The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Estimating optimal complexity for ecological niche models: A jackknife approach for species with small sample sizes
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas
Hijmans, R. J., Cameron, S. E., Parra, J. L., Jones, P. G., & Jarvis, A. (2005) · International Journal of Climatology · doi:10.1002/joc.1276 · Cited by 19,825
Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions
Phillips, S. J., Anderson, R. P., & Schapire, R. E. (2006) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.026 · Cited by 15,396
Self-citationA statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists
Elith, J., Phillips, S. J., Hastie, T., Dudík, M., Chee, Y. E., & Yates, C. J. (2011) · Diversity and Distributions · doi:10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00725.x · Cited by 6,699
Modeling of species distributions with Maxent: new extensions and a comprehensive evaluation
Phillips, S. J., & Dudík, M. (2008) · Ecography · doi:10.1111/j.0906-7590.2008.5203.x · Cited by 5,890
AUC: A misleading measure of the performance of predictive distribution models
Lobo, J. M., Jiménez‐Valverde, A., & Real, R. (2008) · Global Ecology and Biogeography · doi:10.1111/j.1466-8238.2007.00358.x · Cited by 3,499
Pearson, R. G., Raxworthy, C. J., Nakamura, M., & Townsend Peterson, A. (2007) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01594.x · Cited by 3,138
Phillips, S. J., Dudík, M., Elith, J., Graham, C. H., Lehmann, A., Leathwick, J., & Ferrier, S. (2009) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/07-2153.1 · Cited by 2,996
The art of modelling range-shifting species: The art of modelling range-shifting species
Elith, J., Kearney, M., & Phillips, S. (2010) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.2041-210x.2010.00036.x · Cited by 2,813
Selecting thresholds of occurrence in the prediction of species distributions
Liu, C., Berry, P. M., Dawson, T. P., & Pearson, R. G. (2005) · Ecography · doi:10.1111/j.0906-7590.2005.03957.x · Cited by 2,701
ENVIRONMENTAL NICHE EQUIVALENCY VERSUS CONSERVATISM: QUANTITATIVE APPROACHES TO NICHE EVOLUTION
Warren, D. L., Glor, R. E., & Turelli, M. (2008) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00482.x · Cited by 2,663
Cited by
Aiello‐Lammens, M. E., Boria, R. A., Radosavljevic, A., Vilela, B., & Anderson, R. P. (2015) · Ecography · doi:10.1111/ecog.01132 · Cited by 2,350
Self-citationMuscarella, R., Galante, P. J., Soley‐Guardia, M., Boria, R. A., Kass, J. M., Uriarte, M., & Anderson, R. P. (2014) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.12261 · Cited by 1,962
Self-citationMaking better M axent models of species distributions: complexity, overfitting and evaluation
Radosavljevic, A., & Anderson, R. P. (2014) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.1111/jbi.12227 · Cited by 1,723
Self-citationSpatial filtering to reduce sampling bias can improve the performance of ecological niche models
Boria, R. A., Olson, L. E., Goodman, S. M., & Anderson, R. P. (2014) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.12.012 · Cited by 1,524
Self-citationBrown, J. L. (2014) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.12200 · Cited by 1,254
Metadata
- Authors
- Shcheglovitova, M., & Anderson, R. P.
- Venue
- Ecological Modelling
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-11
- Volume
- 269
- Pages
- 9-17
- ISSN
- 0304-3800 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2052030669
- Cited by
- 631
- References
- 31
- FWCI
- 13.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Estimating optimal complexity for ecological niche models: A jackknife approach for species with small sample sizes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.08.011
- The paper
- Shcheglovitova, M., & Anderson, R. P. (2013). Estimating optimal complexity for ecological niche models: A jackknife approach for species with small sample sizes. Ecological Modelling. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.08.011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
