Fuel oil production from municipal plastic wastes in sequential pyrolysis and catalytic reforming reactors
Open accessAbstract
The aim of this research was to study fuel oil production from municipal plastic wastes by sequential pyrolysis and catalytic reforming processes. Three kinds of municipal plastic wastes were collected from the final disposal site and the small recycling company in Yogyakarta city, Indonesia. Commercial Y-zeolite and natural zeolite catalysts were used in this study. The results show that the feedstock types strongly affect the product yields and the quality of liquid and solid products. HDPE waste produced the highest liquid fraction. The catalyst presences reduced the liquid fraction and increased the gaseous fraction. Furthermore, municipal plastic wastes pyrolysis produced higher heating value solid products than those of biomass and low rank coal.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Conventional diesel has a kinematic viscosity range between 2.0 and 5.0 cSt.
“The conventional diesel has a kinematic viscosity has a range between 2.0-5.0 cSt (Syamsiro et al., 2014).”
From Effect of advanced catalysts on tire waste pyrolysis oil (2018) · cites this paper as Syamsiro et al., 2014
The flash point of conventional diesel is higher (−55 to −60 °C) than that of tire waste pyrolysis liquid oil.
“The flash point of conventional diesel is higher (-55 to -60 °C) than pyrolysis liquid oil (Syamsiro et al., 2014).”
From Effect of advanced catalysts on tire waste pyrolysis oil (2018) · cites this paper as Syamsiro et al., 2014
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 24 · Cited by 389
- Authors
- Syamsiro, M., Saptoadi, H., Norsujianto, T., Noviasri, P., Cheng, S., Alimuddin, Z., & Yoshikawa, K.
- Affiliations
- Tokyo Institute of Technology (JP)
- Universitas Gadjah Mada (ID)
- Universiti Sains Malaysia (MY)
- Corresponding author
- Syamsiro, Mochamad
- Venue
- Energy Procedia
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014
- Volume
- 47
- Pages
- 180-188
- ISSN
- 1876-6102 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1998398667
- Cited by
- 389
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 10
- FWCI
- 32.35
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Energy Procedia (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Tokyo Tech Research Repository (Tokyo Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Japan International Cooperation Agency
- Universitas Gadjah Mada
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Municipal Solid Waste Management
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Recycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production
- Keywords
- municipal plastic waste, fuel oil production, catalytic reforming, natural zeolite catalyst, calorific value, waste-to-energy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
