Cited by 179Gender, Labor, and Family DynamicsEconomic Growth and ProductivityLabor market dynamics and wage inequality

U-shaped female labor participation with economic development: Some panel data evidence

Tam, Henry·2011·Economics Letters

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.econlet.2010.11.003

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tam, H.
Affiliations
York University (CA)
Corresponding author
Tam, Henry
Venue
Economics Letters
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-02
Volume
110
Issue
2
Pages
140-142
ISSN
0165-1765 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2075533107
Cited by
179
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 3
FWCI
10.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Economics Letters (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Growth and Productivity
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
Keywords
female labor force participation, U-shaped relationship, economic development, GDP per capita, cross-national comparison, intertemporal dynamics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review