Perspectives in machine learning for wildlife conservation
Open accessAbstract
Inexpensive and accessible sensors are accelerating data acquisition in animal ecology. These technologies hold great potential for large-scale ecological understanding, but are limited by current processing approaches which inefficiently distill data into relevant information. We argue that animal ecologists can capitalize on large datasets generated by modern sensors by combining machine learning approaches with domain knowledge. Incorporating machine learning into ecological workflows could improve inputs for ecological models and lead to integrated hybrid modeling tools. This approach will require close interdisciplinary collaboration to ensure the quality of novel approaches and train a new generation of data scientists in ecology and conservation.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This Perspective argues that animal ecology and conservation can exploit modern sensor data by integrating machine learning with ecological domain knowledge, rather than applying off-the-shelf ML. It reviews success stories across detection, re-identification, pose estimation, environmental reconstruction, and biodiversity modeling, and outlines attention points for responsible, interdisciplinary use.
Key findings
- Sensor expansion creates a data deluge: Agouti hosted 31 million images in August 2021 with only 1.5 million annotated, while Wildlife Insights was automatically processing 17 million camera trap images in August 2021; ML analysis cost reductions are estimated between 2 and 10×.
- ML/DL improve detection and identification: large mammal detection in Kuzikus improved from 20% to 80% recall at 75% precision; chimpanzee face recognition on 23 individuals and 1 million images achieved >90% accuracy (DL 84% vs. human novices 20% and experts 42%); tiger re-identification exceeded 90% across 92 tigers and 8,000 video clips.
- Domain-informed/hybrid models improve performance: Context R-CNN increased mean species identification precision on Snapshot Serengeti by 17.9%; taxonomic and locational priors improved plant classification by about 5%; distribution and photographer-bias priors improved iNaturalist accuracy by up to 12%; expert ranger knowledge improved poaching predictions.
- Operational examples show scale: MegaDetector was used by Wildlife Protection Solutions across over 400 connected cameras in 18 countries, analyzing over 900K images in a year and detecting at least one real threat per week; Idaho Department of Fish and Game automated 9.5 million of 11 million camera trap images, halved labeling costs, and reduced a ~5-year labeling lag.
Methods
- Perspective/narrative review, not a primary empirical study; it synthesizes literature and case studies at the interface of machine learning, animal ecology, and wildlife conservation.
- Covers sensor types including camera traps, bioacoustic sensors, on-animal bio-loggers, UAVs, satellites, and community science, and ML tasks including detection/classification, individual re-identification, pose/3D reconstruction, environmental reconstruction, and species richness/interaction modeling.
- Main analysis is qualitative synthesis with cited performance examples; no systematic search strategy, meta-analysis, or new dataset is described.
Limitations
- Stated by the paper: geographic, sensor, and species biases can limit model generalization; quality control and uncertainty estimation are urgently needed; open data sharing carries ethical/privacy risks such as poacher access; and ML has environmental and financial costs.
- Stated by the paper: community science labels can be noisy or erroneous; drone flights below 150 m can significantly affect mammal behavior; passive acoustic monitoring and camera traps face data-scale, domain-shift, and labeled-data scarcity challenges.
- Evident from the text: as a Perspective, it is not a systematic review and reports selected examples rather than exhaustive evidence; it presents no primary data collection or formal quantitative synthesis.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 101 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingreasoning
Skillful applications of state-of-the-art machine learning concepts for animal ecology now exist, thanks to corporate and research efforts.
“We observe that skillful applications of state-of-the-art ML concepts for animal ecology now exist, thanks to corporate (e.g., Wildlife Insights) and research (AIDE, MegaDetector, DeepLabCut) efforts, but that there is still much room (and need) for genuinely new concepts pushed by interdisciplinary research, in particular towards hybrid models and new habitat distribution models at scale.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Machine learning has emerged as a promising means of connecting big data and actionable ecological insights.
“ML has emerged as a promising means of connecting the dots between big data and actionable ecological insights29”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [29] Christin, S., Hervet, É. & Lecomte, N. Applications for deep learning in ecology. Methods Ecol. Evolution 10, 1632–1644 (2019). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
There is a mismatch between the ever-growing volume of raw measures acquired for ecological studies and our ability to process and analyze this multi-source data to derive conclusive ecological insights rapidly and at scale.
“There is a mismatch between the ever-growing volume of raw measures (videos, images, audio recordings) acquired for ecological studies and our ability to process and analyze this multi-source data to derive conclusive ecological insights rapidly and at scale.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Use of machine learning massively reduces analysis costs, with reduction factors estimated between 2 and 10.
“use of ML also massively reduces analysis costs, with reduction factors estimated between 2 and 1042.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [42] Eikelboom, J. A. J. et al. Improving the precision and accuracy of animal population estimates with aerial image object detection. Methods Ecol. Evolution 10, 1875–1887 (2019). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Large mammal detection in the Kuzikus reserve in 2014 was improved from a recall rate of 20% to 80% for a common 75% precision rate.
“large mammal detection in the Kuzikus reserve in 2014 was improved significantly by improving the detection methodologies, from a recall rate of 20%35 to 80%37 (for a common 75% precision rate).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [35] Rey, N., Volpi, M., Joost, S. & Tuia, D. Detecting animals in African savanna with UAVs and the crowds. Remote Sens. Environ. 200, 341–351 (2017). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [37] Kellenberger, B., Marcos, D. & Tuia, D. When a few clicks make all the difference: improving weakly-supervised wildlife detection in UAV images. in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (2019). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Significant error reduction of machine learning and deep learning with respect to traditional generalized regression models has been reported routinely for species richness and diversity estimation.
“Significant error reduction of ML and DL with respect to traditional generalized regression models has been reported routinely for species richness and diversity estimation33,34.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [33] Pichler, M., Boreux, V., Klein, A.-M., Schleuning, M. & Hartig, F. Machine learning algorithms to infer trait-matching and predict species interactions in ecological networks. Methods Ecol. Evolution 11, 281–293 (2020). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [34] Knudby, A., LeDrew, E. & Brenning, A. Predictive mapping of reef fish species richness, diversity and biomass in Zanzibar using IKONOS imagery and machine-learning techniques. Remote Sens. Environ. 114, 1230–1241 (2010). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Many animals are highly habitual and territorial, leading to very strong correlations between data taken days or even weeks apart from a single sensor.
“many animals are highly habitual and territorial, leading to very strong correlations between data taken days or even weeks apart from a single sensor52.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [52] Beery, S., Wu, G., Rathod, V., Votel, R. & Huang, J. Context R-CNN: long term temporal context for per-camera object detection. in 2020 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 13075–13085 (2020). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Problems related to lack of generality across geographies, day/night acquisition, or sensors are still major obstacles to production-ready accurate systems.
“problems related to lack of generality across geographies, day/night acquisition, or sensors are still major obstacles to production-ready accurate systems55.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [55] Beery, S., Van Horn, G. & Perona, P. Recognition in terra incognita. in 2018 European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), 456–473 (2018). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning
Stationary sensors' data is highly spatiotemporally correlated because of their stationary nature.
“However, because of their stationary nature, their data is highly spatiotemporally correlated.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Recent research shows that machine learning models trained on community data can perform as well as annotators.
“Recent research shows that ML models trained on community data can perform as well as annotators91.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [91] Torney, C. J. et al. A comparison of deep learning and citizen science techniques for counting wildlife in aerial survey images. Methods Ecol. Evolution 10, 779–787 (2019). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning
A significant challenge when utilizing passive acoustic monitoring is the lack of large and diverse labeled datasets.
“The third challenge is the lack of large and diverse labeled datasets.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Recent advances in machine learning methodology could accelerate and enhance various stages of the traditional ecological research pipeline.
“Recent advances in ML methodology could accelerate and enhance various stages of the traditional ecological research pipeline”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
A significant challenge when utilizing passive acoustic monitoring is the size of data acquired.
“First and foremost among these challenges is the size of data acquired.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Animal diversity is declining at an unprecedented rate.
“Animal diversity is declining at an unprecedented rate1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [1] Ceballos, G., Ehrlich, P. R. & Raven, P. H. Vertebrates on the brink as indicators of biological annihilation and the sixth mass extinction. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 13596–13602 (2020). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Models trained on community science data can be used to bring image recognition tasks to larger scale and complexity, from filtering out images without animals in camera trap sequences to identifying species or even individuals.
“Models trained this way can then be used to bring image recognition tasks to larger scale and complexity, from filtering out images without animals in camera trap sequences to identifying species or even individuals.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
Wildbook's technology enabled the Great Grevy's Rally, the first-ever full species census for the endangered Grevy's zebra in Kenya, using photographs captured by the public.
“Wildbook’s technology also enabled the Great Grevy’s Rally, the first-ever full species census for the endangered Grevy’s zebra in Kenya, using photographs captured by the public.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The scale and speed of analysis required in both WPS and IDFG cases would not be possible without an AI-based solution.
“The scale and speed of analysis required in both cases would not be possible without such an AI-based solution.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
Using MegaDetector halved IDFG's labeling costs.
“Using the Megadetector halved their labeling costs”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisenone given
WPS detect at least one real threat per week across their camera network.
“They help protected areas detect and respond to threats as they occur, and detect at least one real threat per week across their camera network.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisereasoning
WPS use the MegaDetector API in real-time to detect threats to wildlife in the form of unauthorized humans or vehicles in protected areas.
“WPS use the MegaDetector API in real-time to detect threats to wildlife in the form of unauthorized humans or vehicles in protected areas.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisereasoning
With MegaDetector integrated, IDFG fully automated analysis of 9.5 million of those images, using model confidence to direct human labeling to images containing animals of interest.
“with the MegaDetector integrated into their data processing and analysis pipeline, they were able to fully automate the analysis of 9.5 million of those images, using model confidence to help direct human labeling effort to images containing animals of interest.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
IDFG collected 11 million camera trap images from their wolf cameras last year.
“They collected 11 million camera trap images from their wolf cameras last year”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
Detecting and classifying animal species with DL for population estimates is becoming increasingly popular for images, acoustic spectrograms, and videos.
“For these reasons, detecting and classifying animal species with DL for the purpose of population estimates is becoming increasingly popular for images52,53, acoustic spectrograms95, and videos96.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [52] Beery, S., Wu, G., Rathod, V., Votel, R. & Huang, J. Context R-CNN: long term temporal context for per-camera object detection. in 2020 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 13075–13085 (2020). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [53] Norouzzadeh, M. S. et al. Automatically identifying, counting, and describing wild animals in camera-trap images with deep learning. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E5716–E5725 (2018). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [95] Mac Aodha, O. et al. Bat detective–deep learning tools for bat acoustic signal detection. PLoS Computat. Biol. 14, e1005995 (2018). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Computer vision recently emerged as a powerful alternative for automatic individual identification.
“Similar to counting and reconstruction (see next section), computer vision recently emerged as a powerful alternative for automatic individual identification54,98–100.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 4 sources checked- cites [54] Schneider, S., Taylor, G. W., Linquist, S. & Kremer, S. C. Past, present and future approaches using computer vision for animal re-identification from camera trap data. Methods Ecol. Evolution 10, 461–470 (2019). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [98] Vidal, M., Wolf, N., Rosenberg, B., Harris, B. P. & Mathis, A. Perspectives on Individual Animal Identification from Biology and Computer Vision. Integr. Comp. Biol. 61, 900–916 https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icab107 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [99] Berger-Wolf, T. Y. et al. Wildbook: crowdsourcing, computer vision, and data science for conservation. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1710.08880 (2017).
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [100] Parham, J. et al. An animal detection pipeline for identification. in IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), 1075–1083 (IEEE, 2018). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Accuracy exceeded 90% in a study of 92 tigers across 8000 video clips.
“for example, accuracy exceeded 90% in a study of 92 tigers across 8000 video clips103.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [103] Li, S., Li, J., Tang, H., Qian, R. & Lin, W. ATRW: a benchmark for Amur tiger re-identification in the wild. in 2020 ACM International Conference on Multimedia, 2590–2598 (2020). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning
3D shape recovery and pose estimation of animals can provide valuable, non-invasive insights on wild species in their natural environment.
“3D shape recovery and pose estimation of animals can provide valuable, non-invasive insights on wild species in their natural environment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Conventional and more recently DL-based methods have reached strong performance for specific taxa, especially across small populations.
“Yet, conventional101 and more recently DL-based38,54,102 methods have reached strong performance for specific taxa, especially across small populations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [101] Weideman, H. et al. Extracting identifying contours for African elephants and humpback whales using a learned appearance model. in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV) (2020). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [38] Schofield, D. et al. Chimpanzee face recognition from videos in the wild using deep learning. Sci. Adv. 5, eaaw0736 (2019). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [54] Schneider, S., Taylor, G. W., Linquist, S. & Kremer, S. C. Past, present and future approaches using computer vision for animal re-identification from camera trap data. Methods Ecol. Evolution 10, 461–470 (2019). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning
Identifying individuals from images is even more challenging than species recognition, since distinctive body patterns might be subtle or not sufficiently visible due to occlusion, motion blur, or overhead viewpoint.
“Identifying individuals from images is even more challenging than species recognition, since the distinctive body patterns of individuals might be subtle or not be sufficiently visible due to occlusion, motion blur, or overhead viewpoint in the case of aerial imagery.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Extracting a dense set of body surface points is possible, as shown where DensePose was extended to chimpanzees.
“Extracting a dense set of body surface points is also possible, as elegantly shown in ref. 106, where the DensePose technique originally developed for humans was extended to chimpanzees.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [106] Sanakoyeu, A., Khalidov, V., McCarthy, M. S., Vedaldi, A. & Neverova, N. Transferring dense pose to proximal animal classes. in 2020 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 5233–5242 (2020). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
3D spatial reconstructions shed light on the impact of forest structures on bat behavior.
“3D spatial reconstructions shed light on the impact of forest structures on bat behavior115.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [115] Froidevaux, J. S. P., Zellweger, F., Bollmann, K., Jones, G. & Obrist, M. K. From field surveys to LiDAR: shining a light on how bats respond to forest structure. Remote Sens. Environ. 175, 242–250 (2016). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Studies have shown that animal observations like trajectories highly benefit from additional cues included in the environmental context.
“Studies have shown that animal observations like trajectories highly benefit from additional cues included in the environmental context112.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [112] Haalck, L., Mangan, M., Webb, B. & Risse, B. Towards image-based animal tracking in natural environments using a freely moving camera. J. Neurosci. methods 330, 108455 (2020). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning
Cues from additional external sensors are usually integrated to achieve satisfactory environmental reconstructions from video data.
“As a consequence, cues from additional external sensors are usually integrated to achieve satisfactory environmental reconstructions from video data123.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [123] Ferrer, J., Elibol, A., Delaunoy, O., Gracias, N. & Garcia, R. Large-area photo-mosaics using global alignment and navigation data. in Mts/IEEE Oceans Conference, 1–9 (2007). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Tree-based techniques have been used to predict species interactions: regression trees significantly outperformed classical generalized linear models in predicting plant-pollinator interactions.
“Tree-based techniques have also been used to predict species interactions: for example, regression trees significantly outperformed classical generalized linear models in predicting plant-pollinator interactions33.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [33] Pichler, M., Boreux, V., Klein, A.-M., Schleuning, M. & Hartig, F. Machine learning algorithms to infer trait-matching and predict species interactions in ecological networks. Methods Ecol. Evolution 11, 281–293 (2020). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
A variety of inappropriate camera motions or environmental geometries can result in critical configurations which cannot be resolved by existing optimization schemes.
“Last but not least, a variety of inappropriate camera motions or environmental geometries can result in so-called critical configurations which cannot be resolved by the existing optimization schemes122.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [122] Wu, C. Critical configurations for radial distortion self-calibration. in 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 25–32 (2014). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Unconstrained continuous video recordings at potentially high frame-rates result in large image sets which require efficient image processing.
“For example, unconstrained continuous video recordings at potentially high frame-rates will result in large image sets which require efficient image processing117.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [117] Haalck, L. & Risse, B. Embedded dense camera trajectories in multi-video image mosaics by geodesic interpolation-based reintegration. in 2021 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), 1849–1858 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Ambiguous environmental appearances and structural errors such as drift accumulate over time and decrease reconstruction quality.
“Moreover, ambiguous environmental appearances and structural errors such as drift accumulate over time and therefore decrease the reconstruction quality118.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [118] Schonberger, J. L. & Frahm, J.-M. Structure-from-motion revisited. in 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 4104–4113 (2016). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning
Applying these techniques to natural wildlife imagery is not trivial.
“However, applying these techniques to natural wildlife imagery is not trivial.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisereasoning
Most ecological datasets suffer from some degree of geographic bias.
“Most ecological datasets suffer from some degree of geographic bias.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Modern ML has rapidly changed laboratory-based non-invasive observation of animals.
“In recent years, modern ML has rapidly changed laboratory-based non-invasive observation of animals76,105.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [76] Mathis, A., Schneider, S., Lauer, J. & Mathis, M. W. A primer on motion capture with deep learning: principles, pitfalls, and perspectives. Neuron 108, 44–65 (2020). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [105] Mathis, M. W. & Mathis, A. Deep learning tools for the measurement of animal behavior in neuroscience. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 60, 1–11 (2020). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
By integrating image features over long time spans up to a month, Context R-CNN increases mean species identification precision in the Snapshot Serengeti dataset by 17.9%.
“By integrating image features over long time spans (up to a month), the model is able to increase mean species identification precision in the Snapshot Serengeti dataset137 by 17.9%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [137] Swanson, A. et al. Snapshot Serengeti, high-frequency annotated camera trap images of 40 mammalian species in an African savanna. Sci. data 2, 1–14 (2015). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Deep learning methods have started to be employed to model species' ecological niches, facilitated by the development of machine-learning-ready datasets such as GeoLifeCLEF.
“Recently, DL methods have also started to be employed to model species’ ecological niches82,145, facilitated by the development of machine-learning-ready datasets such as GeoLifeCLEF.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [82] Deneu, B., Servajean, M., Botella, C. & Joly, A. Evaluation of deep species distribution models using environment and co-occurrences. in International Conference of the Cross-Language Evaluation Forum for European Languages, 213–225 (Springer, 2019). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [145] Botella, C., Joly, A., Bonnet, P., Munoz, F. & Monestiez, P. Jointly estimating spatial sampling effort and habitat suitability for multiple species from opportunistic presence-only data. Methods Ecol. Evolution 12, 933–945 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Neuroscience studies in particular have embraced novel tools for motion tracking, pose estimation, and behavioral classification.
“Neuroscience studies in particular have embraced novel tools for motion tracking, pose estimation (Fig. 1d, e), and behavioral classification (e.g., ref. 141).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [141] Datta, S., Anderson, D., Branson, K., Perona, P. & Leifer, A. Computational neuroethology: a call to action. Neuron 104, 11–24 (2019). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In another example, hierarchical structure of taxonomies and locational priors are leveraged to constrain plant species classification from iNaturalist in Switzerland, leading to improvements of state-of-the-art models of about 5%.
“In another example138, the hierarchical structure of taxonomies, as well as locational priors, are leveraged to constrain plant species classification from iNaturalist in Switzerland, leading to improvements of state-of-the-art models of about 5%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [138] de Lutio, R. et al. Digital taxonomist: identifying plant species in community scientists’ photographs. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 182, 112–121 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
Processing big ecological data necessitates analytical techniques of such complexity that no single ecologist can be expected to have all the technical expertise (plus domain knowledge) required to carry out groundbreaking studies.
“Finally, we wish to re-emphasize that the vision described here cannot be achieved without interdisciplinary thinking: for all these exciting opportunities, processing big ecological data is necessitating analytical techniques of such complexity that no single ecologist can be expected to have all the technical expertise (plus domain knowledge) required to carry out groundbreaking studies65.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [65] Williams, H. J. et al. Optimizing the use of biologgers for movement ecology research. J. Anim. Ecol. 89, 186–206 (2020). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The GeoLifeCLEF task remains an open challenge.
“This challenging task remains an open challenge—the winners of the 2021 edition achieved only an approximate 26% top-30 accuracy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The winners of the 2021 GeoLifeCLEF edition achieved only an approximate 26% top-30 accuracy.
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 74
- May combine two claims. 60
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenAn interdisciplinary community of computer scientists and ecologists is emerging.
“However, an interdisciplinary community of computer scientists and ecologists is emerging, which we hope will tackle this technological and societal challenge together.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationCentral challenges to efficient data analysis are the sheer volume of data generated by modern collection methods and the heterogeneous nature of many ecological datasets, which preclude the use of simple automated analysis techniques.
“Central challenges to efficient data analysis are the sheer volume of data generated by modern collection methods and the heterogeneous nature of many ecological datasets, which preclude the use of simple automated analysis techniques26.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [26] Farley, S. S., Dawson, A., Goring, S. J. & Williams, J. W. Situating ecology as a big-data science: current advances, challenges, and solutions. BioScience 68, 563–576 (2018). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenCurrent processing approaches inefficiently distill sensor data into relevant information.
“but are limited by current processing approaches which inefficiently distill data into relevant information”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenInexpensive and accessible sensors are accelerating data acquisition in animal ecology.
“Inexpensive and accessible sensors are accelerating data acquisition in animal ecology.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationDeep learning models have shown superior performance across the majority of machine learning use cases.
“a family of highly versatile ML models based on artificial neural networks that have shown superior performance across the majority of ML use cases”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [32] LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y. & Hinton, G. Deep learning. Nature 521, 436–444 (2015). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationHybrid models leveraging both deep learning and bio-physical models tend to be less data-intensive, avoid incoherent predictions, and are generally more interpretable than purely data-driven models.
“such hybrid models tend to be less data-intensive, avoid incoherent predictions, and are generally more interpretable than purely data-driven models.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [48] Reichstein, M. et al. Deep learning and process understanding for data-driven Earth system science. Nature 566, 195–204 (2019). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [49] Camps-Valls, G., Tuia, D., Zhu, X. X. & Reichstein, M. Deep Learning for the Earth Sciences: A Comprehensive Approach to Remote Sensing, Climate Science and Geosciences (Wiley & Sons, 2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [50] Karpatne, A. et al. Theory-guided data science: A new paradigm for scientific discovery from data. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 29, 2318–2331 (2017). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCompared to camera traps, passive acoustic monitoring is mostly unaffected by light and weather conditions, senses the environment omnidirectionally, and tends to be cost-effective when data needs to be collected at large spatiotemporal scales with high resolution.
“Compared to camera traps, PAM is mostly unaffected by light and weather conditions (some factors like wind still play a role), senses the environment omnidirectionally, and tends to be cost-effective when data needs to be collected at large spatiotemporal scales with high resolution60.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [60] Wood, C. M. et al. Detecting small changes in populations at landscape scales: a bioacoustic site-occupancy framework. Ecol. Indic. 98, 492–507 (2019). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningThe viability of community science services may be limited depending on the task and oftentimes substantial efforts are required to verify volunteer-annotated data.
“However, it is prudent to note that the viability of community science services may be limited depending on the task and that oftentimes substantial efforts are required to verify volunteer-annotated data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationVarious supervised machine learning methods have shown potential in automating behavior analysis from accelerometer data, identifying behavioral state from trajectories, and predicting animal movement.
“Various supervised ML methods have shown their potential in automating behavior analysis from accelerometer data68,69, identifying behavioral state from trajectories70, and predicting animal movement71.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [68] Browning, E. et al. Predicting animal behaviour using deep learning: GPS data alone accurately predict diving in seabirds. Methods Ecol. Evolution 9, 681–692 (2018). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [69] Liu, Z. Y.-C. et al. Deep learning accurately predicts white shark locomotor activity from depth data. Anim. Biotelemetry 7, 1–13 (2019). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [70] Wang, G. Machine learning for inferring animal behavior from location and movement data. Ecol. Inform. 49, 69–76 (2019). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationWhile machine learning has been extensively applied to camera trap images, its application to long-term passive acoustic monitoring datasets is still in its infancy and the first deep-learning-based studies are only starting to appear.
“While ML has been extensively applied to camera trap images, its application to long-term PAM datasets is still in its infancy and the first DL-based studies are only starting to appear”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [61] Kahl, S., Wood, C. M., Eibl, M. & Klinck, H. Birdnet: a deep learning solution for avian diversity monitoring. Ecol. Inform. 61, 101236 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationFlying at lower altitudes, for example lower than 150 m, can have a significant impact on group and individual behavior of mammals, although the severity of wildlife disturbance from drone deployments depends heavily on the focal species, the equipment used, and characteristics of the drone flight.
“A recent study80 showed that flying at lower altitudes (e.g., lower than 150 m) can have a significant impact on group and individual behavior of mammals, although the severity of wildlife disturbance from drone deployments will depend heavily on the focal species, the equipment used, and characteristics of the drone flight (such as approach speed and altitude)81”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [80] Schroeder, N. M., Panebianco, A., Gonzalez Musso, R. & Carmanchahi, P. An experimental approach to evaluate the potential of drones in terrestrial mammal research: a gregarious ungulate as a study model. R. Soc. open Sci. 7, 191482 (2020). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [81] Bennitt, E., Bartlam-Brooks, H. L. A., Hubel, T. Y. & Wilson, A. M. Terrestrial mammalian wildlife responses to Unmanned Aerial Systems approaches. Sci. Rep. 9, 1–10 (2019). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationOn-animal sensors are the most common remote sensing devices deployed in animal ecology.
“On-animal sensors are the most common remote sensing devices deployed in animal ecology10.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [10] Kays, R., Crofoot, M. C., Jetz, W. & Wikelski, M. Terrestrial animal tracking as an eye on life and planet. Science 348, aaa2478 (2015). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe inherent complexity of soundscapes requires noise-robust algorithms that generalize well and can separate and identify many animal sounds of interest from confounding natural and anthropogenic signals in a wide variety of acoustic environments.
“Second, the inherent complexity of soundscapes requires noise-robust algorithms that generalize well and can separate and identify many animal sounds of interest from confounding natural and anthropogenic signals in a wide variety of acoustic environments62.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [62] Stowell, D., Wood, M. D., Pamuła, H., Stylianou, Y. & Glotin, H. Automatic acoustic detection of birds through deep learning: the first bird audio detection challenge. Methods Ecol. Evolution 10, 368–380 (2019). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningIntegrating ecological domain knowledge into machine learning methods is essential to designing models that are accurate in the way they describe animal life.
“integrating ecological domain knowledge into ML methods is essential to designing models that are accurate in the way they describe animal life.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningThe challenging nature of ecological data, compounded by the size of datasets generated by novel sensors and the ever-increasing complexity of state-of-the-art machine learning methods, favors a collaborative approach that harnesses the expertise of both the machine learning and animal ecology communities, rather than an application of off-the-shelf machine learning methodologies to ecological挑战.
“We believe that the challenging nature of ecological data, compounded by the size of the datasets generated by novel sensors and the ever-increasing complexity of state-of-the-art ML methods, favor a collaborative approach that harnesses the expertise of both the ML and animal ecology communities, rather than an application of off-the-shelf ML methodologies to ecological challenges.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenIncreased scale of available data due to de-siloing efforts from organizations like Wildlife Insights and LILA.science will help increase machine learning accuracy and robustness across regions and taxa.
“The increased scale of available data due to de-siloing efforts from organizations like Wildlife Insights (www.wildlifeinsights.org) and LILA.science (www.lila.science) will help increase ML accuracy and robustness across regions and taxa.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenThe Great Grevy's Rally was hosted for the first time in January 2016 and has become a regular event held every other year.
“Hosted for the first time in January 2016, it has become a regular event, held every other year.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenSensor data has the potential to unlock ecological understanding on a scale difficult to imagine in the recent past.
“The sensor data described in the previous section has the potential to unlock ecological understanding on a scale difficult to imagine in the recent past.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenHundreds of people capture approximately 50,000 images over the 2-day Great Grevy's Rally event.
“Hundreds of people, from school children and park rangers, to Nairobi families and international tourists, embark on a mission to photograph Grevy’s zebras across its range in Kenya, capturing ~50,000 images over the 2-day event.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenWildbook data has become the basis for IUCN Red List global population numbers for several species.
“Wildbook data has become the basis for the IUCN Red List global population numbers for several species”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisereasoningUsing volunteer-acquired images provides a substantial increase in the number of images and the chances of photographing species or single individuals in different regions, poses, and viewing angles.
“it provides a substantial increase in the number of images and the chances of photographing species or single individuals in different regions, poses, and viewing angles.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe Great Grevy's Rally is a successful demonstration of the power of community science-based wildlife monitoring.
“The Great Grevy’s Rally, a community science-based wildlife census effort occurring every 2 years in Kenya92, is a successful demonstration of the power of community science-based wildlife monitoring.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [92] Parham, J., Crall, J., Stewart, C., Berger-Wolf, T. & Rubenstein, D. I. Animal population censusing at scale with citizen science and photographic identification. in AAAI Spring Symposium-Technical Report (2017).
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningWildbook supports collaborative mark-recapture, molecular ecology, and social ecology studies, especially where community science and artificial intelligence can help scale-up projects.
“Wildbook supports collaborative mark-recapture, molecular ecology, and social ecology studies, especially where community science and artificial intelligence can help scale-up projects.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningThe Great Grevy's Rally has become the foundation of the Kenya Wildlife Service's Grevy's zebra endangered species management policy and generates the official IUCN Red List population numbers for the species.
“The Great Grevy’s Rally has become the foundation of the Kenya Wildlife Service’s Grevy’s zebra endangered species management policy and generates the official IUCN Red List population numbers for the species.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningAnnotator errors include misdetected or mislabeled animals due to annotator fatigue or insufficient knowledge, and systematic errors from adversarial annotators.
“This is due to annotator errors, including misdetected or mislabeled animals due to annotator fatigue or insufficient knowledge about the annotation task, as well as systematic errors from adversarial annotators.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenWildbook is an open-source software platform that blends structured wildlife research with artificial intelligence, community science, and computer vision to speed population analysis and develop new insights to help conservation.
“Wildbook, a project of the non-profit Wild Me, is an open-source software platform that blends structured wildlife research with artificial intelligence, community science, and computer vision to speed population analysis and develop new insights to help conservation”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisereasoningFor simple tasks like animal detection, community science effort can be open to the public, while for more complex tasks such as identifying bird species with subtle appearance differences, communities of experts are needed to provide accurate labels.
“For simple tasks like animal detection, community science effort can be open to the public, while for more complex ones such as identifying bird species with subtle appearance differences (“fine-grained classification”, also see the glossary), communities of experts are needed to provide accurate labels.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationOut of more than 120,000 species monitored by the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, up to 17,000 have a Data deficient status.
“out of more than 120,000 species monitored by the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, up to 17,000 have a ‘Data deficient’ status2.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [2] Committee, T. I. R. L. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species - Strategic Plan 2017-2020. Tech. Rep., IUCN (2017).
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningVolunteer-annotated data services may be limited depending on the task and often require substantial verification effort.
“services may be limited depending on the task and that oftentimes substantial efforts are required to verify volunteer-annotated data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningWith the ability to identify individual animals in images, Wildbook can enable an accurate population census and track population trends over time.
“With the ability to identify individual animals in those images, Wildbook can enable an accurate population census and track population trends over time.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone givenUsing volunteer-acquired images sacrifices control over image acquisitions and is prone to significant noise, for example through low-quality imagery.
“Although this approach sacrifices control over image acquisitions and is likewise prone to inducing significant noise to datasets, for example through low-quality imagery”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenThere are currently Wildbooks for over 50 species, from sea dragons to zebras, spanning the entire planet.
“There are currently Wildbooks for over 50 species, from sea dragons to zebras, spanning the entire planet.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenMore than 80 scientific publications have been enabled by Wildbook.
“More than 80 scientific publications have been enabled by Wildbook.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenWildbook supported the change in conservation status for whale sharks from vulnerable to endangered.
“supported the change in conservation status for whale sharks from “vulnerable” to “endangered”.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationWildbook image analysis can start with images from any source and use ML and computer vision to detect multiple animals, classify their species, and identify individual animals.
“The image analysis of Wildbook can start with images from any source—scientists, camera traps, drones, community scientists, or social media—and use ML and computer vision to detect multiple animals in the images100 to not only classify their species, but identify individual animals applying a suite of different algorithms101,147.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [100] Parham, J. et al. An animal detection pipeline for identification. in IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), 1075–1083 (IEEE, 2018). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [101] Weideman, H. et al. Extracting identifying contours for African elephants and humpback whales using a learned appearance model. in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV) (2020). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [147] Arzoumanian, Z., Holmberg, J. & Norman, B. An astronomical pattern-matching algorithm for computer-aided identification of whale sharks Rhincodon typus. J. Appl. Ecol. 42, 999–1011 (2005). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningTo unlock that potential, sensor data must be interpreted and converted to usable information for ecological research.
“But to do so, it must be interpreted and converted to usable information for ecological research.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe measures yielded by this conversion are sometimes referred to as animal biometrics.
“The measures yielded by this conversion, reviewed in this section, are also sometimes referred to as animal biometrics93.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [93] Kühl, H. S. & Burghardt, T. Animal biometrics: quantifying and detecting phenotypic appearance. Trends Ecol. Evolution 28, 432–441 (2013). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningComputational restrictions in these models limit the number of training examples, likely reducing generalization to new sensor deployments or regions.
“Second, computational restrictions in these models limit the number of training examples, which is likely to have detrimental effects on variations in data (temporal, seasonal, etc.), thus reducing the generalization capabilities to new sensor deployments or regions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningWPS used the MegaDetector to analyze over 900K images last year, which comes out to 2.5K images per day.
“WPS used the MegaDetector to analyze over 900K images last year alone, which comes out to 2.5K images per day.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenConservation efforts of endangered species require knowledge on how many individuals of the species in question are present in a study area.
“Conservation efforts of endangered species require knowledge on how many individuals of the species in question are present in a study area.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenWPS have over 400 connected cameras deployed in 18 different countries, and that number is growing rapidly.
“They have over 400 connected cameras deployed in 18 different countries, and that number is growing rapidly.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningImaging sensors paired with ML models that detect and count individuals in imagery can provide the most significant input to these observations.
“It is these observations where imaging sensors (camera traps, UAVs, etc.), paired with ML models that detect and count individuals in the imagery, can provide the most significant input.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationMegaDetector is a generic, global-scale human, animal, and vehicle detection model that works off-the-shelf for most camera trap data.
“This generic, global-scale human, animal, and vehicle detection model works off-the-shelf for most camera trap data”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [36] Beery, S., Morris, D. & Yang, S. Efficient pipeline for camera trap image review. in Proceedings of the Workshop Data Mining and AI for Conservation, Conference for Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (2019).
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenTasks involved in different approaches show similarities with traditional tasks in ML and computer vision, such as detection, localization, identification, and pose estimation.
“Interestingly, the tasks involved in the different approaches show similarities with traditional tasks in ML and computer vision (e.g., detection, localization, identification, pose estimation), for which we provide a matching example in animal ecology in Fig. 5.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenSuch estimations are conventionally realized with statistical occurrence models informed by sample-based species observations.
“Such estimations are conventionally realized with statistical occurrence models that are informed by sample-based species observations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisereasoningUsing MegaDetector allowed IDFG to label all data before the start of the next monitoring season, whereas manual labeling previously resulted in a lag of approximately 5 years from image collection to completion of labeling.
“allowed IDFG to label all data before the start of the next monitoring season, whereas manual labeling previously resulted in a lag of ~5 years from image collection to completion of labeling.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisereasoningIDFG relies heavily on camera traps to estimate and monitor the wolf population, and needs to process data each year before the next season to make informed policy changes or conservation interventions.
“IDFG relies heavily on camera traps to estimate and monitor this wolf population, and needs to process the data collected each year before the start of the next season in order to make informed policy changes or conservation interventions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe standard for identification of animal species and identity is DNA profiling, which can be difficult to scale to large, distributed populations.
“The standard for identification of animal species and identity is DNA profiling97, which can be difficult to scale to large, distributed populations54,93.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [97] Avise, J. C. Molecular Markers, Natural History and Evolution (Springer Science & Business Media, 2012).
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [54] Schneider, S., Taylor, G. W., Linquist, S. & Kremer, S. C. Past, present and future approaches using computer vision for animal re-identification from camera trap data. Methods Ecol. Evolution 10, 461–470 (2019). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [93] Kühl, H. S. & Burghardt, T. Animal biometrics: quantifying and detecting phenotypic appearance. Trends Ecol. Evolution 28, 432–441 (2013). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenConversion of sensor data can take the form of abundance mapping, individual animal re-identification, herd tracking, or digital reconstruction of the environment.
“For example, such conversion can take the form of abundance mapping, individual animal re-identification, herd tracking, or digital reconstruction (three-dimensional, phenotypical) of the environment the animals live in.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenThe publicly-hosted MegaDetector API has been integrated into wildlife monitoring workflows of over 30 organizations worldwide.
“the publicly-hosted MegaDetector API has been integrated into the wildlife monitoring workflows of over 30 organizations worldwide, including the Wildlife Conservation Society, San Diego Zoo Global, and Island Conservation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn that study, humans achieved identification accuracy between 20% (novices) and 42% (experts) with annotation time between 1 and 2 hours, while the DL model achieved 84% in seconds.
“where humans achieved identification accuracy between 20% (novices) and 42% (experts) with an annotation time between 1 and 2 h, the DL model achieved an identification accuracy of 84% in a matter of seconds.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [38] Schofield, D. et al. Chimpanzee face recognition from videos in the wild using deep learning. Sci. Adv. 5, eaaw0736 (2019). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA study of 23 chimpanzees in Guinea applied facial recognition to a multi-year dataset of 1 million images and achieved greater than 90% accuracy.
“a study of a small group of 23 chimpanzees in Guinea applied facial recognition techniques to a multi-year dataset comprising 1 million images and achieved >90% accuracy38.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [38] Schofield, D. et al. Chimpanzee face recognition from videos in the wild using deep learning. Sci. Adv. 5, eaaw0736 (2019). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenThe 3D shape of an individual can be related to its health, age, or reproductive status.
“The 3D shape of an individual can be related to its health, age, or reproductive status”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAs an alternative to gene-based identification, manual tagging can be used to keep track of individual animals.
“As an alternative to gene-based identification, manual tagging can be used to keep track of individual animals10,93.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [10] Kays, R., Crofoot, M. C., Jetz, W. & Wikelski, M. Terrestrial animal tracking as an eye on life and planet. Science 348, aaa2478 (2015). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [93] Kühl, H. S. & Burghardt, T. Animal biometrics: quantifying and detecting phenotypic appearance. Trends Ecol. Evolution 28, 432–441 (2013). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationParticular challenges for animal re-identification in wild populations include difficulty of manual curation, larger populations, changes in appearance, few sightings per individual, and frequent addition of new individuals, creating an open-set problem.
“The particular challenges for animal (re-)identification in wild populations are related to the difficulty of manual curation, larger populations, changes in appearance (e.g., due to scars, growth), few sightings per individual, and the frequent addition of new individuals that may enter the system due to birth or immigration, therefore creating an “open-set” problem104 wherein the model must deal”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [104] Bendale, A. & Boult, T. E. Towards open set deep networks. in 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 1563–1572 (2016). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationRecent work defines the SMAL model, a 3D articulated shape model for a set of quadruped families.
“Recent work defines the SMAL (Skinned Multi-Animal Linear) model, a 3D articulated shape model for a set of quadruped families107.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [107] Zuffi, S., Kanazawa, A., Jacobs, D. W. & Black, M. J. 3D menagerie: modeling the 3D shape and pose of animals. in 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 6365–6373 (2017). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation3D shape models have recently been defined also for birds.
“3D shape models have been recently defined also for birds111.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [111] Wang, Y., Kolotouros, N., Daniilidis, K. & Badger, M. Birds of a feather: capturing avian shape models from images. in 2021 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 14739–14749 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation3D reconstructions of kill sites for lions in South Africa revealed novel insights into predator-prey relationships and their connection to ecosystem stability and functioning.
“3D reconstructions of kill sites for lions in South Africa revealed novel insights into the predator-prey relationships and their connection to ecosystem stability and functioning114”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [114] Davies, A. B., Tambling, C. J., Kerley, G. I. H. & Asner, G. P. Effects of vegetation structure on the location of lion kill sites in African thicket. PLoS ONE 11, e0149098 (2016). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn ref. 110, the SMAL model was used in a DL approach to predict 3D shape and pose of the Grevy's zebra from images.
“In ref. 110, the SMAL model has been used in a DL approach to predict 3D shape and pose of the Grevy’s zebra from images.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [110] Zuffi, S., Kanazawa, A., Berger-Wolf, T. & Black, M. J. Three-D safari: learning to estimate zebra pose, shape, and texture from images" in the wild". in 2019 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 5359–5368 (2019). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSpatial reconstructions of the environment can be extracted using dedicated sensors such as LiDAR or reconstructed from multiple images via mosaicking or structure from motion/SLAM.
“Such spatial reconstructions of the environment can either be extracted by using dedicated sensors such as LiDAR116 or can be reconstructed from multiple images, either by stitching the images into a unified two-dimensional panorama (e.g., mosaicking117) or by computing the three-dimensional environment from partially overlapping images (e.g., structure from motion118 or simultaneous localization”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [116] Risse, B., Mangan, M., Stürzl, W. & Webb, B. Software to convert terrestrial LiDAR scans of natural environments into photorealistic meshes. Environ. Model. Softw. 99, 88–100 (2018). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [117] Haalck, L. & Risse, B. Embedded dense camera trajectories in multi-video image mosaics by geodesic interpolation-based reintegration. in 2021 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), 1849–1858 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [118] Schonberger, J. L. & Frahm, J.-M. Structure-from-motion revisited. in 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 4104–4113 (2016). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenThe 3D pose of the body can provide finer information on posture attributes and allows kinematic and behavioral analyses.
“the 3D pose of the body can provide finer information with respect to posture attributes and allows, for instance, kinematic as well as behavioral analyses.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationSatellite remote sensing has become an integral part to study animal habitats, biological diversity, and spatiotemporal changes of abiotic conditions, since it allows mapping land cover, soil moisture, or temperature at scale.
“Satellite remote sensing has become an integral part to study animal habitats, biological diversity, and spatiotemporal changes of abiotic conditions113, since it allows to map quantities like land cover, soil moisture, or temperature at scale.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [113] Pettorelli, N. et al. Satellite remote sensing for applied ecologists: opportunities and challenges. J. Appl. Ecol. 51, 839–848 (2014). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenImage-based 3D pose and shape estimation methods provide rich information about individuals but require accurate shape models and prior knowledge about the animal's 3D motion.
“Image-based 3D pose and shape estimation methods provide rich information about individuals but require, in addition to accurate shape models, prior knowledge about the animal’s 3D motion.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBiggs et al. built on SMAL for 3D shape and motion of dogs from video and for recovery of dog shape and pose across many breeds.
“Biggs et al. built on this work for 3D shape and motion of dogs from video108 and for recovery of dog shape and pose across many different breeds109.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [108] Biggs, B., Roddick, T., Fitzgibbon, A. & Cipolla, R. Creatures great and smal: recovering the shape and motion of animals from video. in 2018 Asian Conference on Computer Vision (ACCV), 3–19 (Springer, 2018). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [109] Biggs, B., Boyne, O., Charles, J., Fitzgibbon, A. & Cipolla, R. Who left the dogs out? 3D animal reconstruction with expectation maximization in the loop. in 2020 European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), 195–211 (Springer, 2020). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenWildlife behavior and conservation cannot be dissociated from the environment animals evolve and live in.
“Wildlife behavior and conservation cannot be dissociated from the environment animals evolve and live in.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationVarious user-friendly toolboxes are available to extract the 2D posture of animals from videos, while the user can define which body parts should be estimated.
“Various user-friendly toolboxes are available to extract the 2D posture of animals from videos (Fig. 1d, e), while the user can define which body parts should be estimated (reviewed in ref. 76).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [76] Mathis, A., Schneider, S., Lauer, J. & Mathis, M. W. A primer on motion capture with deep learning: principles, pitfalls, and perspectives. Neuron 108, 44–65 (2020). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMarker-less DL methods for pose estimation have tremendously improved over the last years and already impacted biology.
“For pose estimation, marker-less methods based on DL have tremendously improved over the last years and already impacted biology105.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [105] Mathis, M. W. & Mathis, A. Deep learning tools for the measurement of animal behavior in neuroscience. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 60, 1–11 (2020). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationGraph regression techniques were deployed to reconstruct species interaction networks in a community of European birds with promising results, including better causality estimates of the relations in the graph.
“More recently, graph regression techniques were deployed to reconstruct species interaction networks in a community of European birds with promising results, including better causality estimates of the relations in the graph131.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [131] Faisal, A., Dondelinger, F., Husmeier, D. & Beale, C. M. Inferring species interaction networks from species abundance data: a comparative evaluation of various statistical and machine learning methods. Ecol. Inform. 5, 451–464 (2010). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationNon-parametric ML techniques like Random Forest have been successfully used to predict species richness and have shown significant error reduction with respect to traditional counterparts used in ecology, for example in fishes, spiders, and small mammals.
“Non-parametric ML techniques like Random Forest126 have been successfully used to predict species richness and have shown significant error reduction with respect to the traditional counterparts used in ecology, for example in the estimation of richness distributions of fishes127,128, spiders 129, and small mammals130.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [126] Breiman, L. Random forests. Mach. Learn. 45, 5–32 (2001). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [127] Parravicini, V. et al. Global patterns and predictors of tropical reef fish species richness. Ecography 36, 1254–1262 (2013). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [128] Smoliński, S. & Radtke, K. Spatial prediction of demersal fish diversity in the baltic sea: comparison of machine learning and regression-based techniques. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 74, 102–111 (2017). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSpatially explicit linear regression models have been conventionally used to predict species and community distribution based on explanatory variables such as climate and topography.
“Spatially explicit linear regression models have been conventionally used to predict species and community distribution based on explanatory variables such as climate and topography124,125.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [124] Guisan, A. & Zimmermann, N. E. Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecol. Model. 135, 147–186 (2000). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [125] Lehmann, A., Overton, J. M. & Austin, M. P. Regression models for spatial prediction: their role for biodiversity and conservation. Biodivers. Conserv. 11, 2085–2092 (2002). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenAnalyses of biodiversity, represented by species abundance and richness, are foundational to much ecological research and many conservation initiatives.
“Analyses of biodiversity, represented by such measures as species abundance and richness, are foundational to much ecological research and many conservation initiatives.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisereasoningTree-based methods are well-suited to these tasks because they perform explicit feature ranking and are able to model nonlinear relationships between covariates and species distribution.
“Tree-based methods are well-suited to these tasks because they perform explicit feature ranking (and thus feature selection) and are able to model nonlinear relationships between covariates and species distribution.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenSecurity of rangers themselves is at stake; for example, the flight path of drones might be backtracked to reveal their location.
“Security of rangers themselves is also at stake; for example, the flight path of drones might be backtracked to reveal their location.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningPopulation counts without uncertainty estimation can lead to erroneous and potentially devastating conclusions.
“population counts without uncertainty estimation can lead to erroneous and potentially devastating conclusions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationBiases are not limited to geographical provenance: the type of sensors used, the species they depict, and the imbalance in the number of individuals observed per species must also be considered when training or using models to avoid potentially catastrophic drop-offs in accuracy.
“Biases are not limited to the geographical provenance of images: the type of sensors used (RGB vs. infrared or thermal), the species they depict, and the imbalance in the number of individuals observed per species55,132 must also be considered when training or using models to avoid potentially catastrophic drop-offs in accuracy”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [55] Beery, S., Van Horn, G. & Perona, P. Recognition in terra incognita. in 2018 European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), 456–473 (2018). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [132] Van Horn, G. et al. The inaturalist species classification and detection dataset. in 2018 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 8769–8778 (2018). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningThe universality of ML is now strongly questioned and the inductive bias of traditional DL models is challenged by new approaches that bridge domain knowledge, fundamental laws, and data science.
“Such universality of ML is now strongly questioned and the inductive bias of traditional DL models is challenged by new approaches that bridge domain knowledge, fundamental laws, and data science.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenMachine and deep learning are becoming necessary accelerators for wildlife research and conservation actions in natural reserves.
“Machine and deep learning are becoming necessary accelerators for wildlife research and conservation actions in natural reserves.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningWithout quality control measures, relying on model-based results is risky and could have difficult-to-evaluate impacts on research in animal ecology, as incorrect results hidden in a suboptimally trained model will become more difficult to detect.
“Without such quality control measures, relying on model-based results is risky and could have difficult-to-evaluate impacts on research in animal ecology, as incorrect results hidden in a suboptimally trained model will become more and more difficult to detect.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenErrors by models can lead to erroneous decisions on site that can be catastrophic for the population they are trying to preserve or for populations at the border of human/wildlife conflicts.
“Computer scientists must be aware that errors by their models can lead to erroneous decisions on site that can be catastrophic for the population they are trying to preserve or for the populations that live at the border of human/wildlife conflicts.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenCloud computing services exist that forgo the need of hardware management, but they pose per-resource costs that quickly scale to several thousands of dollars per month for a single virtual machine.
“Although cloud computing services exist that forgo the need of hardware management, they likewise pose per-resource costs that quickly scale to several thousands of dollars per month for a single virtual machine.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenModels currently used in animal ecology are far from such a carbon footprint.
“Even though the models currently used in animal ecology are far from such a carbon footprint”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationRecently, it has been estimated that large, state-of-the-art models for understanding natural language emit as much carbon as several cars in their entire lifetime.
“recently, it has been estimated that large, state-of-the-art models for understanding natural language emit as much carbon as several cars in their entire lifetime135.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [135] Strubell, E., Ganesh, A. & McCallum, A. Energy and policy considerations for deep learning in NLP. in Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 3645–3650 (2019). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationOpening up existing datasets, especially private-owned images acquired by non-professionals, is both a necessary and difficult challenge for the near future.
“However, opening up existing datasets (and especially when using private-owned images acquired by non-professionals as in ref. 92) is both a necessary and difficult challenge for the near future.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [92] Parham, J., Crall, J., Stewart, C., Berger-Wolf, T. & Rubenstein, D. I. Animal population censusing at scale with citizen science and photographic identification. in AAAI Spring Symposium-Technical Report (2017).
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn some cases, it is imperative that the privacy of the data be preserved, for instance to avoid giving poachers access to locations of animals in near-real-time.
“In some cases, it is imperative that the privacy of the data be preserved, for instance to avoid giving poachers access to locations of animals in near-real-time134.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [134] Lennox, R. J. et al. A novel framework to protect animal data in a world of ecosurveillance. BioScience 70, 468–476 (2020). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningPurchasing prices of such machines alone are often prohibitively high especially for budget-constrained conservation organizations; programming, running, and maintenance costs further add to the bill.
“Purchasing prices of such machines alone are often prohibitively high especially for budget-constrained conservation organizations; programming, running, and maintenance costs further add to the bill.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningSmaller models are not only less expensive to train and use, their lighter computational costs allow them to be run on smaller devices, opening opportunities for real-time ML on the edge.
“Smaller models are not only less expensive to train and use, their lighter computational costs allow them to be run on smaller devices, opening opportunities for real-time ML “on the edge”—i.e., within the sensors themselves.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningFostering a culture of individual and cross-institutional data sharing in ecology will allow ML approaches to improve in robustness and accuracy.
“Fostering a culture of individual and cross-institutional data sharing in ecology will allow ML approaches to improve in robustness and accuracy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenEstimations of models remain approximations and need to be treated as such.
“The estimations of models remain approximations and need to be treated as such”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
PremisecitationTransparency around the training data and the intended model usage is a necessity.
“transparency around the training data and the intended model usage is a necessity133.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [133] Copas, K. et al. Training machines to improve species identification using GBIF-mediated datasets. in AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts, Vol. 2019, IN53C–0758 (2019).
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenState-of-the-art ML models are now being applied to many tasks in animal ecology and wildlife conservation.
“State-of-the-art ML models are now being applied to many tasks in animal ecology and wildlife conservation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenEnvironmental costs of AI are often disregarded, as energy consumption of large calculations is still considered an endless resource, assuming that the money to pay for it is available.
“environmental costs of AI are often disregarded, as energy consumption of large calculations is still considered an endless resource (assuming that the money to pay for it is available).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenTraining and running models with millions of parameters on large volumes of data requires powerful, somewhat specialized hardware.
“Training and running models with millions of parameters on large volumes of data requires powerful, somewhat specialized hardware.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenThe ML and DL fields have focused mainly on black box models that learn correlations from data directly, and domain knowledge has been repeatedly ignored in favor of generic approaches.
“The ML and DL fields have focused mainly on black box models that learn correlations from data directly, and domain knowledge has been repeatedly ignored in favor of generic approaches that could fit to any kind of dataset.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationMany open imagery repositories such as Artportalen.se, Naturgucker.de, and Waarneming.nl collect images from specific regions, and most contributions on iNaturalist come from the Northern hemisphere.
“For example, many open imagery repositories such as Artportalen.se, Naturgucker.de, and Waarneming.nl collect images from specific regions, and most contributions on iNaturalist132 (see Table 2) come from the Northern hemisphere.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [132] Van Horn, G. et al. The inaturalist species classification and detection dataset. in 2018 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 8769–8778 (2018). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningLaboratories rightly serve as the ultimate development space for such in-the-wild applications.
“Thus, laboratories rightly serve as the ultimate development space for such in-the-wild applications.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenThis line of interdisciplinary research is small but growing, with several studies published in recent years.
“This line of interdisciplinary research is small but growing, with several studies published in recent years.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationRef. 139 incorporates knowledge about the distribution of species and photographer biases into a DL model for species classification in images and reports accuracy improvements of up to 12% in iNaturalist over a baseline without such priors.
“Similarly ref. 139, incorporate knowledge about the distribution of species as well as photographer biases into a DL model for species classification in images and report accuracy improvements of up to 12% in iNaturalist over a baseline without such priors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [139] Mac Aodha, O., Cole, E. & Perona, P. Presence-only geographical priors for fine-grained image classification. in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 9596–9606 (2019). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe hybrid models paradigm is one of the most exciting avenues in modern ML and promises real collaboration between domains of application and ML, especially when coupled with algorithmic designs that allow interpretation and understanding of visual cues.
“This “hybrid models” paradigm48,50 is one of the most exciting avenues in modern ML and promises real collaboration between domains of application and ML, especially when coupled with algorithmic designs that allow interpretation and understanding of the visual cues that are being used136.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [48] Reichstein, M. et al. Deep learning and process understanding for data-driven Earth system science. Nature 566, 195–204 (2019). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [50] Karpatne, A. et al. Theory-guided data science: A new paradigm for scientific discovery from data. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 29, 2318–2331 (2017). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [136] Samek, W., Montavon, G., Vedaldi, A., Hansen, L. K. & Müller, K.-R. Explainable AI: Interpreting, Explaining and Visualizing Deep Learning, Vol. 11700 (Springer Nature, 2019). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe high level of control afforded by laboratory settings facilitated the rapid development of such tools, many of which are now being adopted for use in field studies of free-moving animals in complex natural environments.
“The high level of control (e.g., of lighting conditions, sensor calibration, and environment) afforded by laboratory settings facilitated the rapid development of such tools, many of which are now being adopted for use in field studies of free-moving animals in complex natural environments75,142.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [75] Graving, J. M. et al. DeepPoseKit, a software toolkit for fast and robust animal pose estimation using deep learning. Elife 8, e47994 (2019). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [142] Joska, D. et al. AcinoSet: a 3D pose estimation dataset and baseline models for Cheetahs in the wild. 2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.13282 (IEEE, Xi’an, China, 2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationRef. 140 used expert knowledge of park rangers to augment sparse and noisy records of poaching activity, improving predictions of poaching occurrence and enabling more efficient use of limited patrol resources in a Chinese nature reserve.
“Finally ref. 140, used expert knowledge of park rangers to augment sparse and noisy records of poaching activity, thereby improving predictions of poaching occurrence and enabling more efficient use of limited patrol resources in a Chinese nature reserve.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [140] Gurumurthy, S. et al. Exploiting Data and Human Knowledge for Predicting Wildlife Poaching. in Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCAS Conference on Computing and Sustainable Societies, 1–8, https://doi.org/10.1145/3209811.3209879 (ACM, 2018). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenStatistical models for species richness and diversity are routinely used to estimate abundances and study species co-occurrence and interactions.
“Statistical models for species richness and diversity are routinely used to estimate abundances and study species co-occurrence and interactions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAlgorithmic insights gained in the lab can be transferred back into the wild-studies on short videos or camera traps can leverage lab-generated data that is arguably less diverse, but easier to control.
“In addition, algorithmic insights gained in the lab can be transferred back into the wild—studies on short videos or camera traps can leverage lab-generated data that is arguably less diverse, but easier to control.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationThis opens interesting research opportunities for the adaptation of lab-generated simulation to real-world conditions, similar to what has been observed in image synthesis for self driving and robotics.
“This opens interesting research opportunities for the adaptation of lab-generated simulation to real-world conditions, similar to what has been observed in the field of image synthesis for self driving143 and robotics144 in the last decade.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [143] Chen, Q. & Koltun, V. Photographic image synthesis with cascaded refinement networks. in 2019 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 1511–1520 (2017). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [144] Lee, J., Hwangbo, J., Wellhausen, L., Koltun, V. & Hutter, M. Learning quadrupedal locomotion over challenging terrain. Sci. Robot. 5, eabc5986 (2020). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThese approaches challenge the dogma of ML models learning exclusively from data and achieve more efficient model learning and enhanced plausibility of solutions.
“These approaches challenge the dogma of ML models learning exclusively from data and achieve more efficient model learning (since base knowledge is available from the start and does not have to be re-learnt) and enhanced plausibility of the solutions (because the solution space can be constrained to a range of ecologically plausible outcomes).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenComputer scientists have yet to integrate ecological knowledge such as underlying biological processes into machine learning models.
“Computer scientists have yet to integrate ecological knowledge such as underlying biological processes into ML models, and the lack of transparency of current DL models has so far been a major obstacle to incorporating ML into ecological research.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationOpen challenges in species distribution modeling include increasing the scale of joint models geospatially, temporally, and taxonomically; building methods that can leverage multiple data types despite bias from non-uniform sampling strategies; incorporating ecological knowledge such as species dispersal and community composition; and expanding methods for evaluation.
“Open challenges include increasing the scale of joint models geospatially, temporally, and taxonomically, building methods that can leverage multiple data types despite bias from non-uniform sampling strategies, incorporating ecological knowledge such as species dispersal and community composition, and expanding methods for the evaluation of these models.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [146] Beery, S., Cole, E., Parker, J., Perona, P. & Winner, K. Species distribution modeling for machine learning practitioners: a review. in Proceedings of the 4th ACM SIGCAS Conference on Computing and Sustainable Societies (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningThe vision described in the paper cannot be achieved without interdisciplinary thinking.
“Finally, we wish to re-emphasize that the vision described here cannot be achieved without interdisciplinary thinking: for all these exciting opportunities, processing big ecological data is necessitating analytical techniques of such complexity that no single ecologist can be expected to have all the technical expertise (plus domain knowledge) required to carry out groundbreaking studies65.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenThe GeoLifeCLEF task is complex because only positive counts are provided, no absence data are available, and predictions are counted as correct if the ground truth species is among the 30 predicted with highest confidence.
“The task is complex: only positive counts are provided, no absence data are available, and predictions are counted as correct if the ground truth species is among the 30 predicted with highest confidence.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningImprovements from machine learning and new generation sensors require ever-closer cooperation between ecologists and machine learning specialists, since recent approaches are more complex than ever and require strict quality control and detailed design knowledge.
“Although often spectacular, such improvements require ever-closer cooperation between ecologists and ML specialists, since recent approaches are more complex than ever and require strict quality control and detailed design knowledge.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe lack of transparency of current deep learning models has so far been a major obstacle to incorporating machine learning into ecological research.
“Computer scientists have yet to integrate ecological knowledge such as underlying biological processes into ML models, and the lack of transparency of current DL models has so far been a major obstacle to incorporating ML into ecological research.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Community science efforts increase public engagement in science and conservation.
“Community science efforts also increase public engagement in science and conservation.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Machine and deep learning are necessary accelerators for wildlife research and conservation actions in natural reserves.
“Machine and deep learning are becoming necessary accelerators for wildlife research and conservation actions in natural reserves.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Environmental costs of AI are often disregarded because energy consumption of large calculations is still considered an endless resource.
“environmental costs of AI are often disregarded, as energy consumption of large calculations is still considered an endless resource (assuming that the money to pay for it is available).”
The paper relies on this without support.
GeoLifeCLEF curated a dataset of 1.9 million iNaturalist observations from North America and France depicting over 31,000 species, together with environmental predictors, and asked users to predict a ranked list of likely species per geospatial grid cell.
“GeoLifeCLEF curated a dataset of 1.9 million iNaturalist observations from North America and France depicting over 31,000 species, together with environmental predictors (land cover, altitude, climatic data, etc.), and asked users to predict a ranked list of likely species per geospatial grid cell.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The winners of the 2021 GeoLifeCLEF edition achieved only an approximate 26% top-30 accuracy.
“This challenging task remains an open challenge—the winners of the 2021 edition achieved only an approximate 26% top-30 accuracy.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Animal ecology and wildlife conservation need to make sense of large and ever-increasing streams of data to provide accurate estimations of populations, understand animal behavior and fight against poaching and loss of biodiversity.
“Animal ecology and wildlife conservation need to make sense of large and ever-increasing streams of data to provide accurate estimations of populations, understand animal behavior and fight against poaching and loss of biodiversity.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The algorithm-hardware codesign solution for 2D TinyML workloads decreases the need for data transfer between the image sensor and the accelerator for CNN processing, resulting in lower energy and bandwidth requirements.
“This decreases the need for data transfer between the image sensor and the accelerator for Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) processing, resulting in lower energy and bandwidth requirements.”
From A Comprehensive Survey on TinyML (2023) · cites this paper as [87]
The 'What can we focus on now?' section discusses smaller models running within sensors, but does not describe algorithm–hardware codesign or reduced data transfer between an image sensor and a CNN accelerator. Searches for those terms and for TinyML found no passage addressing the claimed energy and bandwidth reductions. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.75)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe two CNN models implemented using PIP yield considerable compression while reducing data rates and power consumption.
“The authors in [87] also offer two CNN models that are implemented using PIP (pixel-in-pixel), which yields considerable compression while reducing data rates and power consumption.”
From A Comprehensive Survey on TinyML (2023) · cites this paper as [87]
The Remote sensing section discusses on-board processing to conserve power and reduce transmitted data, and What can we focus on now? discusses the lower computational costs of smaller models. Neither passage addresses two CNN models implemented using pixel-in-pixel (PIP) or reports their compression, data-rate, and power-consumption results. Searches for PIP and those results found no decisive passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.77)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Bat-counting claim conflicts with cited study title
MinorThe text says human counts tend to underestimate bats emerging from caves, but the cited study's title says thermal imaging found colonies significantly smaller than previously estimated, implying the earlier estimates were too high.
“humans conducting counts of seabird colonies12 and bats emerging from cave roosts13 tend to significantly underestimate the number of individuals present.”
“Thermal imaging reveals significantly smaller Brazilian free-tailed bat colonies than previously estimated”
Cites
Breiman, L. (2001) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1010933404324 · Cited by 133,538 · see citing works
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126 · see citing works
Cortes, C., & Vapnik, V. (1995) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00994018 · Cited by 59,421 · see citing works
The Elements of Statistical Learning
Hastie, T., Friedman, J., & Tibshirani, R. (2001) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-21606-5 · Cited by 24,162 · see citing works
An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale
Dosovitskiy, A., Beyer, L., Kolesnikov, A., Weissenborn, D., Zhai, X., Unterthiner, T., Dehghani, M., Minderer, M., Heigold, G., Gelly, S., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.11929 · Cited by 21,793 · see citing works
Ror2 signaling regulates Golgi structure and transport through IFT20 for tumor invasiveness
Nishita, M., Park, S.-Y., Nishio, T., Kamizaki, K., Wang, Z., Tamada, K., Takumi, T., Hashimoto, R., Otani, H., Pazour, G. J., et al. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-016-0028-x · Cited by 15,947 · see citing works
Observational study of behavior: sampling methods
Altmann, J. (1974) · Behaviour · doi:10.1163/156853974x00534 · Cited by 13,891 · see citing works
The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction
Lu, Z. Q. J. (2010) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society) · doi:10.1111/j.1467-985x.2010.00646_6.x · Cited by 12,904 · see citing works
Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology
Guisan, A., & Zimmermann, N. E. (2000) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/s0304-3800(00)00354-9 · Cited by 7,359 · see citing works
ORB-SLAM2: An Open-Source SLAM System for Monocular, Stereo, and RGB-D Cameras
Mur-Artal, R., & Tardos, J. D. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Robotics · doi:10.1109/tro.2017.2705103 · Cited by 6,898 · see citing works
Structure-from-Motion Revisited
Schonberger, J. L., & Frahm, J.-M. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.445 · Cited by 6,433 · see citing works
Deep learning and process understanding for data-driven Earth system science
Reichstein, M., Camps-Valls, G., Stevens, B., Jung, M., Denzler, J., Carvalhais, N., & Prabhat (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-0912-1 · Cited by 5,673 · see citing works
DeepLabCut: markerless pose estimation of user-defined body parts with deep learning
Mathis, A., Mamidanna, P., Cury, K. M., Abe, T., Murthy, V. N., Mathis, M. W., & Bethge, M. (2018) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-018-0209-y · Cited by 5,187 · see citing works
Self-citationEnergy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLP
Strubell, E., Ganesh, A., & McCallum, A. (2019) · Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1355 · Cited by 3,684 · see citing works
Deep Learning in Remote Sensing: A Comprehensive Review and List of Resources
Zhu, X. X., Tuia, D., Mou, L., Xia, G.-S., Zhang, L., Xu, F., & Fraundorfer, F. (2017) · IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine · doi:10.1109/mgrs.2017.2762307 · Cited by 3,400 · see citing works
Self-citationTowards Open Set Deep Networks
Bendale, A., & Boult, T. E. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.173 · Cited by 1,799 · see citing works
Theory-Guided Data Science: A New Paradigm for Scientific Discovery from Data
Karpatne, A., Atluri, G., Faghmous, J. H., Steinbach, M., Banerjee, A., Ganguly, A., Shekhar, S., Samatova, N., & Kumar, V. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2017.2720168 · Cited by 1,752 · see citing works
Terrestrial animal tracking as an eye on life and planet
Kays, R., Crofoot, M. C., Jetz, W., & Wikelski, M. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaa2478 · Cited by 1,638 · see citing works
Self-citationThe iNaturalist Species Classification and Detection Dataset
Van Horn, G., Mac Aodha, O., Song, Y., Cui, Y., Sun, C., Shepard, A., Adam, H., Perona, P., & Belongie, S. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00914 · Cited by 1,451 · see citing works
Explainable AI: Interpreting, Explaining and Visualizing Deep Learning
(2019) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-28954-6 · Cited by 1,377 · see citing works
Norouzzadeh, M. S., Nguyen, A., Kosmala, M., Swanson, A., Palmer, M. S., Packer, C., & Clune, J. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1719367115 · Cited by 1,230 · see citing works
McKinley, D. C., Miller-Rushing, A., Ballard, H. L., Bonney, R. E., Brown, H., Cook‐Patton, S. C., Evans, D. M., French, R. A., Parrish, J. K., Phillips, T., et al. (2016) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2016.05.015 · Cited by 1,160 · see citing works
Learning quadrupedal locomotion over challenging terrain
Lee, J., Hwangbo, J., Wellhausen, L., Koltun, V., & Hutter, M. (2020) · Science Robotics · doi:10.1126/scirobotics.abc5986 · Cited by 1,156 · see citing works
A formal definition of Big Data based on its essential features
Mauro, A. D., Greco, M., & Grimaldi, M. (2016) · Library Review · doi:10.1108/lr-06-2015-0061 · Cited by 957 · see citing works
Molecular Markers, Natural History, and Evolution
Sites, J. W., & Avise, J. C. (1994) · Copeia · doi:10.2307/1446738 · Cited by 943 · see citing works
Vertebrates on the brink as indicators of biological annihilation and the sixth mass extinction
Ceballos, G., Ehrlich, P. R., & Raven, P. H. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1922686117 · Cited by 926 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Animal diversity is declining at an unprecedented rate (1).”
BackgroundBirdNET: A deep learning solution for avian diversity monitoring
Kahl, S., Wood, C. M., Eibl, M., & Klinck, H. (2021) · Ecological Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ecoinf.2021.101236 · Cited by 903 · see citing works
Self-citationPhotographic Image Synthesis with Cascaded Refinement Networks
Chen, Q., & Koltun, V. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2017.168 · Cited by 887 · see citing works
Terrestrial Passive Acoustic Monitoring: Review and Perspectives
Sugai, L. S. M., Silva, T. S. F., Ribeiro, J. W., & Llusia, D. (2018) · BioScience · doi:10.1093/biosci/biy147 · Cited by 756 · see citing works
Learning quadrupedal locomotion over challenging terrain
Lee, J., Hwangbo, J., Wellhausen, L., Koltun, V., & Hutter, M. (2020) · Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) · doi:10.3929/ethz-b-000448343 · Cited by 752 · see citing works
Applications for deep learning in ecology
Christin, S., Hervet, É., & Lecomte, N. (2019) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.13256 · Cited by 724 · see citing works
Satellite remote sensing for applied ecologists: opportunities and challenges
Pettorelli, N., Laurance, W. F., O'Brien, T. G., Wegmann, M., Nagendra, H., & Turner, W. (2014) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2664.12261 · Cited by 707 · see citing works
Deep Learning for Classification of Hyperspectral Data: A Comparative Review
Audebert, N., Saux, B. L., & Lefèvre, S. (2019) · IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine · doi:10.1109/mgrs.2019.2912563 · Cited by 700 · see citing works
Recognition in Terra Incognita
Beery, S., Van Horn, G., & Perona, P. (2018) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-01270-0_28 · Cited by 679 · see citing works
Self-citationDeepPoseKit, a software toolkit for fast and robust animal pose estimation using deep learning
Graving, J. M., Chae, D., Naik, H., Li, L., Koger, B., Costelloe, B. R., & Couzin, I. D. (2019) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.47994 · Cited by 547 · see citing works
Self-citationMachine learning for image based species identification
Wäldchen, J., & Mäder, P. (2018) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.13075 · Cited by 515 · see citing works
Swanson, A., Kosmala, M., Lintott, C., Simpson, R., Smith, A., & Packer, C. (2015) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/sdata.2015.26 · Cited by 510 · see citing works
Pandemic Human Viruses Cause Decline of Endangered Great Apes
Köndgen, S., Kühl, H. S., N’Goran, P. K., Walsh, P. D., Schenk, S., Ernst, N., Biek, R., Formenty, P. B. H., Mätz‐Rensing, K., Schweiger, B., et al. (2008) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2008.01.012 · Cited by 508 · see citing works
Applications of machine learning in animal behaviour studies
Valletta, J. J., Torney, C., Kings, M., Thornton, A., & Madden, J. (2017) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.12.005 · Cited by 505 · cited 1× · see citing works
“A growing body of literature promotes the use of ML in various ecological subfields by educating domain experts about ML approaches (35, 49, 50), their utility in capitalizing on big data (32, 51), and, more recently, their potential for ecolog-”
BackgroundSettles, B. (2012) · Synthesis lectures on artificial intelligence and machine learning · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-01560-1 · Cited by 503 · see citing works
Linchant, J., Lisein, J., Ngabinzeke, J. S., Lejeune, P., & Vermeulen, C. (2015) · Mammal Review · doi:10.1111/mam.12046 · Cited by 502 · see citing works
Precision wildlife monitoring using unmanned aerial vehicles
Hodgson, J. C., Baylis, S. M., Mott, R., Herrod, A., & Clarke, R. H. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep22574 · Cited by 476 · see citing works
Drones count wildlife more accurately and precisely than humans
Hodgson, J. C., Mott, R., Baylis, S. M., Pham, T. T., Wotherspoon, S. J., Kilpatrick, A. D., Segaran, R. R., Reid, I. D., Terauds, A., & Koh, L. P. (2018) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.12974 · Cited by 465 · see citing works
Computational Neuroethology: A Call to Action
Datta, S. R., Anderson, D. J., Branson, K., Perona, P., & Leifer, A. (2019) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2019.09.038 · Cited by 453 · see citing works
Deep learning tools for the measurement of animal behavior in neuroscience
Mathis, M. W., & Mathis, A. (2020) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2019.10.008 · Cited by 450 · see citing works
Self-citationScaling‐up camera traps: monitoring the planet's biodiversity with networks of remote sensors
Steenweg, R. W., Hebblewhite, M., Kays, R., Ahumada, J., Fisher, J. T., Burton, A. C., Townsend, S. E., Carbone, C., Rowcliffe, J. M., Whittington, J., et al. (2016) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1002/fee.1448 · Cited by 447 · see citing works
Self-citationA computer vision for animal ecology
Weinstein, B. G. (2017) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2656.12780 · Cited by 435 · see citing works
Stowell, D., Wood, M. D., Pamuła, H., Stylianou, Y., & Glotin, H. (2019) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.13103 · Cited by 414 · see citing works
Hausmann, A., Toivonen, T., Slotow, R., Tenkanen, H., Moilanen, A., Heikinheimo, V., & Minin, E. D. (2017) · Conservation Letters · doi:10.1111/conl.12343 · Cited by 405 · see citing works
3D Menagerie: Modeling the 3D Shape and Pose of Animals
Zuffi, S., Kanazawa, A., Jacobs, D. W., & Black, M. J. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.586 · Cited by 381 · see citing works
Self-citationGoing wild: what a global small-animal tracking system could do for experimental biologists
Wikelski, M., Kays, R., Kasdin, N., Thorup, K., Smith, J. A., & Swenson, G. (2007) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.02629 · Cited by 362 · see citing works
Self-citationKellenberger, B., Marcos, D., & Tuia, D. (2018) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2018.06.028 · Cited by 335 · see citing works
Self-citationOptimizing the use of biologgers for movement ecology research
Williams, H. J., Taylor, L. A., Benhamou, S., Bijleveld, A. I., Clay, T. A., de Grissac, S., Demšar, U., English, H. M., Franconi, N., Gómez‐Laich, A., et al. (2020) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2656.13094 · Cited by 333 · see citing works
Situating Ecology as a Big-Data Science: Current Advances, Challenges, and Solutions
Farley, S. S., Dawson, A., Goring, S. J., & Williams, J. W. (2018) · BioScience · doi:10.1093/biosci/biy068 · Cited by 331 · see citing works
A Comprehensive Overview of Technologies for Species and Habitat Monitoring and Conservation
Lahoz‐Monfort, J. J., & Magrath, M. J. L. (2021) · BioScience · doi:10.1093/biosci/biab073 · Cited by 321 · see citing works
ARZOUMANIAN, Z., HOLMBERG, J., & NORMAN, B. (2005) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01117.x · Cited by 316 · see citing works
Walter, T., & Couzin, I. D. (2021) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.64000 · Cited by 292 · see citing works
Self-citationSchneider, S., Taylor, G. W., Linquist, S., & Kremer, S. C. (2019) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.13133 · Cited by 245 · see citing works
Simpson, R. J., Page, K., & Roure, D. D. (2014) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/2567948.2579215 · Cited by 244 · see citing works
Wildlife population monitoring: some practical considerations
Witmer, G. W. (2005) · Wildlife Research · doi:10.1071/wr04003 · Cited by 237 · see citing works
Automated identification of animal species in camera trap images
Yu, X., Wang, J., Kays, R., Jansen, P. A., Wang, T., & Huang, T. S. (2013) · EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing · doi:10.1186/1687-5281-2013-52 · Cited by 232 · see citing works
Self-citationA Primer on Motion Capture with Deep Learning: Principles, Pitfalls, and Perspectives
Mathis, A., Schneider, S., Lauer, J., & Mathis, M. W. (2020) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2020.09.017 · Cited by 231 · see citing works
Self-citationChallenges and solutions for studying collective animal behaviour in the wild
Hughey, L. F., Hein, A. M., Strandburg‐Peshkin, A., & Jensen, F. H. (2018) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2017.0005 · Cited by 229 · see citing works
Chimpanzee face recognition from videos in the wild using deep learning
Schofield, D., Nagrani, A., Zisserman, A., Hayashi, M., Matsuzawa, T., Biro, D., & Carvalho, S. (2019) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aaw0736 · Cited by 224 · see citing works
Bat detective—Deep learning tools for bat acoustic signal detection
Mac Aodha, O., Gibb, R., Barlow, K. E., Browning, E., Firman, M., Freeman, R., Harder, B., Kinsey, L., Mead, G. R., Newson, S. E., et al. (2018) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005995 · Cited by 216 · see citing works
Ahumada, J., Fegraus, E., Birch, T., Flores, N., Kays, R., O’Brien, T. G., Palmer, J., Schuttler, S., Zhao, J. Y., Jetz, W., et al. (2019) · Environmental Conservation · doi:10.1017/s0376892919000298 · Cited by 215 · see citing works
Self-citationEfficient Pipeline for Camera Trap Image ReviewPreprint
Beery, S., Morris, D., & Yang, S. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1907.06772 · Cited by 204 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Biological Records Centre: a pioneer of citizen science
Pocock, M. J. O., Roy, H. E., Preston, C. D., & Roy, D. B. (2015) · Biological Journal of the Linnean Society · doi:10.1111/bij.12548 · Cited by 203 · see citing works
Ditria, E. M., Lopez‐Marcano, S., Sievers, M., Jinks, E. L., Brown, C. J., & Connolly, R. M. (2020) · Frontiers in Marine Science · doi:10.3389/fmars.2020.00429 · Cited by 200 · see citing works
Acoustic monitoring for conservation in tropical forests: examples from forest elephants
Wrege, P. H., Rowland, E. D., Keen, S., & Shiu, Y. (2017) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.12730 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Animal biometrics: quantifying and detecting phenotypic appearance
Kühl, H. S., & Burghardt, T. (2013) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2013.02.013 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
Self-citationWhale counting in satellite and aerial images with deep learning
Guirado, E., Tabik, S., Rivas, M. L., Alcaraz‐Segura, D., & Herrera, F. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-50795-9 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
Global patterns and predictors of tropical reef fish species richness
Parravicini, V., Kulbicki, M., Bellwood, D. R., Friedlander, A. M., Arias‐Gonzalez, J. E., Chabanet, P., Floeter, S. R., Myers, R., Vigliola, L., D’Agata, S., et al. (2013) · Ecography · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0587.2013.00291.x · Cited by 186 · see citing works
McEvoy, J. F., Hall, G. P., & McDonald, P. G. (2016) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.1831 · Cited by 185 · see citing works
Davis, G. E., Baumgartner, M. F., Bonnell, J. M., Bell, J. T., Berchok, C. L., Thornton, J. B., Brault, S., Buchanan, G. A., Charif, R. A., Cholewiak, D., et al. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-13359-3 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Self-citation(2021) · doi:10.1002/9781119646181 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Self-citationRobust gait-based gender classification using depth cameras
Igual, L., Lapedriza, À., & Borràs, R. (2013) · EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing · doi:10.1186/1687-5281-2013-1 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
Effects of human activity on Adelie penguin Pygoscelis adeliae breeding success
Giese, M. (1996) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/0006-3207(95)00060-7 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Betke, M., Hirsh, D. E., Makris, N. C., McCracken, G. F., Procopio, M., Hristov, N. I., Tang, S., Bagchi, A., Reichard, J. D., Horn, J., et al. (2008) · Journal of Mammalogy · doi:10.1644/07-mamm-a-011.1 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
Uncovering Ecological Patterns with Convolutional Neural Networks
Brodrick, P. G., Davies, A. B., & Asner, G. P. (2019) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2019.03.006 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Ofli, F., Meier, P. P., Imran, M., Castillo, C., Tuia, D., Nicolas, R., Briant, J., Millet, P., Reinhard, F., Parkan, M., et al. (2016) · Big Data · doi:10.1089/big.2014.0064 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Self-citationPeters, D. P. C., Havstad, K. M., Cushing, J., Tweedie, C. E., Fuentes, O., & Villanueva‐Rosales, N. (2014) · Ecosphere · doi:10.1890/es13-00359.1 · Cited by 162 · see citing works
Perspectives – Minimizing Observer Bias in Behavioral Studies: A Review and Recommendations
Burghardt, G. M., Bartmess-LeVasseur, J., Browning, S. A., Morrison, K. E., Stec, C. L., Zachau, C. E., & Freeberg, T. M. (2012) · Ethology · doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.2012.02040.x · Cited by 158 · see citing works
Duporge, I., Isupova, O., Reece, S., Macdonald, D. W., & Wang, T. (2020) · Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation · doi:10.1002/rse2.195 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Machine learning for inferring animal behavior from location and movement data
Wang, G. (2019) · Ecological Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ecoinf.2018.12.002 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Detecting animals in African Savanna with UAVs and the crowds
Rey, N., Volpi, M., Joost, S., & Tuia, D. (2017) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2017.08.026 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Self-citationWorking across space and time: nonstationarity in ecological research and application
Rollinson, C. R., Finley, A. O., Alexander, M. R., Banerjee, S., Hamil, K.-A. D., Koenig, L., Locke, D. H., DeMarche, M. L., Tingley, M. W., Wheeler, K. I., et al. (2021) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1002/fee.2298 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Presence-Only Geographical Priors for Fine-Grained Image Classification
Aodha, O. M., Cole, E., & Perona, P. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2019.00969 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Pichler, M., Boreux, V., Klein, A., Schleuning, M., & Hartig, F. (2020) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.13329 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
A translucent box: interpretable machine learning in ecology
Lucas, T. C. D. (2020) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.1002/ecm.1422 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Gottschalk, T. K., Huettmann, F., & Ehlers, M. (2005) · International Journal of Remote Sensing · doi:10.1080/01431160512331338041 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Pichler, M., Boreux, V., Klein, A., Schleuning, M., Hartig, F., & Carvalheiro, L. (2020) · University of Regensburg Publication Server (University of Regensburg) · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Context R-CNN: Long Term Temporal Context for Per-Camera Object Detection
Beery, S., Wu, G., Rathod, V., Votel, R., & Huang, J. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.01309 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Self-citationThree-D Safari: Learning to Estimate Zebra Pose, Shape, and Texture From Images “In the Wild”
Zuffi, S., Kanazawa, A., Berger-Wolf, T., & Black, M. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2019.00546 · Cited by 139 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In (114) the SMAL model has been used in a DL approach to predict 3D shape and pose of the Grevy’s zebra from images.”
MethodSelf-citationEikelboom, J. A. J., Wind, J., van de Ven, E., Kenana, L. M., Schroder, B., de Knegt, H. J., van Langevelde, F., & Prins, H. H. T. (2019) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.13277 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Knudby, A., LeDrew, E., & Brenning, A. (2010) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2010.01.007 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
ATRW: A Benchmark for Amur Tiger Re-identification in the Wild
Li, S., Li, J., Tang, H., Qian, R., & Lin, W. (2020) · Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Multimedia · doi:10.1145/3394171.3413569 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Job-Related Mortality of Wildlife Workers in the United States, 1937-2000
Sasse, D. (2003) · Cited by 112 · see citing works
AI empowers conservation biology
Kwok, R. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/d41586-019-00746-1 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Regression models for spatial prediction: their role for biodiversity and conservation
Lehmann, A., Overton, J. M., & Austin, M. P. (2002) · Biodiversity & Conservation · doi:10.1023/a:1021354914494 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
From field surveys to LiDAR: Shining a light on how bats respond to forest structure
Froidevaux, J. S. P., Zellweger, F., Bollmann, K., Jones, G., & Obrist, M. K. (2016) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2015.12.038 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Torney, C. J., Lloyd‐Jones, D. J., Chevallier, M., Moyer, D. C., Maliti, H. T., Mwita, M., Kohi, E. M., & Hopcraft, G. C. (2019) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.13165 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Weissensteiner, M. H., Poelstra, J. W., & Wolf, J. B. W. (2015) · Journal of Avian Biology · doi:10.1111/jav.00619 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
A Severe Lack of Evidence Limits Effective Conservation of the World's Primates
Junker, J., Petrovan, S. O., Arroyo‐Rodríguez, V., Boonratana, R., Byler, D., Chapman, C. A., Chetry, D., Cheyne, S. M., Cornejo, F. M., Cortés‐Ortiz, L., et al. (2020) · BioScience · doi:10.1093/biosci/biaa082 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Browning, E., Bolton, M., Owen, E., Shoji, A., Guilford, T., & Freeman, R. (2018) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.12926 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Who Left the Dogs Out? 3D Animal Reconstruction with Expectation Maximization in the Loop
Biggs, B., Boyne, O., Charles, J., Fitzgibbon, A., & Cipolla, R. (2020) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-58621-8_12 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Desjonquères, C., Gifford, T., & Linke, S. (2019) · Freshwater Biology · doi:10.1111/fwb.13356 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Perspectives on Individual Animal Identification from Biology and Computer Vision
Vidal, M., Wolf, N., Rosenberg, B., Harris, B. P., & Mathis, A. (2021) · Integrative and Comparative Biology · doi:10.1093/icb/icab107 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Self-citationAn Animal Detection Pipeline for Identification
Parham, J., Stewart, C., Crall, J., Rubenstein, D., Holmberg, J., & Berger-Wolf, T. (2018) · 2018 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV) · doi:10.1109/wacv.2018.00123 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Self-citationDetecting small changes in populations at landscape scales: a bioacoustic site-occupancy framework
Wood, C. M., Popescu, V. D., Klinck, H., Keane, J. J., Gutiérrez, R. J., Sawyer, S. C., & Peery, M. Z. (2019) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.11.018 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Self-citationSchindler, F., & Steinhage, V. (2021) · Ecological Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ecoinf.2021.101215 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Species Distribution Modeling for Machine Learning Practitioners: A Review
Beery, S., Cole, E., Parker, J., Perona, P., & Winner, K. (2021) · ACM SIGCAS Conference on Computing and Sustainable Societies · doi:10.1145/3460112.3471966 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Self-citationEffects of Vegetation Structure on the Location of Lion Kill Sites in African Thicket
Davies, A. B., Tambling, C. J., Kerley, G. I. H., & Asner, G. P. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0149098 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Creatures Great and SMAL: Recovering the Shape and Motion of Animals from Video
Biggs, B., Roddick, T., Fitzgibbon, A., & Cipolla, R. (2019) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-20873-8_1 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Terrestrial mammalian wildlife responses to Unmanned Aerial Systems approaches
Bennitt, E., Bartlam-Brooks, H. L. A., Hubel, T. Y., & Wilson, A. M. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-38610-x · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Towards Automated Visual Monitoring of Individual Gorillas in the Wild
Brust, C.-A., Burghardt, T., Groenenberg, M., Käding, C., Kühl, H. S., Manguette, M. L., & Denzler, J. (2017) · IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops · doi:10.1109/iccvw.2017.333 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Self-citationOliver, R. Y., Meyer, C., Ranipeta, A., Winner, K., & Jetz, W. (2021) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3001336 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Real‐time anti‐poaching tags could help prevent imminent species extinctions
O'Donoghue, P. N., & Rutz, C. (2015) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2664.12452 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
An overview of deep learning methods for image registration with focus on feature-based approaches
Kuppala, K., Sandhya, B., & Barige, T. R. (2020) · International Journal of Image and Data Fusion · doi:10.1080/19479832.2019.1707720 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Discovery of new colonies by Sentinel2 reveals good and bad news for emperor penguins
Fretwell, P. T., & Trathan, P. N. (2020) · Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation · doi:10.1002/rse2.176 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Smoliński, S., & Radtke, K. (2017) · ICES Journal of Marine Science · doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsw136 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Machine learning for modeling animal movement
Wijeyakulasuriya, D. A., Eisenhauer, E., Shaby, B. A., & Hanks, E. M. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0235750 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Large-Area Photo-Mosaics Using Global Alignment and Navigation Data
Ferrer, J., Elibol, A., Delaunoy, O., Gracias, N., & Garcia, R. (2007) · OCEANS 2007 · doi:10.1109/oceans.2007.4449367 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Study becomes insight: Ecological learning from machine learning
Yu, Q., Ji, W., Prihodko, L., Ross, C. W., Anchang, J. Y., & Hanan, N. P. (2021) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.13686 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Schroeder, N. M., Panebianco, A., Gonzalez Musso, R., & Carmanchahi, P. (2020) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.191482 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
AcinoSet: A 3D Pose Estimation Dataset and Baseline Models for Cheetahs in the Wild
Joska, D., Clark, L., Muramatsu, N., Jericevich, R., Nicolls, F., Mathis, A., Mathis, M. W., & Patel, A. (2021) · 2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) · doi:10.1109/icra48506.2021.9561338 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Self-citation21 000 birds in 4.5 h: efficient large‐scale seabird detection with machine learning
Kellenberger, B., Veen, T., Folmer, E. O., & Tuia, D. (2021) · Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation · doi:10.1002/rse2.200 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Self-citationFaisal, A., Dondelinger, F., Husmeier, D., & Beale, C. M. (2010) · Ecological Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ecoinf.2010.06.005 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Critical Configurations for Radial Distortion Self-Calibration
Wu, C. (2014) · 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2014.11 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Machine learning enables improved runtime and precision for bio-loggers on seabirds
Korpela, J., Suzuki, H., Matsumoto, S., Mizutani, Y., Samejima, M., Maekawa, T., Nakai, J., & Yoda, K. (2020) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-020-01356-8 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
AIDE: Accelerating image‐based ecological surveys with interactive machine learning
Kellenberger, B., Tuia, D., & Morris, D. (2020) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.13489 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Self-citationPotential detection of illegal fishing by passive acoustic telemetry
Tickler, D. M., Carlisle, A. B., Chapple, T. K., Curnick, D. J., Dale, J. J., Schallert, R. J., & Block, B. A. (2019) · Animal Biotelemetry · doi:10.1186/s40317-019-0163-9 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Sherman, J., Ancrenaz, M., & Meijaard, E. (2020) · Journal for Nature Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.jnc.2020.125807 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Wildbook: Crowdsourcing, computer vision, and data science for conservationPreprint
Berger-Wolf, T. Y., Rubenstein, D. I., Stewart, C. V., Holmberg, J., Parham, J. R., Menon, S., Crall, J., Oast, J. V., Kıcıman, E., & Joppa, L. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1710.08880 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Self-citationTimely poacher detection and localization using sentinel animal movement
de Knegt, H. J., Eikelboom, J. A. J., van Langevelde, F., Spruyt, W. F., & Prins, H. H. T. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-83800-1 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Yu, H., Deng, J., Nathan, R., Kröschel, M., Pekarsky, S., Li, G., & Klaassen, M. (2021) · Movement Ecology · doi:10.1186/s40462-021-00245-x · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Lisein, J., Linchant, J., Lejeune, P., Bouché, P., & Vermeulen, C. (2013) · Tropical Conservation Science · doi:10.1177/194008291300600405 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Candid Critters: Challenges and Solutions in a Large-Scale Citizen Science Camera Trap Project
Lasky, M., Parsons, A. W., Schuttler, S., Mash, A., Larson, L. R., Norton, B., Pease, B. S., Boone, H. M., Gatens, L. J., & Kays, R. (2021) · Citizen Science Theory and Practice · doi:10.5334/cstp.343 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Self-citationTowards image-based animal tracking in natural environments using a freely moving camera
Haalck, L., Mangan, M., Webb, B., & Risse, B. (2020) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2019.108455 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Self-citationBaltensperger, A. P., & Huettmann, F. (2015) · Landscape Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10980-014-0150-8 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Locomotor compromises maintain group cohesion in baboon troops on the move
Harel, R., Loftus, J. C., & Crofoot, M. C. (2021) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2021.0839 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Self-citationA Novel Framework to Protect Animal Data in a World of Ecosurveillance
Lennox, R. J., Harcourt, R., Bennett, J. R., Davies, A., Ford, A. T., Frey, R. M., Hayward, M. W., Hussey, N. E., Iverson, S. J., Kays, R., et al. (2020) · BioScience · doi:10.1093/biosci/biaa035 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Self-citationAnimal population censusing at scale with citizen science and photographic identification
Parham, J. R., Crall, J., Stewart, C. V., Berger-Wolf, T. Y., & Rubenstein, D. I. (2017) · National Conference on Artificial Intelligence · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Self-citationSoftware to convert terrestrial LiDAR scans of natural environments into photorealistic meshes
Risse, B., Mangan, M., Stürzl, W., & Webb, B. (2018) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.09.018 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Self-citationKellenberger, B., Marcos, D., & Tuia, D. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) · doi:10.1109/cvprw.2019.00182 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Self-citationWeideman, H. J., Stewart, C. V., Parham, J. R., Holmberg, J., Flynn, K., Calambokidis, J., Paul, D. B., Bedetti, A., Henley, M., Lepirei, J., et al. (2020) · 2020 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV) · doi:10.1109/wacv45572.2020.9093266 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Self-citationBirds of a Feather: Capturing Avian Shape Models from Images
Wang, Y., Kolotouros, N., Daniilidis, K., & Badger, M. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.01450 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Digital taxonomist: Identifying plant species in community scientists’ photographs
de Lutio, R., She, Y., D’Aronco, S., Russo, S., Brun, P., Wegner, J. D., & Schindler, K. (2021) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2021.10.002 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Belyaev, M. Y., Volkov, O. N., Solomina, O. N., Weppler, J., Mueller, U., Tertitski, G., Wikelski, M., & Pitz, W. (2020) · Saint Petersburg International Conference on Integrated Navigation Systems · doi:10.23919/icins43215.2020.9133883 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Self-citationExploiting Data and Human Knowledge for Predicting Wildlife Poaching
Gurumurthy, S., Yu, L., Zhang, C., Jin, Y., Li, W., Zhang, X., & Fang, F. (2018) · Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCAS Conference on Computing and Sustainable Societies · doi:10.1145/3209811.3209879 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Botella, C., Joly, A., Bonnet, P., Munoz, F., & Monestiez, P. (2021) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.13565 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Deep learning powers a motion-tracking revolution
Kwok, R. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/d41586-019-02942-5 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Transferring Dense Pose to Proximal Animal Classes
Sanakoyeu, A., Khalidov, V., McCarthy, M. S., Vedaldi, A., & Neverova, N. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.00528 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Deep learning accurately predicts white shark locomotor activity from depth data
Liu, Z. Y.-C., Moxley, J. H., Kanive, P. E., Gleiss, A. C., Maughan, T., Bird, L. E., Jewell, O. J. D., Chapple, T. K., Gagné, T. O., White, C. F., et al. (2019) · Animal Biotelemetry · doi:10.1186/s40317-019-0175-5 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Čandek, K., Čandek, U. P., & Kuntner, M. (2020) · BMC Biology · doi:10.1186/s12915-020-00835-y · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Evaluation of Deep Species Distribution Models Using Environment and Co-occurrences
Deneu, B., Servajean, M., Botella, C., & Joly, A. (2019) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-28577-7_18 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Andrew, W., Greatwood, C. M., & Burghardt, T. (2019) · IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) · doi:10.1109/iros40897.2019.8968555 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Self-citationHaalck, L., & Risse, B. (2021) · 2021 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV) · doi:10.1109/wacv48630.2021.00189 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Self-citationGlobal and national trends in documenting and monitoring species distributionsPreprint
Oliver, R. Y., Meyer, C., Ranipeta, A., Winner, K., & Jetz, W. (2020) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2020.11.03.367011 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Ford, J. K. B. (2017) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-804327-1.00104-7 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Training machines to improve species identification using GBIF-mediated datasets
Copas, K., Robertson, T., Belongie, S., Kaeser‐Chen, C., Hartwig, A., Zhang, C., Tan, K. C., Liu, Y., Brulé, D., Deltheil, C., et al. (2019) · AGU Fall Meeting 2019 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 162 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Sugai, L. S. M., Silva, T. S. F., Ribeiro Jr, J. W. & Llusia, D. Terrestrial passive acoustic monitoring: review and perspectives. BioScience 69, 15–25 (2019). · DOI
- Kellenberger, B., Veen., T., Folmer, E. & Tuia, D. 21,000 birds in 4.5 hours: efficient large-scale seabird detection with machine learning. Remote Sens. Ecol. Conserv. https://doi.org/10.1002/rse2.200 (2021). · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A high-resolution canopy height model of the Earth
Lang, N., Jetz, W., Schindler, K., & Wegner, J. D. (2023) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-023-02206-6 · Cited by 810 · see citing works
Machine learning and deep learning—A review for ecologists
Pichler, M., & Hartig, F. (2023) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.14061 · Cited by 504 · see citing works
A Comprehensive Survey on TinyML
Abadade, Y., Temouden, A., Bamoumen, H., Benamar, N., Chtouki, Y., & Hafid, A. S. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3294111 · Cited by 366 · see citing works
“Authors in [87] discuss the use of ML techniques, including on-animal sensors for tracking movement and bioacoustic sensors, to gather data about wildlife and the environment.”
BackgroundTowards the fully automated monitoring of ecological communities
Besson, M., Alison, J., Bjerge, K., Gorochowski, T. E., Høye, T. T., Jucker, T., Mann, H. M. R., & Clements, C. F. (2022) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/ele.14123 · Cited by 279 · see citing works
Managing artificial intelligence
Krausman, P. R. (2023) · Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.1002/jwmg.22492 · Cited by 271 · see citing works
Shivaprakash, K. N., Swami, N., Mysorekar, S., Arora, R., Gangadharan, A., Vohra, K., Jadeyegowda, M., & Kiesecker, J. M. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14127154 · Cited by 194 · see citing works
Recent applications of AI to environmental disciplines: A review
Konya, A., & Nematzadeh, P. (2023) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167705 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
Koger, B., Deshpande, A., Kerby, J. T., Graving, J. M., Costelloe, B. R., & Couzin, I. D. (2023) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2656.13904 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Self-citationSoley‐Guardia, M., Alvarado‐Serrano, D. F., & Anderson, R. P. (2024) · Ecography · doi:10.1111/ecog.06852 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
SuperAnimal pretrained pose estimation models for behavioral analysis
Ye, S., Filippova, A., Lauer, J., Schneider, S., Vidal, M., Qiu, T., Mathis, A., & Mathis, M. W. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-48792-2 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Self-citationSun, D., Wu, X., Wen, H., Ma, X., Zhang, F., Ji, Q., & Zhang, J. (2024) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143252 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Community Monitoring of Natural Resource Systems and the Environment
Danielsen, F., Eicken, H. S., Funder, M., Johnson, N., Lee, O. A., Theilade, I., Argyriou, D., & Burgess, N. D. (2022) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-012220-022325 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Digital twins: dynamic model-data fusion for ecology
de Koning, K., Broekhuijsen, J., Kühn, I., Ovaskainen, O., Taubert, F., Endresen, D., Schigel, D., & Grimm, V. (2023) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2023.04.010 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Towards Risk‐Free Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence: Significance and Requirements
Alzubaidi, L., Al-Sabaawi, A., Bai, J., Dukhan, A., Alkenani, A. H., Al‐Asadi, A., Alwzwazy, H. A., Manoufali, M., Fadhel, M. A., Albahri, A. S., et al. (2023) · International Journal of Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1155/2023/4459198 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Opportunities and risks in the use of drones for studying animal behaviour
Schad, L., & Fischer, J. (2022) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.13922 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Exploring the potential and limitations of artificial intelligence in animal anatomy
Choudhary, O. P., Infant, S. S., As, V., Chopra, H., & Manuta, N. (2024) · Annals of Anatomy - Anatomischer Anzeiger · doi:10.1016/j.aanat.2024.152366 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Tan, M., Chao, W., Cheng, J.-K., Zhou, M., Ma, Y., Jiang, X., Ge, J., Yu, L. Z., & Feng, L. (2022) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani12151976 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Fennell, M., Beirne, C., & Burton, A. C. (2022) · Global Ecology and Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.gecco.2022.e02104 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Khanam, M. M., Uddin, M. K., & Kazi, J. U. (2025) · Frontiers in Environmental Science · doi:10.3389/fenvs.2025.1573579 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Ullah, F., Saqib, S., & Xiong, Y. (2024) · Biodiversity and Conservation · doi:10.1007/s10531-024-02977-9 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Empowering sustainability in the built environment: A technological Lens on industry 4.0 Enablers
Pachouri, V., Singh, R., Gehlot, A., Pandey, S., Akram, S. V., & Abbas, M. A. E. (2023) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102427 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Drone-based RGBT tiny person detection
Zhang, Y., Xu, C., Yang, W. T., He, G., Yu, H., Yu, L., & Xia, G.-S. (2023) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2023.08.016 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Novel community data in ecology-properties and prospects
Hartig, F., Abrego, N., Bush, A., Chase, J. M., Guillera‐Arroita, G., Leibold, M. A., Ovaskainen, O., Pellissier, L., Pichler, M., Poggiato, G., et al. (2023) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2023.09.017 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Decoding the brain: From neural representations to mechanistic models
Mathis, M. W., Rotondo, A. P., Chang, E. F., Tolias, A. S., & Mathis, A. (2024) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2024.08.051 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Self-citationEmerging technologies for behavioral research in changing environments
Couzin, I. D., & Heins, C. (2022) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2022.11.008 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Self-citationIslam, S. B., Valles, D., Hibbitts, T. J., Ryberg, W. A., Walkup, D. K., & Forstner, M. R. J. (2023) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani13091526 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
WildARe-YOLO: A lightweight and efficient wild animal recognition model
Bakana, S. R., Zhang, Y., & Twala, B. (2024) · Ecological Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ecoinf.2024.102541 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Using machine learning to decode animal communication
Rutz, C., Bronstein, M. M., Raskin, A., Vernes, S. C., Zacarian, K., & Blasi, D. E. (2023) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adg7314 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Systematic review of machine learning methods applied to ecoacoustics and soundscape monitoring
Nieto-Mora, D. A., Rodríguez‐Buriticá, S., Marín, P. A. R., Martínez-Vargaz, J. D., & Isaza, C. (2023) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20275 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Insect detect: An open-source DIY camera trap for automated insect monitoring
Sittinger, M., Uhler, J., Pink, M., & Herz, A. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0295474 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Harnessing artificial intelligence to fill global shortfalls in biodiversity knowledge
Pollock, L. J., Kitzes, J. A., Beery, S., Gaynor, K. M., Jarzyna, M. A., Aodha, O. M., Meyer, B. E., Rolnick, D., Taylor, G. W., Tuia, D., et al. (2025) · Nature Reviews Biodiversity · doi:10.1038/s44358-025-00022-3 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Self-citationAnimal tracking moves community ecology: Opportunities and challenges
Costa‐Pereira, R., Moll, R. J., Jesmer, B. R., & Jetz, W. (2022) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2656.13698 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
An Outlook for Deep Learning in Ecosystem Science
Perry, G. L. W., Seidl, R., Bellvé, A. M., & Rammer, W. (2022) · Ecosystems · doi:10.1007/s10021-022-00789-y · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Wiltshire, C., Lewis‐Cheetham, J., Komeda, V., Matsuzawa, T., Graham, K. E., & Hobaiter, C. (2023) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2656.13932 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
The Impact of Imperfect XAI on Human-AI Decision-Making
Morrison, K., Spitzer, P., Turri, V., Feng, M., Kühl, N., & Perer, A. (2024) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3641022 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Human vs. machine: Detecting wildlife in camera trap images
Leorna, S., & Brinkman, T. J. (2022) · Ecological Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ecoinf.2022.101876 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
A review of deep learning techniques for detecting animals in aerial and satellite images
Xu, Z., Wang, T., Skidmore, A. K., & Lamprey, R. H. (2024) · International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation · doi:10.1016/j.jag.2024.103732 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Choosing blocks for spatial cross-validation: lessons from a marine remote sensing case study
Stock, A. (2025) · Frontiers in Remote Sensing · doi:10.3389/frsen.2025.1531097 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Khan, F. F., Li, X., Temple, A. J., & Elhoseiny, M. (2023) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv51070.2023.01874 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
The Internet of Animals: what it is, what it could be
Kays, R., & Wikelski, M. C. (2023) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2023.04.007 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Self-citationThe quest to develop automated systems for monitoring animal behavior
Siegford, J. M., Steibel, J. P., Han, J., Benjamin, M., Brown-Brandl, T. M., Dórea, J. R. R., Morris, D., Norton, T., Psota, E. T., & Rosa, G. J. M. (2023) · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2023.106000 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Camera trapping expands the view into global biodiversity and its change
Oliver, R. Y., Iannarilli, F., Ahumada, J., Fegraus, E., Flores, N., Kays, R., Birch, T., Ranipeta, A., Rogan, M. S., Sica, Y. V., et al. (2023) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2022.0232 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Self-citationMachine Learning-Based Sensor Data Fusion for Animal Monitoring: Scoping Review
Aguilar-Lazcano, C. A., Espinosa‐Curiel, I. E., Ríos-Martínez, J. A., Madera-Ramírez, F., & Pérez-Espinosa, H. (2023) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s23125732 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Rigoudy, N., Dussert, G., Benyoub, A., Besnard, A. G., Birck, C., Boyer, J., Bollet, Y., Bunz, Y., de la Peña, G. C. G., Chetouane, E., et al. (2023) · European Journal of Wildlife Research · doi:10.1007/s10344-023-01742-7 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Simões, F., Bouveyron, C., & Precioso, F. (2023) · Ecological Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ecoinf.2023.102095 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
MammalNet: A Large-Scale Video Benchmark for Mammal Recognition and Behavior Understanding
Chen, J., Hu, M., Coker, D. J., Berumen, M. L., Costelloe, B. R., Beery, S., Rohrbach, A., & Elhoseiny, M. (2023) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52729.2023.01254 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Self-citationParsa, S. M., Norozpour, F., Shoeibi, S., Shahsavar, A., Aberoumand, S., Afrand, M., Said, Z., & Karimi, N. (2023) · Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers · doi:10.1016/j.jtice.2023.104854 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Automated wildlife image classification: An active learning tool for ecological applications
Bothmann, L., Wimmer, L., Charrakh, O., Weber, T. R., Edelhoff, H., Peters, W., Nguyen, H., Benjamin, C., & Menzel, A. (2023) · Ecological Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ecoinf.2023.102231 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Niu, Y., Fan, Y., & Ju, X. (2023) · Safety Science · doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106381 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Axford, D., Sohel, F. A., Vanderklift, M. A., & Hodgson, A. J. (2024) · Ecological Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ecoinf.2024.102842 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Deep learning and satellite remote sensing for biodiversity monitoring and conservation
Pettorelli, N., Williams, J., Bühne, H. S. T., & Crowson, M. (2024) · Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation · doi:10.1002/rse2.415 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Kyathanahally, S. P., Hardeman, T., Reyes, M., Merz, E., Bulas, T., Brun, P., Pomati, F., & Baity‐Jesi, M. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-21910-0 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Cardoso, A. S., Bryukhova, S., Renna, F., Reino, L., Xu, C., Xiao, Z., Correia, R. A., Minin, E. D., Ribeiro, J., & Vaz, A. S. (2023) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2023.109905 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Data leakage jeopardizes ecological applications of machine learning
Stock, A., Gregr, E. J., & Chan, K. M. A. (2023) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-023-02162-1 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Generative AI as a tool to accelerate the field of ecology
Rafiq, K., Beery, S., Palmer, M. S., Harchaoui, Z., & Abrahms, B. L. (2025) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-024-02623-1 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Self-citationA dataset for benchmarking Neotropical anuran calls identification in passive acoustic monitoring
Cañas, J. S., Toro-Gómez, M. P., Sugai, L. S. M., Restrepo, H. D. B., Rudas, J., Bautista, B. P., Toledo, L. F., Dena, S., Domingos, A. H. R., Souza, F. L., et al. (2023) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/s41597-023-02666-2 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
ODinMJ: A red, green, blue-thermal dataset for mountain jungle object detection
Wang, Q., Qu, X., Jin, P., Zhou, L., Ouyang, J., Song, H., Cheng, B., Shen, T., & Gu, Y. (2024) · IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine · doi:10.1109/mgrs.2024.3492069 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Raza, A., Hanif, F., & Mohammed, H. A. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-26645-2 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
BEANS: The Benchmark of Animal Sounds
Hagiwara, M., Hoffman, B., Liu, J.-Y., Cusimano, M., Effenberger, F., & Zacarian, K. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp49357.2023.10096686 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Elephants and algorithms: a review of the current and future role of AI in elephant monitoring
Brickson, L. L., Zhang, L., Vollrath, F. W., Douglas‐Hamilton, I., & Titus, A. (2023) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2023.0367 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Drone Technologies: A Tertiary Systematic Literature Review on a Decade of Improvements
Doornbos, J., Bennin, K. E., Babur, Ö., & Valente, J. R. P. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3364676 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Understanding and predicting animal movements and distributions in the Anthropocene
Gomez, S., English, H. M., Alegre, V. B., Blackwell, P. G., Bracken, A. M., Bray, E., Evans, L. C., Gan, J. L., Grecian, W. J., Roberts, C. G., et al. (2025) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2656.70040 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
CATER: Combined Animal Tracking & Environment Reconstruction
Haalck, L., Mangan, M., Wystrach, A., Clément, L., Webb, B. H., & Risse, B. (2023) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.adg2094 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Self-citationAn overview of the impacts of fishing on seabirds, including identifying future research directions
Votier, S. C., Sherley, R. B., Scales, K. L., Camphuysen, C. J., & Phillips, R. A. (2023) · ICES Journal of Marine Science · doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsad173 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
AVES: Animal Vocalization Encoder Based on Self-Supervision
Hagiwara, M. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp49357.2023.10095642 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
SMART-BARN: Scalable multimodal arena for real-time tracking behavior of animals in large numbers
Nagy, M., Naik, H., Kano, F., Carlson, N. V., Koblitz, J. C., Wikelski, M. C., & Couzin, I. D. (2023) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.adf8068 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Self-citationMohammadi, S., Belgiu, M., & Stein, A. (2024) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2024.114385 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Bhagabati, B., Sarma, K. K., & Bora, K. C. (2023) · Ecological Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ecoinf.2023.102398 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Drones and AI-Driven Solutions for Wildlife Monitoring
Aliane, N. (2025) · Drones · doi:10.3390/drones9070455 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Past and future uses of text mining in ecology and evolution
Farrell, M. J., Brierley, L., Willoughby, A. R., Yates, A., & Mideo, N. (2022) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2021.2721 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Antonelli, A., Dhanjal‐Adams, K. L., & Silvestro, D. (2022) · Plants People Planet · doi:10.1002/ppp3.10337 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
An automated work-flow for pinniped surveys: A new tool for monitoring population dynamics
Infantes, E., Carroll, D., Silva, W. T. A. F., Härkönen, T. J., Edwards, S. V., & Hårding, K. C. (2022) · Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.3389/fevo.2022.905309 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
AddaxAI: A no-code platform to train and deploy custom YOLOv5 object detection models
van Lunteren, P. (2023) · The Journal of Open Source Software · doi:10.21105/joss.05581 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Beyond observation: Deep learning for animal behavior and ecological conservation
Saoud, L. S., Sultan, A., Elmezain, M., Heshmat, M., Seneviratne, L. D., & Hussain, I. (2024) · Ecological Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ecoinf.2024.102893 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
The Caltech Fish Counting Dataset: A Benchmark for Multiple-Object Tracking and Counting
Kay, J., Kulits, P., Stathatos, S., Deng, S., Young, E., Beery, S., Horn, G. V., & Perona, P. (2022) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-20074-8_17 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Self-citationChen, X., Pu, H. H., He, Y., Lai, M., Zhang, D., Chen, J., & Pu, H. (2023) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani13101713 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Ware, L., Mahon, C. L., McLeod, L. J. T., & Jetté, J.-F. (2023) · Canadian Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1139/cjz-2023-0044 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Global research priorities for historical ecology to inform conservation
McClenachan, L., Rick, T. C., Thurstan, R. H., Trant, A. J., Alagona, P., Alleway, H., Armstrong, C., Bird, R. B., Rubio‐Cisneros, N. T., Clavero, M., et al. (2024) · Endangered Species Research · doi:10.3354/esr01338 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
“AI for all” is a matter of social justice
Buccella, A. (2022) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-022-00222-z · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Applications of machine learning to identify and characterize the sounds produced by fish
Barroso, V. R., Xavier, F. C., & Ferreira, C. E. L. (2023) · ICES Journal of Marine Science · doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsad126 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Gabeff, V., Rußwurm, M., Tuia, D., & Mathis, A. (2024) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-024-02026-6 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Self-citationA unified paradigm for defining elasmobranch aggregations
McInturf, A. G., Bowman, J., Schulte, J. M., Newton, K. C., Vigil, B., Honig, M., Pelletier, S., Cox, N., Lester, O., Cantor, M., et al. (2023) · ICES Journal of Marine Science · doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsad099 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Guo, H., Chen, F., Tang, Y., Ding, Y., Chen, M., Zhou, W., Zhu, M., Gao, S. H., Yang, R., Zheng, W., et al. (2023) · The Innovation · doi:10.1016/j.xinn.2023.100496 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Naik, H., Chan, A. H. H., Yang, J., Delacoux, M., Couzin, I. D., Kano, F., & Nagy, M. (2023) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52729.2023.02038 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Self-citationDrivers and solutions to Southeast Asia’s biodiversity crisis
Struebig, M. J., Lee, J. S. H., Deere, N. J., Gevaña, D. T., Ingram, D. J., Lwin, N., Nguyen, T. H. T., Santika, T., Seaman, D. J. I., Supriatna, J., et al. (2025) · Nature Reviews Biodiversity · doi:10.1038/s44358-025-00064-7 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Bioinspired robots can foster nature conservation
Chellapurath, M., Khandelwal, P. C., & Schulz, A. (2023) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.3389/frobt.2023.1145798 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Chan, A. H. H., Putra, P. U., Schupp, H. T., Köchling, J., Straßheim, J., Renner, B., Schroeder, J., Pearse, W. D., Nakagawa, S., Burke, T. A., et al. (2025) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.14502 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
All thresholds barred: direct estimation of call density in bioacoustic data
Navine, A. K., Denton, T., Weldy, M. J., & Hart, P. J. (2024) · Frontiers in Bird Science · doi:10.3389/fbirs.2024.1380636 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Hutschenreiter, A., Andresen, E., Jaramillo, M. B., Torres‐Araneda, A., Pinel-Ramos, E. J., Baier, J., & Aureli, F. (2024) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.14333 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Development of a cost-efficient automated wildlife camera network in a European Natura 2000 site
Kissling, W. D., Evans, J., Zilber, R., Breeze, T. D., Shinneman, S., Schneider, L. C., Chalmers, C., Fergus, P., Wich, S. A., & Geelen, L. H. W. T. (2024) · Basic and Applied Ecology · doi:10.1016/j.baae.2024.06.006 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
An African perspective to biodiversity conservation in the twenty-first century
Bezeng, B. S., Ameka, G. K., Angui, C. M. V., Atuah, L., Azihou, F., Bouchenak‐Khelladi, Y., Carlisle, F., Serges, D. B. T., Gaoue, O. G., Gatarabirwa, W., et al. (2025) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2023.0443 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Conservation tools: the next generation of engineering–biology collaborations
Schulz, A., Shriver, C., Stathatos, S., Seleb, B., Weigel, E., Chang, Y., Bhamla, M. S., Hu, D. L., & MENDELSON, J. R. I. (2023) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2023.0232 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
The conservation value of forests can be predicted at the scale of 1 hectare
Bubnicki, J. W., Angelstam, P. K., Mikusiński, G., Svensson, J. S., & Jonsson, B. G. (2024) · Communications Earth & Environment · doi:10.1038/s43247-024-01325-7 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Duarte, A., Weldy, M. J., Lesmeister, D. B., Ruff, Z. J., Jenkins, J. M. A., Valente, J. J., & Betts, M. G. (2024) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112016 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Wildlife detection, counting and survey using satellite imagery: are we there yet?
Delplanque, A., Théau, J., Foucher, S., Serati, G., Durand, S., & Lejeune, P. (2024) · GIScience & Remote Sensing · doi:10.1080/15481603.2024.2348863 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Zbinden, R., van Tiel, N., Kellenberger, B., Hughes, L. H., & Tuia, D. (2024) · Ecological Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ecoinf.2024.102623 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Self-citationA benchmark for computational analysis of animal behavior, using animal-borne tags
Hoffman, B., Cusimano, M., Baglione, V., Canestrari, D., Chevallier, D., DeSantis, D. L., Jeantet, L., Ladds, M., Maekawa, T., Mata‐Silva, V., et al. (2024) · Movement Ecology · doi:10.1186/s40462-024-00511-8 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Disgust in animals and the application of disease avoidance to wildlife management and conservation
Sarabian, C., Wilkinson, A., Sigaud, M., Kano, F., Tobajas, J., Darmaillacq, A., Kalema‐Zikusoka, G., Plotnik, J. M., & MacIntosh, A. J. J. (2023) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2656.13903 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
LoTE-Animal: A Long Time-span Dataset for Endangered Animal Behavior Understanding
Liu, D., Hou, J., Huang, S., Liu, J., He, Y., Zheng, B., Ning, J., & Zhang, J. (2023) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv51070.2023.01836 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
The limits of acoustic indices
Llusia, D. (2024) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-024-02348-1 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
- Authors
- Tuia, D., Kellenberger, B., Beery, S., Costelloe, B. R., Zuffi, S., Risse, B., Mathis, A., Mathis, M. W., van Langevelde, F., Burghardt, T., Kays, R., Klinck, H., Wikelski, M., Couzin, I. D., van Horn, G., Crofoot, M. C., Stewart, C. V., & Berger-Wolf, T.
- Affiliations
- École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
- California Institute of Technology (US)
- University of Konstanz (DE)
- Istituto di Matematica Applicata e Tecnologie Informatiche (IT)
- University of Münster (DE)
- University of Bristol (GB)
- North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences (US)
- Cornell University (US)
- Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (US)
- The Ohio State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Tuia, Devis
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature Communications
- Published
- 2022-02-09
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 792-792
- ISSN
- 2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC8828720
- OpenAlex
- W4210883322
- Semantic Scholar
- d9b34c6b616f75485856794478bfbeab1ea93b81
- Cited by
- 740
- References
- 162
- Citations by year
- 2026: 189 · 2025: 192 · 2024: 156 · 2023: 144 · 2022: 59
- FWCI
- 12.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- CNR ExploRA (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- KOPS (University of Konstanz) (submittedVersion)
- Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1745301, IIS 1514174, IOS 1250895, 1453555, 1550853)
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (EXC 2117-422037984)
- Fondation Bertarelli
- David and Lucile Packard Foundation (2016-65130)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecological Modeling › Species Distribution and Climate Change
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
- Keywords
- machine learning, wildlife conservation, animal ecology, low-cost sensors, ecological data, hybrid modeling, domain knowledge integration, ecological modeling, interdisciplinary collaboration, data science education
- MeSH terms
- Machine Learning, Animals, Animals, Wild, Automation, Conservation of Natural Resources, Ecology, Models, Theoretical, Ecosystem, Knowledge
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review