Cited by 40Electric Vehicles and InfrastructureAdvanced Battery Technologies ResearchAdvancements in Battery Materials

Selection of Lithium-ion Battery Technologies for Electric Vehicles under China’s New Energy Vehicle Credit Regulation

Open access
Chen, Kangda, Zhao, Fuquan, Hao, Han, Liu, Zongwei·2019·Energy Procedia

Abstract

Electric vehicle, as the most promising innovative solution for energy transition, has gained high priority globally. The newly issued Chinese new energy vehicle (NEV) credit regulation is expected to have a dramatic impact on the development of Chinese and even global electric vehicle market as well as energy structure. This paper focuses on the development of Li-ion batteries for electric vehicles under the regulation and establishes a bottom-up model to compare different batteries from the perspective of credit cost-effectiveness. The results suggest that small BEVs will always have the highest credit cost-effectiveness and midsize BEVs can obtain the highest credit quickly before 2020. As for different Li-ion batteries, the LFP battery is losing superiority compared to NCM batteries, and the NCA battery is slightly inferior to NCM811 because of the technical difficulties through 2020. Under the guidance of policies, the larger the vehicle and AER, the higher nickel batteries will be applied. It’s predictable that with the rapid development of batteries, the credit cost-effectiveness will be higher and higher. Moreover, the capacity of high nickel batteries will continue to expand, which will have a great influence on the demand and price of different materials.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.egypro.2019.01.987

Cites

6 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Battery research agendas in the US, EU, and China include targets to increase the lifespan of batteries.

    “Battery research agendas in the US 58 , EU 25 , and China 60 include targets to increase the lifespan of batteries, which is why we assume that after 2020 batteries will have the same lifespan distributions as EVs and no replacement of batteries is required (Supplementary Table 16).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Liu Z. (2017). Fuquan Zhao's Insights on Automotive Industry (Vol. 1). China Machine Press: Beijng, China, 2017.
  2. Liu, Z., Liu F., Wang, Y., Hao, H., & Zhao, F. (2017). Integrated Study and Combined Policy Suggestions on CAFC, NEV and Carbon Credits [J]. Chinese Journal of Automotive Engineering, 001-009. (in Chinese)
  3. Zhao, F., Hao, H., & Liu, Z. (2016). Technology strategy to meet China's 5 L/100 km fuel consumption target for passenger vehicles in 2020. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 18(1), 7-15.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, K., Zhao, F., Hao, H., & Liu, Z.
Affiliations
Tsinghua University (CN)
Corresponding author
Liu, Zongwei
Venue
Energy Procedia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-02
Volume
158
Pages
3038-3044
ISSN
1876-6102 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2921204910
Cited by
40
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2
FWCI
7.16
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Energy Procedia (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (71690241, 71403142, 71774100)
  • Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Advanced Battery Technologies Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advancements in Battery Materials
Keywords
lithium-ion batteries, electric vehicles, battery technology selection, lithium iron phosphate batteries, NCM batteries, NCM811, battery energy density, vehicle size

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review