CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 15,396

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions

Phillips, Steven J., Anderson, Robert P., Schapire, Robert E.·2006·Ecological Modelling
DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.026
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.026

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 64

  1. Anderson, 2003, Real vs. artefactual absences in species distributions: tests for Oryzomys albigularis(Rodentia: Muridae) in Venezuela, J. Biogeogr., 30, 591, 10.1046/j.1365-2699.2003.00867.x · DOI
  2. Anderson, 2002, Geographical distributions of spiny pocket mice in South America: insights from predictive models, Global Ecol. Biogeogr., 11, 131, 10.1046/j.1466-822X.2002.00275.x · DOI
  3. Anderson, 2001, A new species of three-toed sloth (Mammalia: Xenarthra) from Panamá, with a review of the genus Bradypus, Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 114, 1
  4. Anderson, 2003, Evaluating predictive models of species’ distributions: criteria for selecting optimal models, Ecol. Model., 162, 211, 10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00349-6 · DOI
  5. Anderson, 2004, Modeling species’ geographic distributions for preliminary conservation assessments: an implementation with the spiny pocket mice (Heteromys) of Ecuador, Biol. Conser., 116, 167, 10.1016/S0006-3207(03)00187-3 · DOI
  6. Anderson, 2002, Using niche-based GIS modeling to test geographic predictions of competitive exclusion and competitive release in South American pocket mice, Oikos, 98, 3, 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.t01-1-980116.x · DOI
  7. Aoki, 1989, Holological study of lakes from an entropy viewpoint – Lake Mendota, Ecol. Model., 45, 81, 10.1016/0304-3800(89)90085-9 · DOI
  8. Aspinall, 1992, An inductive modeling procedure based on Bayes’ theorem for analysis of pattern in spatial data, Int. J. Geogr. Inform. Syst., 6, 105, 10.1080/02693799208901899 · DOI
  9. Austin, 2002, Spatial prediction of species distribution: an interface between ecological theory and statistical modelling, Ecol. Model., 157, 101, 10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00205-3 · DOI
  10. Baker, 1998, Bioinformatics, museums, and society: integrating biological data for knowledge-based decisions, Occasional Papers Museum Texas Tech Univ., 187, 1
  11. Berger, 1996, A maximum entropy approach to natural language processing, Comput. Linguist., 22, 39
  12. Bisby, 2000, The quiet revolution: biodiversity informatics and the internet, Science, 289, 2309, 10.1126/science.289.5488.2309 · DOI
  13. Busby, 1986, A biogeographical analysis of Nothofagus cunninghamii (Hook.) Oerst. in southeastern Australia, Aust. J. Ecol., 11, 1, 10.1111/j.1442-9993.1986.tb00912.x · DOI
  14. Carleton, 1989, Systematic studies of oryzomyine rodents (Muridae, Sigmodontinae): a synopsis of Microryzomys, Bull. Am. Museum Nat. History, 119, 1
  15. Carpenter, 1993, DOMAIN: a flexible modeling procedure for mapping potential distributions of plants, animals, Biodivers. Conserv., 2, 667, 10.1007/BF00051966 · DOI
  16. Corsi, 1999, A large-scale model of wolf distribution in Italy for conservation planning, Conserv. Biol., 13, 150, 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.97269.x · DOI
  17. Della Pietra, 1997, Inducing features of random fields, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 19, 1, 10.1109/34.588021 · DOI
  18. Engler, 2004, An improved approach for predicting the distribution of rare and endangered species from occurrence and pseudo-absence data, J. Appl. Ecol., 41, 263, 10.1111/j.0021-8901.2004.00881.x · DOI
  19. Ferrier, 2002, Extended statistical approaches to modelling spatial pattern in biodiversity in northeast New South Wales. 1. Species-level modeling, Biodivers. Conserv., 11, 2275, 10.1023/A:1021302930424 · DOI
  20. Fielding, 1997, A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models, Env. Conserv., 24, 38, 10.1017/S0376892997000088 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Gouvêa, 1999, Mamíferos do Parque Nacional do Itatiaia, Revista Científica do Centro Universitário do Barra Mansa, UBM, 1, 11
  22. Graham, 2004, New developments in museum-based informatics and applications in biodiversity analysis, Trends Ecol. Evol., 19, 497, 10.1016/j.tree.2004.07.006 · DOI
  23. Guisan, 2002, Generalized linear and generalized additive models in studies of species distributions: setting the scene, Ecol. Model., 157, 89, 10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00204-1 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Guisan, 2000, Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology, Ecol. Model., 135, 147, 10.1016/S0304-3800(00)00354-9 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Hanley, 1982, The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, Radiology, 143, 29, 10.1148/radiology.143.1.7063747 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Hanley, 1983, A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases, Radiology, 148, 839, 10.1148/radiology.148.3.6878708 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Hershkovitz, 1998, Report on some sigmodontine rodents collected in southeastern Brazil with descriptions of a new genus and six new species, Bonner zoologische Beiträge, 47, 193
  28. Hirzel, 2002, Ecological-niche factor analysis: how to compute habitat-suitability maps without absence data?, Ecology, 87, 2027, 10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[2027:ENFAHT]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  29. Joseph, 2002, Climatic modeling of the distribution of some Pyrrhura parakeets of northwestern South America with notes on their systematics and special reference to Pyrrhura caeruleiceps Todd, 1947, Ornitología Neotropical, 13, 1
  30. Mackey, 2001, Towards a hierarchical framework for modelling the spatial distribution of animals, J. Biogeogr., 28, 1147, 10.1046/j.1365-2699.2001.00626.x · DOI
  31. McPherson, 1985, A biogeographical analysis of factors influencing the distribution of Costa Rican rodents, Brenesia, 23, 97
  32. New, 1999, Representing twentieth-century space-time climate variability. Part 1. Development of a 1961–90 mean monthly terrestrial climatology, J. Climate, 12, 829, 10.1175/1520-0442(1999)012<0829:RTCSTC>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  33. Ng, 2001, On discriminative versus generative classifiers: a comparison of logistic regression and naive Bayes, Adv. Neural Inform. Process. Syst., 14, 605
  34. Pearson, 2004, Modelling species distributions in Britain: a hierarchical integration of climate and land-cover data, Ecography, 27, 285, 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2004.03740.x · DOI
  35. Pérez-Hernández, 1997, Los museos de historia natural vinculados con la universidad venezolana y sus perspectivas hacia el siglo XXI, Acta Científica Venezolana, 48, 177
  36. Peterson, 1999, Sensitivity of distributional prediction algorithms to geographic data completeness, Ecol. Model., 117, 154
  37. Peterson, 2003, Niche differentiation in Mexican birds: using point occurrences to detect ecological innovation, Ecol. Lett., 6, 774, 10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00502.x · DOI
  38. Peterson, 2003, New distributional modeling approaches for gap analysis, Anim. Conserv., 6, 47, 10.1017/S136794300300307X · DOI
  39. Peterson, 2003, Using ecological-niche modeling to predict barred owl invasions with implications for spotted owl conservation, Conserv. Biol., 17, 1161, 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.02206.x · DOI
  40. Peterson, 2003, Lutzomyia vectors for cutaneous leishmaniasis in southern Brazil: ecological niche models, predicted geographic distribution, and climate change effects, Int. J. Parasitol., 33, 919, 10.1016/S0020-7519(03)00094-8 · DOI
  41. Peterson, 1999, Conservatism of ecological niches in evolutionary time, Science, 285, 1265, 10.1126/science.285.5431.1265 · DOI
  42. Ponder, 2001, Evaluation of museum collection data for use in biodiversity assessment, Conserv. Biol., 15, 648, 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.015003648.x · DOI
  43. Pulliam, 2000, On the relationship between niche and distribution, Ecol. Lett., 3, 349, 10.1046/j.1461-0248.2000.00143.x · DOI
  44. Ratnaparkhi, A., 1998. Maximum entropy models for natural language ambiguity resolution. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
  45. Reddy, 2003, Geographical sampling bias and its implications for conservation priorities in Africa, J. Biogeogr., 30, 1719, 10.1046/j.1365-2699.2003.00946.x · DOI
  46. Root, 1988, Environmental factors associated with avian distributional boundaries, J. Biogeogr., 15, 489, 10.2307/2845278 · DOI
  47. Schneider, 1994, Life as a manifestation of the second law of thermodynamics, Math. Comput. Model., 19, 25, 10.1016/0895-7177(94)90188-0 · DOI
  48. Soberón, 1999, Linking biodiversity information sources, Trends Ecol. Evol., 14, 291, 10.1016/S0169-5347(99)01617-1 · DOI
  49. Soberón, 2004, Biodiversity informatics: managing and applying primary biodiversity data, Philos. Trans. Royal Soc. Lond. B, 359, 689, 10.1098/rstb.2003.1439 · DOI
  50. Stein, 2004, Mammals of the world: MaNIS as an example of data integration in a distributed network environment, Biodivers. Inform., 1, 14
  51. Stockwell, 1999, The GARP modeling system: problems and solutions to automated spatial prediction, Int. J. Geograph. Inform. Sci., 13, 143, 10.1080/136588199241391 · DOI
  52. Stockwell, 1992, Induction of sets of rules from animal distribution data: a robust and informative method of data analysis, Math. Comput. Simul., 33, 385, 10.1016/0378-4754(92)90126-2 · DOI
  53. Stockwell, 2002, Effects of sample size on accuracy of species distribution models, Ecol. Model., 148, 1, 10.1016/S0304-3800(01)00388-X · DOI
  54. Suarez, 2004, The value of museum collections for research and society, BioScience, 54, 66, 10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0066:TVOMCF]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  55. Tate, 1939, The mammals of the Guiana region, Bull. Am. Museum Nat. History, 76, 151
  56. Thomas, 2004, Extinction risk from climate change, Nature, 427, 145, 10.1038/nature02121 · DOI
  57. Vida, 1993, A computer program for non-parametric receiver operating characteristic analysis, Comput. Meth. Prog. Biomed., 40, 95, 10.1016/0169-2607(93)90004-5 · DOI
  58. Welk, 2002, Present and potential distribution of invasive mustard (Alliara petiolata) in North America, Divers. Distributions, 8, 219, 10.1046/j.1472-4642.2002.00144.x · DOI
  59. Wiley, 2003, Niche modeling and geographic range predictions in the marine environment using a machine-learning algorithm, Oceanography, 16, 120, 10.5670/oceanog.2003.42 · DOI
  60. Williams, 1995, Bayesian regularization and pruning using a Laplace prior, Neural Comput., 7, 117, 10.1162/neco.1995.7.1.117 · DOI · Paper page
  61. Yee, 1991, Generalized additive models in plant ecology, J. Veg. Sci., 2, 587, 10.2307/3236170 · DOI
  62. Yom-Tov, 1998, Analysis of the distribution of insectivorous bats in Israel, Divers. Distributions, 4, 63, 10.1046/j.1472-4642.1998.00012.x · DOI
  63. Zaniewski, 2002, Predicting species spatial distributions using presence-only data: a case study of native New Zealand ferns, Ecol. Model., 157, 261, 10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00199-0 · DOI
  64. Zweig, 1993, Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine, Clin. Chem., 39, 561, 10.1093/clinchem/39.4.561 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Phillips, S. J., Anderson, R. P., & Schapire, R. E.
Venue
Ecological Modelling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-01
Volume
190
Issue
3-4
Pages
231-259
ISSN
0304-3800
DOI
10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.026
Cited by
15,396
References
5
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review