Cited by 35Economic Growth and ProductivityFiscal Policy and Economic GrowthGender, Labor, and Family Dynamics

Population and neoclassical economic growth: A new child policy perspective

Open access
Fanti, Luciano, Gori, Luca·2009·Economics Letters

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.econlet.2009.03.014

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 4 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fanti, L., & Gori, L.
Affiliations
University of Pisa (IT)
Corresponding author
Gori, Luca
Venue
Economics Letters
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-07
Volume
104
Issue
1
Pages
27-30
ISSN
0165-1765 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1983943786
Cited by
35
References
4
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
FWCI
6.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Economics Letters (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (University of Pisa) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutial Research Information System (University of Genoa) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Growth and Productivity
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
Keywords
children's policy, population growth, neoclassical growth model, overlapping generations model, endogenous fertility, per capita income, population policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review