Cited by 45

Evaluating acoustic indices in the Valdivian rainforest, a biodiversity hotspot in South America

Moreno-Gómez, Felipe N., Bartheld, José, Silva-Escobar, Andrés A., Briones, Raúl, Márquez, Rafael, Penna, Mario·2019·Ecological Indicators

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.03.024

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Analyses that included random factors for daily samples and/or recorders per site, or used other statistical techniques dealing with pseudoreplication and autocorrelation, were not considered as presenting pseudoreplication.

    “Analyses taking into account pseudoreplication, such as tests that included random factors for daily samples and/or recorders per site [e.g. LMM (Fuller et al., 2015; Buxton et al., 2016)], as well as other statistical techniques dealing with pseudoreplication and autocorrelation (e.g. bootstrapping; Moreno‐Gómez et al., 2019), were not considered as presenting pseudoreplication.”

    From Acoustic indices as proxies for biodiversity: a meta‐analysis (2022) · cites this paper as Moreno‐Gómez et al., 2019

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moreno-Gómez, F. N., Bartheld, J., Silva-Escobar, A. A., Briones, R., Márquez, R., & Penna, M.
Venue
Ecological Indicators
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-08
Volume
103
Pages
1-8
ISSN
1470-160X
Cited by
45
References
2
Language
en
Funders
  • MINEDUC
  • Universidad de Chile

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review