Cited by 50Urban Stormwater Management SolutionsLand Use and Ecosystem ServicesEconomic and Environmental Valuation

Including uncertainty in valuing blue and green infrastructure for stormwater management

Ashley, Richard, Gersonius, Berry, Digman, Christopher, Horton, Bruce, Smith, Brian, Shaffer, Paul·2018·Ecosystem Services

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.08.011

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Green stormwater infrastructure can increase urban green space.

    “Green stormwater infrastructure can address poor air quality, increase urban green space (with corresponding increases in residents' physical and mental health), and potentially decrease crime while addressing some societal inequity (Ashley et al. 2018;Miller and Montalto 2019;William et al. 2020).”
  • Green stormwater infrastructure can address some societal inequity.

    “Green stormwater infrastructure can address poor air quality, increase urban green space (with corresponding increases in residents' physical and mental health), and potentially decrease crime while addressing some societal inequity (Ashley et al. 2018;Miller and Montalto 2019;William et al. 2020).”
  • Increased urban green space from green stormwater infrastructure corresponds to increases in residents' physical and mental health.

    “Green stormwater infrastructure can address poor air quality, increase urban green space (with corresponding increases in residents' physical and mental health), and potentially decrease crime while addressing some societal inequity (Ashley et al. 2018;Miller and Montalto 2019;William et al. 2020).”
  • Green stormwater infrastructure can address poor air quality.

    “Green stormwater infrastructure can address poor air quality, increase urban green space (with corresponding increases in residents' physical and mental health), and potentially decrease crime while addressing some societal inequity (Ashley et al. 2018;Miller and Montalto 2019;William et al. 2020).”
  • Green stormwater infrastructure can potentially decrease crime.

    “Green stormwater infrastructure can address poor air quality, increase urban green space (with corresponding increases in residents' physical and mental health), and potentially decrease crime while addressing some societal inequity (Ashley et al. 2018;Miller and Montalto 2019;William et al. 2020).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 35 · Cited by 50

Authors
Ashley, R., Gersonius, B., Digman, C., Horton, B., Smith, B., & Shaffer, P.
Affiliations
  • IHE Delft Institute for Water Education (NL)
  • Kelda Group (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • Construction Industry Research and Information Association (GB)
Corresponding author
Ashley, Richard
Venue
Ecosystem Services
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-10
Volume
33
Pages
237-246
ISSN
2212-0416 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2889607157
Cited by
50
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1
FWCI
2.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ecosystem Services (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Stanford Woods Institute for the Environment
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Environmental Valuation
Keywords
stormwater management, sustainable urban drainage systems, ecosystem services valuation, valuation uncertainty

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review