Cited by 297Children's Rights and ParticipationYouth Development and Social SupportHigher Education Practises and Engagement

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 85 of the 87 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of student participation in decision making at school. A systematic review and synthesis of empirical research

Mager, Ursula, Nowak, Peter·2012·Educational Research Review

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.edurev.2011.11.001

Cites

85 of 85 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 87 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Mager, U., & Nowak, P.
Affiliations
Ludwig Boltzmann Institut Health Promotion Research (AT)
Venue
Educational Research Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-01
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
38-61
ISSN
1747-938X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2029182641
Cited by
297
References
87
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Educational Research Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Children's Rights and Participation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Youth Development and Social Support
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Practises and Engagement
Keywords
student participation, school decision-making, student voice, democratic skills, citizenship education, self-esteem, life skills, student-adult relationships, school ethos, academic performance, peer relationships

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review