counts without uncertainty estimation can lead to erroneous and potentially devastating conclusions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Biases are not limited to geographical provenance: the type of sensors used, the species they depict, and the imbalance in the number of individuals observed per species must also be considered when training or using models to avoid potentially catastrophic drop-offs in accuracy.

    “Biases are not limited to the geographical provenance of images: the type of sensors used (RGB vs. infrared or thermal), the species they depict, and the imbalance in the number of individuals observed per species55,132 must also be considered when training or using models to avoid potentially catastrophic drop-offs in accuracy”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [55] Beery, S., Van Horn, G. & Perona, P. Recognition in terra incognita. in 2018 European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), 456–473 (2018). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [132] Van Horn, G. et al. The inaturalist species classification and detection dataset. in 2018 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 8769–8778 (2018). source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    The universality of ML is now strongly questioned and the inductive bias of traditional DL models is challenged by new approaches that bridge domain knowledge, fundamental laws, and data science.

    “Such universality of ML is now strongly questioned and the inductive bias of traditional DL models is challenged by new approaches that bridge domain knowledge, fundamental laws, and data science.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Machine and deep learning are becoming necessary accelerators for wildlife research and conservation actions in natural reserves.

    “Machine and deep learning are becoming necessary accelerators for wildlife research and conservation actions in natural reserves.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Without quality control measures, relying on model-based results is risky and could have difficult-to-evaluate impacts on research in animal ecology, as incorrect results hidden in a suboptimally trained model will become more difficult to detect.

    “Without such quality control measures, relying on model-based results is risky and could have difficult-to-evaluate impacts on research in animal ecology, as incorrect results hidden in a suboptimally trained model will become more and more difficult to detect.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Errors by models can lead to erroneous decisions on site that can be catastrophic for the population they are trying to preserve or for populations at the border of human/wildlife conflicts.

    “Computer scientists must be aware that errors by their models can lead to erroneous decisions on site that can be catastrophic for the population they are trying to preserve or for the populations that live at the border of human/wildlife conflicts.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Cloud computing services exist that forgo the need of hardware management, but they pose per-resource costs that quickly scale to several thousands of dollars per month for a single virtual machine.

    “Although cloud computing services exist that forgo the need of hardware management, they likewise pose per-resource costs that quickly scale to several thousands of dollars per month for a single virtual machine.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Models currently used in animal ecology are far from such a carbon footprint.

    “Even though the models currently used in animal ecology are far from such a carbon footprint”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Recently, it has been estimated that large, state-of-the-art models for understanding natural language emit as much carbon as several cars in their entire lifetime.

    “recently, it has been estimated that large, state-of-the-art models for understanding natural language emit as much carbon as several cars in their entire lifetime135.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [135] Strubell, E., Ganesh, A. & McCallum, A. Energy and policy considerations for deep learning in NLP. in Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 3645–3650 (2019). source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Opening up existing datasets, especially private-owned images acquired by non-professionals, is both a necessary and difficult challenge for the near future.

    “However, opening up existing datasets (and especially when using private-owned images acquired by non-professionals as in ref. 92) is both a necessary and difficult challenge for the near future.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [92] Parham, J., Crall, J., Stewart, C., Berger-Wolf, T. & Rubenstein, D. I. Animal population censusing at scale with citizen science and photographic identification. in AAAI Spring Symposium-Technical Report (2017).

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In some cases, it is imperative that the privacy of the data be preserved, for instance to avoid giving poachers access to locations of animals in near-real-time.

    “In some cases, it is imperative that the privacy of the data be preserved, for instance to avoid giving poachers access to locations of animals in near-real-time134.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [134] Lennox, R. J. et al. A novel framework to protect animal data in a world of ecosurveillance. BioScience 70, 468–476 (2020). source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Purchasing prices of such machines alone are often prohibitively high especially for budget-constrained conservation organizations; programming, running, and maintenance costs further add to the bill.

    “Purchasing prices of such machines alone are often prohibitively high especially for budget-constrained conservation organizations; programming, running, and maintenance costs further add to the bill.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Smaller models are not only less expensive to train and use, their lighter computational costs allow them to be run on smaller devices, opening opportunities for real-time ML on the edge.

    “Smaller models are not only less expensive to train and use, their lighter computational costs allow them to be run on smaller devices, opening opportunities for real-time ML “on the edge”—i.e., within the sensors themselves.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Fostering a culture of individual and cross-institutional data sharing in ecology will allow ML approaches to improve in robustness and accuracy.

    “Fostering a culture of individual and cross-institutional data sharing in ecology will allow ML approaches to improve in robustness and accuracy.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Estimations of models remain approximations and need to be treated as such.

    “The estimations of models remain approximations and need to be treated as such”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Premisecitation

    Transparency around the training data and the intended model usage is a necessity.

    “transparency around the training data and the intended model usage is a necessity133.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [133] Copas, K. et al. Training machines to improve species identification using GBIF-mediated datasets. in AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts, Vol. 2019, IN53C–0758 (2019).

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    State-of-the-art ML models are now being applied to many tasks in animal ecology and wildlife conservation.

    “State-of-the-art ML models are now being applied to many tasks in animal ecology and wildlife conservation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Environmental costs of AI are often disregarded, as energy consumption of large calculations is still considered an endless resource, assuming that the money to pay for it is available.

    “environmental costs of AI are often disregarded, as energy consumption of large calculations is still considered an endless resource (assuming that the money to pay for it is available).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Training and running models with millions of parameters on large volumes of data requires powerful, somewhat specialized hardware.

    “Training and running models with millions of parameters on large volumes of data requires powerful, somewhat specialized hardware.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    The ML and DL fields have focused mainly on black box models that learn correlations from data directly, and domain knowledge has been repeatedly ignored in favor of generic approaches.

    “The ML and DL fields have focused mainly on black box models that learn correlations from data directly, and domain knowledge has been repeatedly ignored in favor of generic approaches that could fit to any kind of dataset.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Many open imagery repositories such as Artportalen.se, Naturgucker.de, and Waarneming.nl collect images from specific regions, and most contributions on iNaturalist come from the Northern hemisphere.

    “For example, many open imagery repositories such as Artportalen.se, Naturgucker.de, and Waarneming.nl collect images from specific regions, and most contributions on iNaturalist132 (see Table 2) come from the Northern hemisphere.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [132] Van Horn, G. et al. The inaturalist species classification and detection dataset. in 2018 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 8769–8778 (2018). source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Laboratories rightly serve as the ultimate development space for such in-the-wild applications.

    “Thus, laboratories rightly serve as the ultimate development space for such in-the-wild applications.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    This line of interdisciplinary research is small but growing, with several studies published in recent years.

    “This line of interdisciplinary research is small but growing, with several studies published in recent years.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Ref. 139 incorporates knowledge about the distribution of species and photographer biases into a DL model for species classification in images and reports accuracy improvements of up to 12% in iNaturalist over a baseline without such priors.

    “Similarly ref. 139, incorporate knowledge about the distribution of species as well as photographer biases into a DL model for species classification in images and report accuracy improvements of up to 12% in iNaturalist over a baseline without such priors.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [139] Mac Aodha, O., Cole, E. & Perona, P. Presence-only geographical priors for fine-grained image classification. in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 9596–9606 (2019). source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The hybrid models paradigm is one of the most exciting avenues in modern ML and promises real collaboration between domains of application and ML, especially when coupled with algorithmic designs that allow interpretation and understanding of visual cues.

    “This “hybrid models” paradigm48,50 is one of the most exciting avenues in modern ML and promises real collaboration between domains of application and ML, especially when coupled with algorithmic designs that allow interpretation and understanding of the visual cues that are being used136.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [48] Reichstein, M. et al. Deep learning and process understanding for data-driven Earth system science. Nature 566, 195–204 (2019). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [50] Karpatne, A. et al. Theory-guided data science: A new paradigm for scientific discovery from data. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 29, 2318–2331 (2017). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [136] Samek, W., Montavon, G., Vedaldi, A., Hansen, L. K. & Müller, K.-R. Explainable AI: Interpreting, Explaining and Visualizing Deep Learning, Vol. 11700 (Springer Nature, 2019). source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The high level of control afforded by laboratory settings facilitated the rapid development of such tools, many of which are now being adopted for use in field studies of free-moving animals in complex natural environments.

    “The high level of control (e.g., of lighting conditions, sensor calibration, and environment) afforded by laboratory settings facilitated the rapid development of such tools, many of which are now being adopted for use in field studies of free-moving animals in complex natural environments75,142.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [75] Graving, J. M. et al. DeepPoseKit, a software toolkit for fast and robust animal pose estimation using deep learning. Elife 8, e47994 (2019). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [142] Joska, D. et al. AcinoSet: a 3D pose estimation dataset and baseline models for Cheetahs in the wild. 2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.13282 (IEEE, Xi’an, China, 2021). source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Ref. 140 used expert knowledge of park rangers to augment sparse and noisy records of poaching activity, improving predictions of poaching occurrence and enabling more efficient use of limited patrol resources in a Chinese nature reserve.

    “Finally ref. 140, used expert knowledge of park rangers to augment sparse and noisy records of poaching activity, thereby improving predictions of poaching occurrence and enabling more efficient use of limited patrol resources in a Chinese nature reserve.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [140] Gurumurthy, S. et al. Exploiting Data and Human Knowledge for Predicting Wildlife Poaching. in Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCAS Conference on Computing and Sustainable Societies, 1–8, https://doi.org/10.1145/3209811.3209879 (ACM, 2018). source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Statistical models for species richness and diversity are routinely used to estimate abundances and study species co-occurrence and interactions.

    “Statistical models for species richness and diversity are routinely used to estimate abundances and study species co-occurrence and interactions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Algorithmic insights gained in the lab can be transferred back into the wild-studies on short videos or camera traps can leverage lab-generated data that is arguably less diverse, but easier to control.

    “In addition, algorithmic insights gained in the lab can be transferred back into the wild—studies on short videos or camera traps can leverage lab-generated data that is arguably less diverse, but easier to control.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    This opens interesting research opportunities for the adaptation of lab-generated simulation to real-world conditions, similar to what has been observed in image synthesis for self driving and robotics.

    “This opens interesting research opportunities for the adaptation of lab-generated simulation to real-world conditions, similar to what has been observed in the field of image synthesis for self driving143 and robotics144 in the last decade.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [143] Chen, Q. & Koltun, V. Photographic image synthesis with cascaded refinement networks. in 2019 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 1511–1520 (2017). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [144] Lee, J., Hwangbo, J., Wellhausen, L., Koltun, V. & Hutter, M. Learning quadrupedal locomotion over challenging terrain. Sci. Robot. 5, eabc5986 (2020). source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    These approaches challenge the dogma of ML models learning exclusively from data and achieve more efficient model learning and enhanced plausibility of solutions.

    “These approaches challenge the dogma of ML models learning exclusively from data and achieve more efficient model learning (since base knowledge is available from the start and does not have to be re-learnt) and enhanced plausibility of the solutions (because the solution space can be constrained to a range of ecologically plausible outcomes).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Computer scientists have yet to integrate ecological knowledge such as underlying biological processes into machine learning models.

    “Computer scientists have yet to integrate ecological knowledge such as underlying biological processes into ML models, and the lack of transparency of current DL models has so far been a major obstacle to incorporating ML into ecological research.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Open challenges in species distribution modeling include increasing the scale of joint models geospatially, temporally, and taxonomically; building methods that can leverage multiple data types despite bias from non-uniform sampling strategies; incorporating ecological knowledge such as species dispersal and community composition; and expanding methods for evaluation.

    “Open challenges include increasing the scale of joint models geospatially, temporally, and taxonomically, building methods that can leverage multiple data types despite bias from non-uniform sampling strategies, incorporating ecological knowledge such as species dispersal and community composition, and expanding methods for the evaluation of these models.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [146] Beery, S., Cole, E., Parker, J., Perona, P. & Winner, K. Species distribution modeling for machine learning practitioners: a review. in Proceedings of the 4th ACM SIGCAS Conference on Computing and Sustainable Societies (2021). source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The vision described in the paper cannot be achieved without interdisciplinary thinking.

    “Finally, we wish to re-emphasize that the vision described here cannot be achieved without interdisciplinary thinking: for all these exciting opportunities, processing big ecological data is necessitating analytical techniques of such complexity that no single ecologist can be expected to have all the technical expertise (plus domain knowledge) required to carry out groundbreaking studies65.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    The GeoLifeCLEF task is complex because only positive counts are provided, no absence data are available, and predictions are counted as correct if the ground truth species is among the 30 predicted with highest confidence.

    “The task is complex: only positive counts are provided, no absence data are available, and predictions are counted as correct if the ground truth species is among the 30 predicted with highest confidence.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Improvements from machine learning and new generation sensors require ever-closer cooperation between ecologists and machine learning specialists, since recent approaches are more complex than ever and require strict quality control and detailed design knowledge.

    “Although often spectacular, such improvements require ever-closer cooperation between ecologists and ML specialists, since recent approaches are more complex than ever and require strict quality control and detailed design knowledge.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The lack of transparency of current deep learning models has so far been a major obstacle to incorporating machine learning into ecological research.

    “Computer scientists have yet to integrate ecological knowledge such as underlying biological processes into ML models, and the lack of transparency of current DL models has so far been a major obstacle to incorporating ML into ecological research.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
110 of 110
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Community science efforts increase public engagement in science and conservation.

    “Community science efforts also increase public engagement in science and conservation.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Machine and deep learning are necessary accelerators for wildlife research and conservation actions in natural reserves.

    “Machine and deep learning are becoming necessary accelerators for wildlife research and conservation actions in natural reserves.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Environmental costs of AI are often disregarded because energy consumption of large calculations is still considered an endless resource.

    “environmental costs of AI are often disregarded, as energy consumption of large calculations is still considered an endless resource (assuming that the money to pay for it is available).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    GeoLifeCLEF curated a dataset of 1.9 million iNaturalist observations from North America and France depicting over 31,000 species, together with environmental predictors, and asked users to predict a ranked list of likely species per geospatial grid cell.

    “GeoLifeCLEF curated a dataset of 1.9 million iNaturalist observations from North America and France depicting over 31,000 species, together with environmental predictors (land cover, altitude, climatic data, etc.), and asked users to predict a ranked list of likely species per geospatial grid cell.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The winners of the 2021 GeoLifeCLEF edition achieved only an approximate 26% top-30 accuracy.

    “This challenging task remains an open challenge—the winners of the 2021 edition achieved only an approximate 26% top-30 accuracy.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Animal ecology and wildlife conservation need to make sense of large and ever-increasing streams of data to provide accurate estimations of populations, understand animal behavior and fight against poaching and loss of biodiversity.

    “Animal ecology and wildlife conservation need to make sense of large and ever-increasing streams of data to provide accurate estimations of populations, understand animal behavior and fight against poaching and loss of biodiversity.”
6 of 6

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The algorithm-hardware codesign solution for 2D TinyML workloads decreases the need for data transfer between the image sensor and the accelerator for CNN processing, resulting in lower energy and bandwidth requirements.

    “This decreases the need for data transfer between the image sensor and the accelerator for Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) processing, resulting in lower energy and bandwidth requirements.”

    From A Comprehensive Survey on TinyML (2023) · cites this paper as [87]

    The 'What can we focus on now?' section discusses smaller models running within sensors, but does not describe algorithm–hardware codesign or reduced data transfer between an image sensor and a CNN accelerator. Searches for those terms and for TinyML found no passage addressing the claimed energy and bandwidth reductions. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The two CNN models implemented using PIP yield considerable compression while reducing data rates and power consumption.

    “The authors in [87] also offer two CNN models that are implemented using PIP (pixel-in-pixel), which yields considerable compression while reducing data rates and power consumption.”

    From A Comprehensive Survey on TinyML (2023) · cites this paper as [87]

    The Remote sensing section discusses on-board processing to conserve power and reduce transmitted data, and What can we focus on now? discusses the lower computational costs of smaller models. Neither passage addresses two CNN models implemented using pixel-in-pixel (PIP) or reports their compression, data-rate, and power-consumption results. Searches for PIP and those results found no decisive passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Bat-counting claim conflicts with cited study title

    Minor

    The text says human counts tend to underestimate bats emerging from caves, but the cited study's title says thermal imaging found colonies significantly smaller than previously estimated, implying the earlier estimates were too high.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 162 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Sugai, L. S. M., Silva, T. S. F., Ribeiro Jr, J. W. & Llusia, D. Terrestrial passive acoustic monitoring: review and perspectives. BioScience 69, 15–25 (2019). · DOI
  2. Kellenberger, B., Veen., T., Folmer, E. & Tuia, D. 21,000 birds in 4.5 hours: efficient large-scale seabird detection with machine learning. Remote Sens. Ecol. Conserv. https://doi.org/10.1002/rse2.200 (2021). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tuia, D., Kellenberger, B., Beery, S., Costelloe, B. R., Zuffi, S., Risse, B., Mathis, A., Mathis, M. W., van Langevelde, F., Burghardt, T., Kays, R., Klinck, H., Wikelski, M., Couzin, I. D., van Horn, G., Crofoot, M. C., Stewart, C. V., & Berger-Wolf, T.
Affiliations
  • École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
  • California Institute of Technology (US)
  • University of Konstanz (DE)
  • Istituto di Matematica Applicata e Tecnologie Informatiche (IT)
  • University of Münster (DE)
  • University of Bristol (GB)
  • North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences (US)
  • Cornell University (US)
  • Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (US)
  • The Ohio State University (US)
Corresponding author
Tuia, Devis
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2022-02-09
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
792-792
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4210883322
Cited by
740
References
162
Citations by year
2026: 189 · 2025: 192 · 2024: 156 · 2023: 144 · 2022: 59
FWCI
12.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • CNR ExploRA (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • KOPS (University of Konstanz) (submittedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1745301, IIS 1514174, IOS 1250895, 1453555, 1550853)
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (EXC 2117-422037984)
  • Fondation Bertarelli
  • David and Lucile Packard Foundation (2016-65130)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecological Modeling › Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
Keywords
machine learning, wildlife conservation, animal ecology, low-cost sensors, ecological data, hybrid modeling, domain knowledge integration, ecological modeling, interdisciplinary collaboration, data science education
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Animals, Animals, Wild, Automation, Conservation of Natural Resources, Ecology, Models, Theoretical, Ecosystem, Knowledge

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review