Cited by 358Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesLand Use and Ecosystem ServicesEcosystem dynamics and resilience

Macrosystems ecology: understanding ecological patterns and processes at continental scales

Open access
Heffernan, James B, Soranno, Patricia A, Angilletta, Michael J, Buckley, Lauren B, Gruner, Daniel S, Keitt, Tim H, Kellner, James R, Kominoski, John S +11 more·2014·Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment

Abstract

Macrosystems ecology is the study of diverse ecological phenomena at the scale of regions to continents and their interactions with phenomena at other scales. This emerging subdiscipline addresses ecological questions and environmental problems at these broad scales. Here, we describe this new field, show how it relates to modern ecological study, and highlight opportunities that stem from taking a macrosystems perspective. We present a hierarchical framework for investigating macrosystems at any level of ecological organization and in relation to broader and finer scales. Building on well‐established theory and concepts from other subdisciplines of ecology, we identify feedbacks, linkages among distant regions, and interactions that cross scales of space and time as the most likely sources of unexpected and novel behaviors in macrosystems. We present three examples that highlight the importance of this multiscaled systems perspective for understanding the ecology of regions to continents.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1890/130017

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heffernan, J. B., Soranno, P. A., Angilletta, M. J., Buckley, L. B., Gruner, D. S., Keitt, T. H., Kellner, J. R., Kominoski, J. S., Rocha, A. V., Xiao, J., Harms, T. K., Goring, S. J., Koenig, L. E., McDowell, W. H., Powell, H., Richardson, A. D., Stow, C. A., Vargas, R., & Weathers, K. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • University of Notre Dame (US)
  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (US)
Corresponding author
Heffernan, James B
Venue
Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-02
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
5-14
ISSN
  • 1540-9295 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-9309
OpenAlex
W2138088346
Cited by
358
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 1
FWCI
33.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment (publishedVersion)
  • University of New Hampshire Scholars Repository (University of New Hampshire at Manchester) (submittedVersion)
  • DukeSpace (Duke University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Directorate for Biological Sciences
  • Division of Emerging Frontiers
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Ecosystem dynamics and resilience
Keywords
regional ecology, hierarchical framework, cross-scale interactions, feedback, regional connectivity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review