The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
What Drives Entrepreneurship in Digital Economy? Evidence from China
Abstract
Abstract Using data collected in the 2017 China Household Finance Survey (CHFS), we study the impact of mobile payment on the likelihood of household entrepreneurship. In the empirical analysis, we use two-stage least squares (2SLS) regression to address the endogeneity of mobile payment. The study finds that mobile payment significantly increases the likelihood of household entrepreneurship. The mechanism could be that the mobile payment: 1) makes users more risk seeking; 2) enriches social networks; 3) provides an additional lending channel.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
STRATEGY IN EMERGING ECONOMIES.
Hoskisson, R. E., Eden, L., Lau, C. M., & Wright, M. (2000) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/1556394 · Cited by 3,835
Cited by
Does digital financial inclusion reduce the risk of returning to poverty? Evidence from China
Xu, F., Zhang, X., & Zhou, D. (2024) · International Journal of Finance & Economics · doi:10.1002/ijfe.2812 · Cited by 39
Li, Y., Jin, R., & Li, X. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24255 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Yin, Z., Gong, X., Guo, P., & Wu, T.
- Venue
- Economic Modelling
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-11
- Volume
- 82
- Pages
- 66-73
- ISSN
- 0264-9993 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2973723578
- Cited by
- 305
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 27.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
