The DOI matches its Crossref record; 81 of the 82 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 1 are not checked yet.
A tiered approach for mapping ecosystem services
Open accessAbstract
Ecosystem services (ES) mapping make the benefits of nature spatially explicit. The different methods used for ES mapping limit the comparability of outcomes and call for a more consistent but flexible approach. We present a four step tiered approach for ES mapping supporting scholars to select the adequate combination of variables: First, the user, researcher or policy maker defines the goal of the ES assessment. Second, a meta-analysis of relevant ES mapping studies is conducted to identify key variables for mapping the selected ES. Third, the identified variables are attributed to the different levels of the multitier framework according to the level at which they best answer the policy or research question. Finally, appropriate methods for mapping the ES are selected based on the reviewed studies. We illustrate the approach for recreational services at three different tiers. Main advantages of the tiered approach are that (i) it can be adapted to other ES, (ii) it supports the efforts toward a standardized ES assessment, (iii) it provides information about relevant variables to be considered in long term monitoring at different scales, (iv) it supports sustainable resource management as it ensures the inclusion of information relevant to decision makers at different levels.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“A tiered (scaled) approach of ES mapping [182] may help to overcome the scaling problems between Integrated River Basin Management and Urban Water Management [170].”
From Urban Stream and Wetland Restoration in the Global South—A DPSIR Analysis (2019) · cites this paper as [182]
In the citing paper
“Ecosystem services (ES) are increasingly used for decision-taking in environmental management, as they promote a deeper understanding of the social-ecological system [182] and as they identify (positive) use options rather than (negative) pressure avoidance as drivers for ecosystem management [14].”
From Urban Stream and Wetland Restoration in the Global South—A DPSIR Analysis (2019) · cites this paper as [182]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis
Assessment, M. E. (2005) · Island Press · doi:10.5281/zenodo.18167309 · Cited by 10,665
de Groot, R. S., Alkemade, R., Braat, L., Hein, L., & Willemen, L. (2009) · Ecological Complexity · doi:10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006 · Cited by 3,706 · cited 1×
“…ed for ES mapping range from data availability to the integration of inter-linkages and multiple scales into the approaches (e.g. Tallis and Polasky, 2009; de Groot et al., 2010; Maes et al., 2012a, 2012b; Martinez-Harms and Balvanera, 2012;Crossman et al., 2012, 2013; Schägner et al., 2013).”
A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas
Ostrom, E. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0702288104 · Cited by 2,728 · cited 8×
“In this contribution, we present how a tiered approach based on the Ostrom (2007) framework can be adapted for ES mapping: The different tiers are de fi ned according to how the considered variables affect ES interactions, ES supply and ES demand related to a speci fi c empirical or policy question…”
InfluentialUnderstanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services
Bennett, E. M., Peterson, G., & Gordon, L. J. (2009) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01387.x · Cited by 2,630 · cited 4×
“A consistent yet fl exible approach can thus be highly bene-fi ciary when dealing with complex nested social – ecological systems, where aspects of behavior are interrelated and unpredictable and where causes are always multiple (Bennett et al., 2009).”
InfluentialNelson, E., Mendoza, G., Regetz, J., Polasky, S., Tallis, H., Cameron, D., Chan, K. M., Daily, G. C., Goldstein, J., Kareiva, P. M., et al. (2009) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1890/080023 · Cited by 2,389 · cited 2×
“Combined with scenarios about changes in environmental, societal or economic conditions, or governance structures, mapping of ES supply or values has been used to investigate the sustainability of future developments and define areas sensitive to changes (e.g. Costanza et al., 2006; Metzger et al., 2006; Grêt-Regamey…”
Science for managing ecosystem services: Beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment
Carpenter, S. R., Mooney, H. A., Agard, J., Capistrano, D., DeFries, R. S., Díaz, S., Dietz, T., Duraiappah, A. K., Oteng-Yeboah, A., Pereira, H. M., et al. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0808772106 · Cited by 2,257 · cited 2×
“ES are the products of complex interconnected social – ecological systems (Carpenter et al., 2009; Scholes et al., 2013).”
Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes
Raudsepp‐Hearne, C., Peterson, G., & Bennett, E. M. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0907284107 · Cited by 2,023 · cited 4×
“Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Land Use [5,16,23,27,34,39,42] Administrative boundaries [29,38]: national Administrative boundaries [29,38]: local Bogs, moorland [6,21,29,32,33, 35,41,43] Agriculture [4,13,21,24,29,30,32,33,34, 6,41] Coastline/lake and river shore [11,21,25,29,35,36,41,44,45,47]: European…”
InfluentialEcosystem Services in Decision Making: Time to Deliver
Salzman, J., Daily, G. C., Polasky, S., Goldstein, J., Kareiva, P., Mooney, H. A., Pejchar, L., Ricketts, T. H., & Shallenberger, R. J. (2009) · Duke Law Scholarship Repository (Duke University) · Cited by 1,990
Incorporating plant functional diversity effects in ecosystem service assessments
Díaz, S., Lavorel, S., de Bello, F., Quétier, F., Grigulis, K., & Robson, T. M. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0704716104 · Cited by 1,658 · cited 1×
“…traits have been identi fi ed as key mechanisms by which groups of species in fl uence ecosystem properties, and regression approaches using local data have been used to link community structures to ecosystem functioning (e.g. Grigulis et al., 2013; Lavorel and Grigulis, 2012; Diaz et al., 2007).”
Managing ecosystem services: what do we need to know about their ecology?
Kremen, C. (2005) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00751.x · Cited by 1,412 · cited 1×
“Most studies have described spatial co-occurrence among services or between multiple ES and biodiversity and the processes that drive ES delivery and cause trade-offs or synergies remain often unclear (e.g. Kremen, 2005; Quétier et al., 2007).”
The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Ecological and Economic Foundations
Buckley, R. (2011) · Austral Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1442-9993.2011.02253.x · Cited by 1,394
Assessing, mapping, and quantifying cultural ecosystem services at community level
Plieninger, T., Dijks, S., Oteros‐Rozas, E., & Bieling, C. (2013) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.12.013 · Cited by 1,295 · cited 2×
“, 2008; Vollmer and Grêt-Regamey, 2013) or activities and values (e.g. Raymond et al., 2009; Bryan et al., 2010; Klain and Chan, 2012; Plieninger et al., 2013; van Berkel and Verburg, 2014) in surveys and interviews.”
BackgroundConservation Planning for Ecosystem Services
Chan, K. M. A., Shaw, M. R., Cameron, D. R., Underwood, E. C., & Daily, G. C. (2006) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040379 · Cited by 1,234 · cited 3×
“Another widely used methodology relies on well-known relationships between indicators and ES including information from literature (e.g. Chan et al., 2006; Egoh et al., 2008; Naidoo et al., 2008).”
Global mapping of ecosystem services and conservation priorities
Naidoo, R., Balmford, A., Costanza, R., Fisher, B., Green, R. E., Lehner, B., Malcolm, T. R., & Ricketts, T. H. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0707823105 · Cited by 1,048 · cited 1×
“Another widely used methodology relies on well-known relationships between indicators and ES including information from literature (e.g. Chan et al., 2006; Egoh et al., 2008; Naidoo et al., 2008).”
MethodTowards an assessment of multiple ecosystem processes and services via functional traits
de Bello, F., Lavorel, S., Díaz, S., Harrington, R., Cornelissen, J. H. C., Bardgett, R. D., Berg, M. P., Cipriotti, P. A., Feld, C. K., Hering, D., et al. (2010) · Biodiversity and Conservation · doi:10.1007/s10531-010-9850-9 · Cited by 1,038 · cited 1×
“Within the last years, researchers have developed more comprehensive approaches for quantifying connections between ecological structures and processes and ES for spatial extents and time frames useful in management (Quétier et al., 2007; deBello et al., 2010).”
Mapping ecosystem services for policy support and decision making in the European Union
Maes, J., Egoh, B. N., Willemen, L., Liquete, C., Vihervaara, P., Schägner, J. P., Grizzetti, B., Drakou, E. G., Notte, A. L., Zulian, G., et al. (2012) · Ecosystem Services · doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.06.004 · Cited by 1,011 · cited 2×
“…ed for ES mapping range from data availability to the integration of inter-linkages and multiple scales into the approaches (e.g. Tallis and Polasky, 2009; de Groot et al., 2010; Maes et al., 2012a, 2012b; Martinez-Harms and Balvanera, 2012;Crossman et al., 2012, 2013; Schägner et al., 2013).”
Self-citationLandscapes' capacities to provide ecosystem services - A concept for land-cover based assessments
Burkhard, B., Kroll, F., Müller, F., & Windhorst, W. (2009) · Landscape Online · doi:10.3097/lo.200915 · Cited by 916 · cited 1×
“If experts are asked to rank an environmental variable category based on the knowledge that they have about the potential of these categories to supply an ES, the methodology corresponds to an expert knowledge approach (e.g. Burkhard et al., 2009; Kienast et al., 2009; Grêt-Regamey et al., 2012).”
The vulnerability of ecosystem services to land use change
Metzger, M. J., Rounsevell, M., Acosta, L. A., Leemans, R., & Schröter, D. (2006) · Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2005.11.025 · Cited by 770 · cited 1×
“…mapping of ES supply or values has been used to investigate the sustainability of future developments and de fi ne areas sensitive to changes (e.g. Costanza et al., 2006; Metzger et al., 2006; Grêt-Regamey et al., 2008, 2013b; Daily et al., 2009; Nelson et al., 2009; Tallis and Polasky, 2009).”
A blueprint for mapping and modelling ecosystem services
Crossman, N. D., Burkhard, B., Nedkov, S., Willemen, L., Petz, K., Palomo, I., Drakou, E. G., Martín‐López, B., McPhearson, T., Burkhard, K., et al. (2013) · Ecosystem Services · doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.02.001 · Cited by 765 · cited 4×
“…ed for ES mapping range from data availability to the integration of inter-linkages and multiple scales into the approaches (e.g. Tallis and Polasky, 2009; de Groot et al., 2010; Maes et al., 2012a, 2012b; Martinez-Harms and Balvanera, 2012;Crossman et al., 2012, 2013; Schägner et al., 2013).”
InfluentialLavorel, S., Grigulis, K., Lamarque, P., Colace, M., Garden, D. L., Girel, J., Pellet, G., & Douzet, R. (2010) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01753.x · Cited by 720 · cited 1×
“The last category covers quantitative regression model approaches (e.g. Lavorel et al., 2011).”
Natural Capital: Theory and Practice of Mapping Ecosystem Services
Kareiva, P., Tallis, H. M., Ricketts, T. H., Daily, G. C., & Polasky, S. (2011) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 704
Mapping community values for natural capital and ecosystem services
Raymond, C. M., Bryan, B. A., MacDonald, D. H., Cast, A., Strathearn, S., Grandgirard, A., & Kalivas, T. (2009) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.12.006 · Cited by 662 · cited 2×
“Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Land Use [5,16,23,27,34,39,42] Administrative boundaries [29,38]: national Administrative boundaries [29,38]: local Bogs, moorland [6,21,29,32,33, 35,41,43] Agriculture [4,13,21,24,29,30,32,33,34, 6,41] Coastline/lake and river shore [11,21,25,29,35,36,41,44,45,47]: European…”
Tallis, H. M., & Polasky, S. (2009) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04152.x · Cited by 649 · cited 5×
“While blueprints attempt to structure the approaches suggesting best practices for modeling and mapping ES (Crossman et al., 2013), a stepwise approach for practitioners, where complexity increases across tiers, is suggested for example by the IPCC (2006) tiered approach, the TEEB (2010) tiered approach, and implement…”
InfluentialMethods for mapping ecosystem service supply: a review
Martinez‐Harms, M. J., & Balvanera, P. (2012) · International Journal of Biodiversity Science Ecosystems Services & Management · doi:10.1080/21513732.2012.663792 · Cited by 644
Mapping ecosystem services for planning and management
Egoh, B. N., Reyers, B., Rouget, M., Richardson, D. M., Maître, D. C. L., & van Jaarsveld, A. S. (2008) · Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2008.03.013 · Cited by 573 · cited 1×
“Another widely used methodology relies on well-known relationships between indicators and ES including information from literature (e.g. Chan et al., 2006; Egoh et al., 2008; Naidoo et al., 2008).”
The impact of proxy-based methods on mapping the distribution of ecosystem services
Eigenbrod, F., Armsworth, P. R., Anderson, B. J., Heinemeyer, A., Gillings, S., Roy, D. B., Thomas, C. D., & Gaston, K. J. (2010) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01777.x · Cited by 545 · cited 1×
“When re fl ecting the four sources of errors in ES value mapping identi fi ed by Eigenbrod et al. (2010a,b), including (1) errors in the primary ES supply and value estimates, (2) uniformity, generalization or interpolation errors, (3) sampling or publication errors and (4) regionalization or…”
Paracchini, M. L., Zulian, G., Kopperoinen, L., Maes, J., Schägner, J. P., Termansen, M., Zandersen, M., Pérez‐Soba, M., Scholefield, P. A., & Bidoglio, G. (2014) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.04.018 · Cited by 490 · cited 3×
“, 2014) to manifold relationships considering for example the quality of a recreational site, recreational facilities and high quality views on large mountains or water bodies (e.g. Caspersen and Olafsson, 2010; Bagstad et al., 2011; Lautenbach et al., 2011; Casado-Arzuaga et al., 2013; Larondell and Haase, 2013; Kopp…”
Self-citationMapping the Economic Costs and Benefits of Conservation
Naidoo, R., & Ricketts, T. H. (2006) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040360 · Cited by 488 · cited 1×
“While several authors noted a critical need for mapping the simultaneous provision of multiple services at the landscape scale (Naidoo and Ricketts, 2006; Gimona and van der Horst, 2007), advancing the understanding of ES trade-offs and synergies is highly needed (Bennett et al., 2009; Carpenter et…”
Koschke, L., Fürst, C., Frank, S., & Makeschin, F. (2012) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.12.010 · Cited by 449 · cited 1×
“ES maps can be integrated in participative planning methods where they are used as decision support (e.g. Koschke et al., 2012; Grêt-Regamey et al., 2013c).”
MethodLavorel, S., & Grigulis, K. (2011) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01914.x · Cited by 432 · cited 1×
“…traits have been identi fi ed as key mechanisms by which groups of species in fl uence ecosystem properties, and regression approaches using local data have been used to link community structures to ecosystem functioning (e.g. Grigulis et al., 2013; Lavorel and Grigulis, 2012; Diaz et al., 2007).”
Spatial quantification and valuation of cultural ecosystem services in an agricultural landscape
Berkel, D. V., & Verburg, P. H. (2012) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.06.025 · Cited by 410 · cited 3×
“…[29,38]: national Administrative boundaries [29,38]: local Bogs, moorland [6,21,29,32,33, 35,41,43] Agriculture [4,13,21,24,29,30,32,33,34, 6,41] Coastline/lake and river shore [11,21,25,29,35,36,41,44,45,47]: European Coastline/lake and river shore [11,21,25,29,35,36,41,44,45,47]:…”
Brown, G. (2004) · Society & Natural Resources · doi:10.1080/08941920590881853 · Cited by 395 · cited 2×
“…been applied to the higher tiers 2 and 3 using participatory mapping for collecting primary data about locations of recreational sites (e.g. Brown, 2004; Beverly et al., 2008; Vollmer and Grêt-Regamey, 2013) or activities and values (e.g. Raymond et al., 2009; Bryan et al., 2010; Klain…”
The recreation opportunity spectrum : A framework for planning, management, and research
Clark, R. N., & Stankey, G. H. (1979) · Cited by 377
Grigulis, K., Lavorel, S., Krainer, U., Legay, N., Baxendale, C., Dumont, M., Kastl, E.-M., Arnoldi, C., Bardgett, R. D., Poly, F., et al. (2012) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2745.12014 · Cited by 369 · cited 1×
“…traits have been identi fi ed as key mechanisms by which groups of species in fl uence ecosystem properties, and regression approaches using local data have been used to link community structures to ecosystem functioning (e.g. Grigulis et al., 2013; Lavorel and Grigulis, 2012; Diaz et al., 2007).”
Mountain Ecosystem Services: Who Cares?
Grêt‐Regamey, A., Brunner, S. H., & Kienast, F. (2012) · Mountain Research and Development · doi:10.1659/mrd-journal-d-10-00115.s1 · Cited by 366
Self-citationMacrosystems ecology: understanding ecological patterns and processes at continental scales
Heffernan, J. B., Soranno, P. A., Angilletta, M. J., Buckley, L. B., Gruner, D. S., Keitt, T. H., Kellner, J. R., Kominoski, J. S., Rocha, A. V., Xiao, J., et al. (2014) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1890/130017 · Cited by 358 · cited 2×
“The emerging concept of macro system ecology, emphasizing the investigation of the interactions between different temporal and geographic scales integrating knowledge of different disciplines (Heffernan et al., 2014), could support our efforts in generating ES maps relevant for decision-makers.”
Larondelle, N., & Haase, D. (2013) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.12.022 · Cited by 354
Spatial covariance between biodiversity and other ecosystem service priorities
Anderson, B. J., Armsworth, P. R., Eigenbrod, F., Thomas, C. D., Gillings, S., Heinemeyer, A., Roy, D. B., & Gaston, K. J. (2009) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01666.x · Cited by 348 · cited 1×
“Methodologies of the fourth category extrapolate ES estimates of primary data such as fi eld surveys (e.g. Anderson et al., 2009; Raudsepp-Hearne et al., 2010).”
The human dimensions of urban greenways: planning for recreation and related experiences
Gobster, P. H., & Westphal, L. M. (2003) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/s0169-2046(03)00162-2 · Cited by 339
Navigating coastal values: Participatory mapping of ecosystem services for spatial planning
Klain, S. C., & Chan, K. M. A. (2012) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.07.008 · Cited by 337 · cited 1×
“…data about locations of recreational sites (e.g. Brown, 2004; Beverly et al., 2008; Vollmer and Grêt-Regamey, 2013) or activities and values (e.g. Raymond et al., 2009; Bryan et al., 2010; Klain and Chan, 2012; Plieninger et al., 2013; van Berkel and Verburg, 2014) in surveys and interviews.”
BackgroundMapping ecosystem services' values: Current practice and future prospects
Schägner, J. P., Brander, L., Maes, J., & Hartje, V. J. (2013) · Ecosystem Services · doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.02.003 · Cited by 313 · cited 6×
“As the determinants of both the supply and demand of ES are spatially variable, mapping ES values has as well gained increasing attention in current research (see Schägner et al., 2013 for a review).”
InfluentialAnalysis of historic changes in regional ecosystem service provisioning using land use data
Lautenbach, S., Kugel, C., Lausch, A., & Seppelt, R. (2010) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2010.09.007 · Cited by 311 · cited 4×
“…site, recreational facilities and high quality views on large mountains or water bodies (e.g. Caspersen and Olafsson, 2010; Bagstad et al., 2011; Lautenbach et al., 2011; Casado-Arzuaga et al., 2013; Larondell and Haase, 2013; Koppen et al., 2014; Paracchini et al., 2014) were applied at…”
InfluentialDobbs, C., Kendal, D., & Nitschke, C. R. (2014) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.02.007 · Cited by 308
Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services
Sara, M. D. R., Zulian, G., Joachim, M., & Thijssen, M. (2015) · Joint Research Centre (European Commission) · doi:10.2788/638737 · Cited by 301
Self-citationMulti-scale and cross-scale assessments of social-ecological systems and their ecosystem services
Scholes, R., Reyers, B., Biggs, R., Spierenburg, M., & Duriappah, A. (2013) · Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability · doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2013.01.004 · Cited by 271 · cited 3×
“ES are the products of complex interconnected social – ecological systems (Carpenter et al., 2009; Scholes et al., 2013).”
Targeting the management of ecosystem services based on social values: Where, what, and how?
Bryan, B. A., Raymond, C. M., Crossman, N. D., & MacDonald, D. H. (2010) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.05.002 · Cited by 268 · cited 1×
“…data about locations of recreational sites (e.g. Brown, 2004; Beverly et al., 2008; Vollmer and Grêt-Regamey, 2013) or activities and values (e.g. Raymond et al., 2009; Bryan et al., 2010; Klain and Chan, 2012; Plieninger et al., 2013; van Berkel and Verburg, 2014) in surveys and interviews.”
Kienast, F., Bolliger, J., Potschin, M., de Groot, R. S., Verburg, P. H., Heller, I., Wascher, D. M., & Haines-Young, R. H. (2009) · Environmental Management · doi:10.1007/s00267-009-9384-7 · Cited by 246 · cited 1×
“If experts are asked to rank an environmental variable category based on the knowledge that they have about the potential of these categories to supply an ES, the methodology corresponds to an expert knowledge approach (e.g. Burkhard et al., 2009; Kienast et al., 2009; Grêt-Regamey et al., 2012).”
Self-citationIndicators for mapping ecosystem services: a review
Egoh, B. N., Drakou, E. G., Dunbar, M. B., Maes, J., & Willemen, L. (2012) · Joint Research Centre (European Commission) · doi:10.2788/41823 · Cited by 237 · cited 1×
“The variables attributed to each tier are then linked through relationships identi fi ed in the literature, according to, for example, Egoh et al. (2012).”
Linking GIS-based models to value ecosystem services in an Alpine region
Grêt‐Regamey, A., Bebi, P., Bishop, I. D., & Schmid, W. A. (2007) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.05.019 · Cited by 203 · cited 1×
“If experts are asked to rank an environmental variable category based on the knowledge that they have about the potential of these categories to supply an ES, the methodology corresponds to an expert knowledge approach (e.g. Burkhard et al., 2009; Kienast et al., 2009; Grêt-Regamey et al., 2012).”
Self-citationSeppelt, R., Fath, B. D., Burkhard, B., Fisher, J. L., Grêt‐Regamey, A., Lautenbach, S., PERT, P. L., Hotes, S., Spangenberg, J. H., Verburg, P. H., et al. (2011) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.09.003 · Cited by 183 · cited 3×
“The number of research studies and reviews on ES mapping are growing exponentially (e.g. Kareiva et al., 2011; Seppelt et al., 2011; Martinez-Harms and Balvanera, 2012; Schägner et al., 2013), and efforts are taken to make the ES concept operational, for example under the umbrella of OpenNESS, OPERAs, or GreenSurge—al…”
BackgroundSelf-citationGIS-assisted mapping of landscape suitability for nearby recreation
Kienast, F., Degenhardt, B., Weilenmann, B., Wäger, Y., & Buchecker, M. (2012) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.01.015 · Cited by 174
Self-citationKandziora, M., Burkhard, B., & Müller, F. (2013) · Ecosystem Services · doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.04.001 · Cited by 167 · cited 1×
“The selection of input data can also signi fi cantly affect ES estimates, as demonstrated by Konarska et al. (2002) and Kandziora et al. (2014), which calls for a careful selection of input variables and methods to address the question at stake.”
Casado‐Arzuaga, I., Onaindia, M., Madariaga, I., & Verburg, P. H. (2013) · Landscape Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10980-013-9945-2 · Cited by 161 · cited 1×
“…boundaries [29,38]: local Bogs, moorland [6,21,29,32,33, 35,41,43] Agriculture [4,13,21,24,29,30,32,33,34, 6,41] Coastline/lake and river shore [11,21,25,29,35,36,41,44,45,47]: European Coastline/lake and river shore [11,21,25,29,35,36,41,44,45,47]: national typology and population density.”
PLANT‐TRAIT‐BASED MODELING ASSESSMENT OF ECOSYSTEM‐SERVICE SENSITIVITY TO LAND‐USE CHANGE
Quétier, F., Lavorel, S., Thuiller, W., & Davies, I. D. (2007) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/06-0750.1 · Cited by 157 · cited 2×
“Most studies have described spatial co-occurrence among services or between multiple ES and biodiversity and the processes that drive ES delivery and cause trade-offs or synergies remain often unclear (e.g. Kremen, 2005; Quétier et al., 2007).”
BackgroundThe Value of New Jersey's Ecosystem Services and Natural Capital
Costanza, R., Wilson, M., Troy, A. R., & Voinov, A. A. (2006) · PDXScholar (Portland State University) · Cited by 152
Grêt‐Regamey, A., Celio, E., Klein, T. M., & Hayek, U. W. (2012) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.10.011 · Cited by 151 · cited 4×
“ES maps can be integrated in participative planning methods where they are used as decision support (e.g. Koschke et al., 2012; Grêt-Regamey et al., 2013c).”
InfluentialSelf-citationFacing uncertainty in ecosystem services-based resource management
Grêt‐Regamey, A., Brunner, S. H., Altwegg, J., & Bebi, P. (2012) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.07.028 · Cited by 137
Self-citationMapping hotspots of multiple landscape functions: a case study on farmland afforestation in Scotland
Gimona, A., & van der Horst, D. (2007) · Landscape Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10980-007-9105-7 · Cited by 131 · cited 1×
“…several authors noted a critical need for mapping the simultaneous provision of multiple services at the landscape scale (Naidoo and Ricketts, 2006; Gimona and van der Horst, 2007), advancing the understanding of ES trade-offs and synergies is highly needed (Bennett et al., 2009; Carpenter et al.,…”
Konarska, K. M., Sutton, P. C., & Castellon, M. (2002) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/s0921-8009(02)00096-4 · Cited by 131
GIS-based Modelling of Recreational Potential of Nature-Based Tourist Destinations
Chhetri, P., & Arrowsmith, C. (2008) · Tourism Geographies · doi:10.1080/14616680802000089 · Cited by 125 · cited 1×
“…GIS-based approach were combined, for example for determining preferences through surveys and then deriving common landscape features (e.g. Kliskey, 2000; Hill and Courtney, 2004; Termansen et al., 2004; Chhetri and Arrowsmith, 2008) in quantitative regression models (e.g. Kienast et al., 2012).”
Quantifying and mapping ecosystem services
Crossman, N. D., Burkhard, B., & Nedkov, S. (2012) · International Journal of Biodiversity Science Ecosystems Services & Management · doi:10.1080/21513732.2012.695229 · Cited by 116 · cited 2×
“…ed for ES mapping range from data availability to the integration of inter-linkages and multiple scales into the approaches (e.g. Tallis and Polasky, 2009; de Groot et al., 2010; Maes et al., 2012a, 2012b; Martinez-Harms and Balvanera, 2012;Crossman et al., 2012, 2013; Schägner et al., 2013).”
Beverly, J. L., Uto, K., Wilkes, J., & Bothwell, P. (2008) · Canadian Journal of Forest Research · doi:10.1139/x07-149 · Cited by 116 · cited 2×
“…applied to the higher tiers 2 and 3 using participatory mapping for collecting primary data about locations of recreational sites (e.g. Brown, 2004; Beverly et al., 2008; Vollmer and Grêt-Regamey, 2013) or activities and values (e.g. Raymond et al., 2009; Bryan et al., 2010; Klain and Chan, 2012;…”
Kliskey, A. D. (2000) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/s0169-2046(00)00111-0 · Cited by 111 · cited 1×
“…and GIS-based approach were combined, for example for determining preferences through surveys and then deriving common landscape features (e.g. Kliskey, 2000; Hill and Courtney, 2004; Termansen et al., 2004; Chhetri and Arrowsmith, 2008) in quantitative regression models (e.g. Kienast et al.,…”
Grêt‐Regamey, A., Brunner, S. H., Altwegg, J., Christen, M., & Bebi, P. (2013) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-05800-180334 · Cited by 106
Self-citationEcosystem service state and trends at the regional to national level: A rapid assessment
Helfenstein, J., & Kienast, F. (2013) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.06.031 · Cited by 97 · cited 1×
“Finally, many ES mapping studies use different boundaries from administrative to functional (Seppelt et al., 2011; Helfenstein and Kienast, 2014).”
Self-citationError propagation associated with benefits transfer-based mapping of ecosystem services
Eigenbrod, F., Armsworth, P. R., Anderson, B. J., Heinemeyer, A., Gillings, S., Roy, D. B., Thomas, C. D., & Gaston, K. J. (2010) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2010.06.015 · Cited by 89 · cited 1×
“…used to investigate how ES values vary across space and to identify spatial areas with high or low provision and high or low demand for ES which in combination reveal areas under pressure (e.g. Chan et al., 2006; Eigenbrod et al., 2010c; Raudsepp-Hearne et al., 2010; Grêt-Regamey et al., 2013a).”
Beeco, J. A., Hallo, J. C., & Brownlee, M. T. J. (2014) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.04.002 · Cited by 84 · cited 1×
“…mapping methods were often also used to assess the number of visitors and their preferences for recreational site qualities, while GIS-based methods were more used to quantify the accessibility based on infrastructure and population density (e.g. Joyce and Sutton, 2009; Beeco et al., 2014).”
Lim, B., Brown, S., & Schlamadinger, B. (1999) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/s1462-9011(99)00031-3 · Cited by 84 · cited 1×
“For example, selection of the IPCC approaches for accounting for carbon from forest harvesting and wood products is based on understanding what information should be generated that meet the reporting requirements of the Convention (Lim et al., 1999).”
Recreational mapping and planning for enlargement of the green structure in greater Copenhagen
Caspersen, O. H., & Olafsson, A. S. (2009) · Urban forestry & urban greening · doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2009.06.007 · Cited by 83 · cited 2×
“…considering for example the quality of a recreational site, recreational facilities and high quality views on large mountains or water bodies (e.g. Caspersen and Olafsson, 2010; Bagstad et al., 2011; Lautenbach et al., 2011; Casado-Arzuaga et al., 2013; Larondell and Haase, 2013; Koppen et…”
Mapping landscape services: a case study in a multifunctional rural landscape in The Netherlands
Gulickx, M. M. C., Verburg, P. H., Stoorvogel, J. J., Kok, K. I., & Veldkamp, A. (2012) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.07.005 · Cited by 83
Koppen, G., Sang, Å. O., & Tveit, M. S. (2014) · Urban forestry & urban greening · doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2013.11.005 · Cited by 81
Vollmer, D., & Grêt‐Regamey, A. (2013) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.10.001 · Cited by 80 · cited 2×
“Category four and five of Martinez-Harms and Balvanera (2012), namely extrapolation of primary data and quantitative regression models, have especially been applied to the higher tiers 2 and 3 using participatory mapping for collecting primary data about locations of recreational sites (e.g. Brown, 2004; Beverly et al…”
MethodSelf-citationMaes, J., Braat, L. C., Jax, K., Hutchins, M. G., Furman, E., Termansen, M., Luque, S. S., Paracchini, M. L., Chauvin, C., Williams, R., et al. (2011) · NERC Open Research Archive (Natural Environment Research Council) · doi:10.2788/41581 · Cited by 79 · cited 4×
“…ed for ES mapping range from data availability to the integration of inter-linkages and multiple scales into the approaches (e.g. Tallis and Polasky, 2009; de Groot et al., 2010; Maes et al., 2012a, 2012b; Martinez-Harms and Balvanera, 2012;Crossman et al., 2012, 2013; Schägner et al., 2013).”
InfluentialSelf-citationImpacts of Farm Structural Change on Farmers' Social Ties
Jackson‐Smith, D. B., & Gillespie, G. W. (2005) · Society & Natural Resources · doi:10.1080/08941920590908042 · Cited by 64
Hayek, U. W. (2011) · Environment and Planning B Planning and Design · doi:10.1068/b36113 · Cited by 59
ESTIMAP: Ecosystem services mapping at European scale
Zulian, G., Maria-Luisa, P., Joachim, M., & Liquete, C. (2013) · Joint Research Centre (European Commission) · doi:10.2788/64713 · Cited by 56
Self-citationA method for automatic generation of the Recreation Opportunity Spectrum in New Zealand
Joyce, K. E., & Sutton, S. (2009) · Applied Geography · doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2008.11.006 · Cited by 54 · cited 1×
“…mapping methods were often also used to assess the number of visitors and their preferences for recreational site qualities, while GIS-based methods were more used to quantify the accessibility based on infrastructure and population density (e.g. Joyce and Sutton, 2009; Beeco et al., 2014).”
Recreational Site Choice Modelling Using High-Resolution Spatial Data
Termansen, M., McClean, C. J., & Skov-Petersen, H. (2004) · Environment and Planning A Economy and Space · doi:10.1068/a36164 · Cited by 50 · cited 1×
“…GIS-based approach were combined, for example for determining preferences through surveys and then deriving common landscape features (e.g. Kliskey, 2000; Hill and Courtney, 2004; Termansen et al., 2004; Chhetri and Arrowsmith, 2008) in quantitative regression models (e.g. Kienast et al., 2012).”
Linking the Wilderness Perception Mapping Concept to the Recreation Opportunity Spectrum
Kliskey, A. D. (1998) · Environmental Management · doi:10.1007/s002679900085 · Cited by 45 · cited 1×
“Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Land Use [5,16,23,27,34,39,42] Administrative boundaries [29,38]: national Administrative boundaries [29,38]: local Bogs, moorland [6,21,29,32,33, 35,41,43] Agriculture [4,13,21,24,29,30,32,33,34, 6,41] Coastline/lake and river shore [11,21,25,29,35,36,41,44,45,47]: European…”
Degenhardt, B., Frick, J., Buchecker, M., & Gutscher, H. (2011) · Leisure Sciences · doi:10.1080/01490400.2011.606780 · Cited by 31 · cited 1×
“The two maps show the supply of “ nearby recreation ” for (a) densely populated areas which – as a rule (Degenhardt et al., 2011) – has a high demand for recreation (upper middle), and (b) for less densely populated areas with a lower demand (lower middle).”
Demand analysis projections for recreational visits to countryside woodlands in Great Britain
Hill, G. W., & Courtney, P. R. (2006) · Forestry An International Journal of Forest Research · doi:10.1093/forestry/cpl005 · Cited by 30 · cited 1×
“…GIS-based approach were combined, for example for determining preferences through surveys and then deriving common landscape features (e.g. Kliskey, 2000; Hill and Courtney, 2004; Termansen et al., 2004; Chhetri and Arrowsmith, 2008) in quantitative regression models (e.g. Kienast et al., 2012).”
MethodFocus Issue: Water Resources in the Upper Indus Basin and Beyond
Karki, M., Shrestha, A. B., Hurni, H., Zimmermann, A. B., & von Dach, S. W. (2012) · Mountain Research and Development · doi:10.1659/mrd.3201 · Cited by 2
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Buchecker, 2013, Naherholung räumlich erfassen, Merbl. Prax., 51
- Capistrano, 2005, 2005, 388
- Eigenbrod, 2010, The impact of proxy-based methods on mapping the distribution of ecosystem services, J. Appl. Ecol., 47, 377, 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01777.x · DOI
- European Commission, 2011, Our life insurance, our natural capital: an EU biodiversity strategy to 2020, COM, 2011, 244
- Tallis, 2009, Mapping and valuing ecosystem services as an approach for conservation and natural-resource management, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 1162, 265, 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04152.x · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Linking soils to ecosystem services — A global review
Adhikari, K., & Hartemink, A. E. (2015) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.08.009 · Cited by 1,374
Continental-scale quantification of landscape values using social media data
Zanten, B. T. V., Berkel, D. V., Meentemeyer, R. K., Smith, J. W., Tieskens, K. F., & Verburg, P. H. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1614158113 · Cited by 306
“Despite this, we are confident in the generalizability of our results, as similar explanatory variables have been found to be important in other European mapping studies of the quantity and quality of aesthetic and/or outdoor recreation opportunities available to individuals (23, 25).”
ResultGreiner, L., Keller, A., Grêt‐Regamey, A., & Papritz, A. (2017) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.06.025 · Cited by 276
Self-citationLiu, O. Y., & Russo, A. (2021) · Sustainable Cities and Society · doi:10.1016/j.scs.2021.102772 · Cited by 225
Schirpke, U., Meisch, C., Marsoner, T., & Tappeiner, U. (2017) · Ecosystem Services · doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.11.017 · Cited by 223
Metadata
- Authors
- Grêt-Regamey, A., Weibel, B., Kienast, F., Rabe, S.-E., & Zulian, G.
- Affiliations
- ETH Zurich (CH)
- Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research (CH)
- European Commission (BE)
- Venue
- Ecosystem Services
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-06
- Volume
- 13
- Pages
- 16-27
- ISSN
- 2212-0416 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1966291929
- Cited by
- 150
- References
- 82
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 6
- FWCI
- 9.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Ecosystem Services (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DORA WSL (Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Joint Research Centre (European Commission) (submittedVersion)
- ETH Zürich Research Collection
- Funders
- Joint Research Centre
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Environmental Valuation
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Keywords
- ecosystem service mapping, tiered approach, recreational ecosystem services, long-term monitoring, sustainable resource management, multi-scale mapping
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review