The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A time allocation study of university faculty
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For example, professors who had not been promoted to full professor after seven years reported spending more time on teaching and less time on research than did professors promoted in less than seven years (Link et al., 2008).”
From Faculty Time Expenditure Across Research, Teaching, and Service: Do Gender Differences Persist? (2023) · cites this paper as Link et al., 2008
In the citing paper
“For example, professors who had not been promoted to full professor after seven years reported spending more time on teaching and less time on research than did professors promoted in less than seven years (Link et al., 2008).”
From Faculty Time Expenditure Across Research, Teaching, and Service: Do Gender Differences Persist? (2023) · cites this paper as Link et al., 2008
In the citing paper
“Research has also shown that faculty rank can impact faculty time allocation (Link et al., 2008).”
From Faculty Time Expenditure Across Research, Teaching, and Service: Do Gender Differences Persist? (2023) · cites this paper as Link et al., 2008
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- Bellas, 1999, Faculty time allocations and research productivity: Gender, race and family effects, The Review of Higher Education, 22, 367, 10.1353/rhe.1999.0014 · DOI
- Chen, 1999, A theory of tenure for the teaching university, Australian Economic Papers, 38, 9, 10.1111/1467-8454.00038 · DOI
- Grogger, 1998, Market wages and youth crimes, Journal of Labor Economics, 16, 756, 10.1086/209905 · DOI
- Hamermesh, D. S. (2005). An old male economist's advice to young female economists. Newsletter of the Committee on the Status of Women in the Economics Profession, pp. 11–12.
- Juster, 1991, The allocation of time: Empirical findings, theoretical models, and problems of measurement, Journal of Economic Literature, 29, 471
- Kieschnick, 2003, Regression analysis of variates observed on (0,1): Percentages, proportions, and fractions, Statistical Modeling, 3, 193, 10.1191/1471082X03st053oa · DOI
- Killingsworth, 1986, Female labor supply: A survey, Vol. 1, 103
- Leung, 2004, Delinquency, schooling, and work: Time allocation decision of youth, Applied Economics, 36, 987, 10.1080/0003684042000233212 · DOI
- Milem, 2000, Faculty time allocation: A study of change over twenty years, The Journal of Higher Education, 71, 454, 10.2307/2649148 · DOI
- Papke, 1996, Econometric methods for fractional response variables with an application to 401(K) plan participation rates, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 11, 619, 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1255(199611)11:6<619::AID-JAE418>3.0.CO;2-1 · DOI
- Pencavel, 1986, Labor supply of men: A survey, Vol. 1, 3
- Singell, 1996, Will changing times change the allocation of faculty time?, Journal of Human Resources, 31, 429, 10.2307/146070 · DOI
- Thursby, M., Thursby, J., & Mukherjee, S. (2005). Are there real effects of licensing on academic research? A life cycle view. NBER Working Paper 11497. · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gender Inequality and Time Allocations Among Academic Faculty
Winslow, S. (2010) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/0891243210386728 · Cited by 201
Undoing disparities in faculty workloads: A randomized trial experiment
O’Meara, K., Jaeger, A., Misra, J., Lennartz, C., & Kuvaeva, A. (2018) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0207316 · Cited by 55
Faculty Time Expenditure Across Research, Teaching, and Service: Do Gender Differences Persist?
Allen, T. D., Miller, M. H., French, K. A., Kim, E., & Centeno, G. (2023) · Occupational Health Science · doi:10.1007/s41542-023-00156-w · Cited by 28
“For example, professors who had not been promoted to full professor after seven years reported spending more time on teaching and less time on research than did professors promoted in less than seven years (Link et al., 2008).”
BackgroundInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Link, A. N., Swann, C. A., & Bozeman, B.
- Affiliations
- University of North Carolina at Greensboro (US)
- University of Georgia (US)
- Corresponding author
- Link, Albert N.
- Venue
- Economics of Education Review
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-08
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 363-374
- ISSN
- 0272-7757 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2132705870
- Cited by
- 246
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 14.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- libres.uncg.edu
- Locations
- Economics of Education Review (publishedVersion)
- NC Digital Online Collection of Knowledge and Scholarship (The University of North Carolina at Greensboro) (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Basic Energy Sciences
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Research, Science, and Academia
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Governance and Development
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Work-Family Balance Challenges
- Keywords
- time allocation, university faculty, tenure, academic promotion, teaching, grant writing, university services, science and engineering faculty, gender differences, career paths, research universities
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
