The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparing physisorption and chemisorption solid sorbents for use separating CO2 from flue gas using temperature swing adsorption
Open accessAbstract
We have examined the capture of carbon dioxide from flue gas by adsorption on solid sorbents using an equilibrium model for a packed bed temperature swing adsorption (TSA) process for a wide range of sorbents. This model determines the working capacity of the sorbent by looking at the difference between the equilibrium adsorbed concentrations at the adsorption and desorption conditions, and uses the sensible and latent heating requirements to determine the minimum energy usage. Using the results of this model, a class of sorbents can be constructed that have nearly identical physical properties but variable heats of adsorption for carbon dioxide to mimic different adsorption mechanisms. Parametric studies are run to determine the calculated minimum energy requirements per ton of carbon dioxide captured for this class of sorbents and a global minimum is found. This paper also discusses the effect of heat of adsorption on adsorption isotherms and what isotherm shapes are most beneficial for minimizing energy usage in carbon capture.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Advances in CO2 capture technology—The U.S. Department of Energy's Carbon Sequestration Program
Figueroa, J. D., Fout, T., Plasynski, S., McIlvried, H., & Srivastava, R. D. (2008) · International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control · doi:10.1016/s1750-5836(07)00094-1 · Cited by 2,281
Cited by
Adsorption of Carbon Dioxide for post-combustion capture: a review
Raganati, F., Miccio, F., & Ammendola, P. (2021) · Energy & Fuels · doi:10.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c01618 · Cited by 661
Younas, M., Rezakazemi, M., Daud, M., Wazir, M. B., Ahmad, S., Ullah, N., Inamuddin, & Ramakrishna, S. (2020) · Progress in Energy and Combustion Science · doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2020.100849 · Cited by 421
Chemically modified carbonaceous adsorbents for enhanced CO2 capture: A review
Kamran, U., & Park, S.-J. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125776 · Cited by 262
Pirngruber, G. D., Guillou, F., Gomez, A., & Clausse, M. (2013) · International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control · doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.01.010 · Cited by 99
Papurello, D., Gandiglio, M., Kafashan, J., & Lanzini, A. (2019) · Processes · doi:10.3390/pr7100774 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Berger, A. H., & Bhown, A. S.
- Venue
- Energy Procedia
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011
- Volume
- 4
- Pages
- 562-567
- ISSN
- 1876-6102 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2052549626
- Cited by
- 201
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.23
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparing physisorption and chemisorption solid sorbents for use separating CO2 from flue gas using temperature swing adsorption. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.01.089
- The paper
- Berger, A. H., & Bhown, A. S. (2011). Comparing physisorption and chemisorption solid sorbents for use separating CO2 from flue gas using temperature swing adsorption. Energy Procedia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.01.089
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.