The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Deep Learning for solar power forecasting — An approach using AutoEncoder and LSTM Neural Networks
Abstract
Power forecasting of renewable energy power plants is a very active research field, as reliable information about the future power generation allow for a safe operation of the power grid and helps to minimize the operational costs of these energy sources. Deep Learning algorithms have shown to be very powerful in forecasting tasks, such as economic time series or speech recognition. Up to now, Deep Learning algorithms have only been applied sparsely for forecasting renewable energy power plants. By using different Deep Learning and Artificial Neural Network algorithms, such as Deep Belief Networks, AutoEncoder, and LSTM, we introduce these powerful algorithms in the field of renewable energy power forecasting. In our experiments, we used combinations of these algorithms to show their forecast strength compared to a standard MLP and a physical forecasting model in the forecasting the energy output of 21 solar power plants. Our results using Deep Learning algorithms show a superior forecasting performance compared to Artificial Neural Networks as well as other reference models such as physical models.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 · Cited by 102,318
Greff, K., Srivastava, R. K., Koutnik, J., Steunebrink, B. R., & Schmidhuber, J. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2016.2582924 · Cited by 6,955
Deep Learning: Methods and Applications
Deng, L., & Yu, D. (2014) · Foundations and Trends® in Signal Processing · doi:10.1561/2000000039 · Cited by 3,480
Ensemble methods for wind and solar power forecasting—A state-of-the-art review
Ren, Y., Suganthan, P. N., & Srikanth, N. (2015) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.081 · Cited by 435
Cited by
Deep Learning for IoT Big Data and Streaming Analytics: A Survey
Mohammadi, M., Al-Fuqaha, A., Sorour, S., & Guizani, M. (2018) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2018.2844341 · Cited by 1,471
Ahmed, R., Sreeram, V., Mishra, Y., & Arif, M. D. (2020) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2020.109792 · Cited by 1,259
A survey on long short-term memory networks for time series prediction
Lindemann, B., Müller, T., Vietz, H., Jazdi, N., & Weyrich, M. (2021) · Procedia CIRP · doi:10.1016/j.procir.2021.03.088 · Cited by 720
Deep learning based forecasting of photovoltaic power generation by incorporating domain knowledge
Luo, X., Zhang, D., & Zhu, X. (2021) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2021.120240 · Cited by 312
A review and taxonomy of wind and solar energy forecasting methods based on deep learning
Alkhayat, G., & Mehmood, R. (2021) · Energy and AI · doi:10.1016/j.egyai.2021.100060 · Cited by 312
Metadata
- Authors
- Gensler, A., Henze, J., Sick, B., & Raabe, N.
- Venue
- 2016 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2016-10
- Pages
- 002858-002865
- ISSN
- 1062-922X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2587586954
- Cited by
- 614
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 22.69
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deep Learning for solar power forecasting — An approach using AutoEncoder and LSTM Neural Networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/smc.2016.7844673
- The paper
- Gensler, A., Henze, J., Sick, B., & Raabe, N. (2016). Deep Learning for solar power forecasting — An approach using AutoEncoder and LSTM Neural Networks. 2016 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC). https://doi.org/10.1109/smc.2016.7844673
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.