Cited by 50Land Use and Ecosystem ServicesSpatial and Panel Data AnalysisAgriculture, Land Use, Rural Development

Reducing the loss of information and gaining accuracy with clustering methods in a global land-use model

Open access
Dietrich, Jan Philipp, Popp, Alexander, Lotze-Campen, Hermann·2013·Ecological Modelling

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.05.009

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Outputs with high resolution may be aggregated via clustering methods to provide insights, while at coarser resolution, statistical downscaling can help to disaggregate data to an appropriate spatial resolution, as seen in applications such as crop yield, wind speed or surface temperature.

    “Outputs with high resolution may be aggregated via clustering methods to provide insights [183], while at coarser resolution, statistical downscaling can help to disaggregate data to an appropriate spatial resolution, as seen in applications such as crop yield [249], wind speed [479] or surface temperature [481].”

    From Tackling climate change with machine learning (2023) · cites this paper as [183]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 42 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dietrich, J. P., Popp, A., & Lotze-Campen, H.
Affiliations
  • Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
  • Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (DE)
Corresponding author
Dietrich, Jan Philipp
Venue
Ecological Modelling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-08
Volume
263
Pages
233-243
ISSN
0304-3800 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1985296730
Cited by
50
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3
FWCI
2.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Ecological Modelling (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Publication Database PIK (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK)) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Spatial and Panel Data Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
Keywords
land use modeling, spatial aggregation, clustering algorithms, information conservation, bottom-up clustering, computational efficiency, model accuracy, spatial scale

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review