Cited by 1,334Noise Effects and ManagementAnimal Vocal Communication and BehaviorSound Studies and Aurality

Soundscape Ecology: The Science of Sound in the Landscape

Pijanowski, Bryan C., Villanueva-Rivera, Luis J., Dumyahn, Sarah L., Farina, Almo, Krause, Bernie L., Napoletano, Brian M., Gage, Stuart H., Pieretti, Nadia·2011·BioScience

Abstract

This article presents a unifying theory of soundscape ecology, which brings the idea of the soundscape—the collection of sounds that emanate from landscapes—into a research and application focus. Our conceptual framework of soundscape ecology is based on the causes and consequences of biological (biophony), geophysical (geophony), and human-produced (anthrophony) sounds. We argue that soundscape ecology shares many parallels with landscape ecology, and it should therefore be considered a branch of this maturing field. We propose a research agenda for soundscape ecology that includes six areas: (1) measurement and analytical challenges, (2) spatial-temporal dynamics, (3) soundscape linkage to environmental covariates, (4) human impacts on the soundscape, (5) soundscape impacts on humans, and (6) soundscape impacts on ecosystems. We present case studies that illustrate different approaches to understanding soundscape dynamics. Because soundscapes are our auditory link to nature, we also argue for their protection, using the knowledge of how sounds are produced by the environment and humans.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1525/bio.2011.61.3.6

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 51 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pijanowski, B. C., Villanueva-Rivera, L. J., Dumyahn, S. L., Farina, A., Krause, B. L., Napoletano, B. M., Gage, S. H., & Pieretti, N.
Venue
BioScience
Published
2011-03
Volume
61
Issue
3
Pages
203-216
ISSN
  • 0006-3568 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-3244
OpenAlex
W2136738044
Cited by
1,334
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 122 · 2025: 166 · 2024: 119 · 2023: 130 · 2022: 121 · 2021: 117 · 2020: 90 · 2019: 118 · 2018: 83 · 2017: 79 · 2016: 54 · 2015: 49 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 14
FWCI
64.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • BioScience (publishedVersion)
  • BioOne Complete (BioOne) (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutional Research information system (University of Urbino) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • Purdue University
  • Michigan State University
  • College of Engineering, Michigan State University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Noise Effects and Management
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sound Studies and Aurality
Keywords
soundscape ecology, soundscape, biophony, geophony, anthrophony, landscape ecology, spatiotemporal dynamics, environmental variables

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review