Cited by 353Reading and Literacy DevelopmentBehavioral and Psychological StudiesEarly Childhood Education and Development

Effective programs for struggling readers: A best-evidence synthesis

Slavin, Robert E., Lake, Cynthia, Davis, Susan, Madden, Nancy A.·2011·Educational Research Review

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.edurev.2010.07.002

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • High-dosage and one-to-one tutoring was shown to be effective before the pandemic.

    “High-dosage and one-to-one tutoring was shown to be effective before the pandemic38; online tutoring variants might be effective and much less costly39 but more research is needed.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Slavin, R. E., Lake, C., Davis, S., & Madden, N. A.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Success for All Foundation (US)
Corresponding author
Slavin, Robert E.
Venue
Educational Research Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-01
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
1-26
ISSN
1747-938X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2099847255
Cited by
353
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 13
FWCI
24.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Educational Research Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
Keywords
struggling readers, reading intervention, one-on-one tutoring, small-group tutoring, phonics instruction, computer-assisted instruction, cooperative learning, reading achievement, early elementary education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review