Effect of Biochar Type and Rate of Application on Maize Yield Indices and Water Use Efficiency on an Ultisol in Ghana
Open accessAbstract
In an integrated approach to cut-down on inorganic fertilizer use by smallholder farmers for agricultural production through the use of biochar, a split-split plot experimental design with three replications was carried to determine the effect of biochar from three different feedstock (corn cob, rice straw and cocoa pod husk) applied at two different rates of the feedstock (2.5 t ha -l and 5 t/ha) with three application rates of Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium (N-P-K) as inorganic fertilizer (90-60-60, 45-30-30 and 0-0-0) on maize growth and yield as well as soil chemical properties. The main plots of the experimental design were allocated to the biochar types while the Sub-plot was allocated to the biochar rates. The Sub-sub-plot went for the inorganic fertilizer rates. The maize seeds were sown at spacing of 80cm between rows and 40cm between plants. Three seeds were sown per each stand which was later thinned to two plants two weeks after planting. Urea, Triple superphosphate and Muriate of Potash were used as the sources of inorganic nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium (N-P-K) respectively. The P and K were applied once two weeks after planting while the N was split applied. One third of the application rate of nitrogen was applied two weeks after planting and the remaining two thirds applied six weeks after planting. Soil samples were collected from 0-20cm depth before planting (one composite sample from the experimental site) and at harvest (from each treatment plot) to evaluate the effect of the different amendments on different soil chemical properties notable N, P, K, CEC, and pH. The quantity of biochar application had pronounced effects on maize grain yields where higher application rates (5 t/ha) showed superior performance to 2.5 t/ha.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Maize grain yields were significantly improved by biochar applied at 2.5 and 5 t ha-1 with three application rates of N, P, and K.
“For instance, maize grain yields were significantly improved by the amount of biochar applied at 2.5 t ha -1 and 5 t ha-1 with three application rates of N, P, and K (90-60-600, 45-30-30, and 0-0-0 respectively) (Yeboah et al. 2016).”
From Corn Cob and Corn Husk Biochars Enhance the Growth of Corn (Zea mays L.) in Fertilized Clay Loam Soil (2023) · cites this paper as Yeboah et al. 2016
The Methods describe biochar rates of 2.5 and 5 t/ha with three NPK rates, and the Conclusions report improved maize yield under biochar treatments. But Results §3.2 reports a significant difference between the control and 5 t/ha, not between 2.5 and 5 t/ha; it does not establish the claimed significant improvement at both rates. The citing sentence also gives 90-60-600, whereas the paper gives 90-60-60. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Jeffery, S., Verheijen, F. G. A., van der Velde, M., & Bastos, A. C. (2011) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2011.08.015 · Cited by 2,422 · see citing works
A review of biochar and its use and function in soil
Sohi, S. P., Krull, E., Lopez-Capel, E., & Bol, R. (2010) · Advances in Agronomy · doi:10.1016/s0065-2113(10)05002-9 · Cited by 2,240 · see citing works
Biochar and its effects on plant productivity and nutrient cycling: A meta-analysis
Biederman, L. A., & Harpole, W. S. (2013) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12037 · Cited by 1,737 · see citing works
Roberts, K. G., Gloy, B. A., Joseph, S., Scott, N. R., & Lehmann, J. (2010) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es902266r · Cited by 1,243 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Lehmann J, Gaunt J, Rondon M. Biochar sequestration in terrestrial ecosystems: a review. Mitig Adapt Strategy Global Change 2006; 11: 403-27.
- Kookana RS, Sarmah AK, van Zwieten L, Krull E, Singh B. Biochar Application to Soil: Agronomic and Environmental benefits and Unintended Consequences. In: Donald L Sparks (ed.): Advances in Agronomy, 2011Vol.
- Walkley A and Black, A. An examination of the Degtjareff methods for determining soil`organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci.1934; 37: 29-38.
- Sims, JT. Lime requirement. In Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 3. Chemical Methods. (D. Sparks ed.),1996; pp 491-515. Soil Science Society of America and America Society of Agronomy. SSSA Book series no. 5. Madison, Virginia, USA.
- Major J, Rondon M., Molina D, Riha., Lehmann, J. Maize yield and nutrition after 4 years of biochar application to a Colombian savanna oxisol. Plant and Soil 2010; 333:117-128
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Graduate School, U. O. T. P. L. B. C., Bulfa, A., Villegas-Pangga, G., Wagan, A., College of Agriculture, S. U. D. C., & Agricultural Systems Institute College of Agriculture and Food Sciences University of the Philippines Los Baños College, L. (2023) · The Philippine Agricultural Scientist · doi:10.62550/dc042022 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Yeboah, E., Asamoah, G., Kofi, B., & Abunyewa, A. A.
- Affiliations
- Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (GH)
- SNV Netherlands Development Organisation (NL)
- Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (GH)
- Corresponding author
- Yeboah, Edward
- Venue
- Energy Procedia
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-08
- Volume
- 93
- Pages
- 14-18
- ISSN
- 1876-6102 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2526050682
- Cited by
- 53
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 37.85
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Energy Procedia (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural Science and Fertilization
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Management and Crop Yield
- Keywords
- biochar, maize yield, water use efficiency, Ultisol, corn cob biochar, rice straw biochar, biochar application rate, chemical fertilizer substitution, soil chemical properties, cation exchange capacity, soil pH, smallholder farmers, Ghana
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review