Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 680

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A review on underground hydrogen storage: Insight into geological sites, influencing factors and future outlook

Open access
Muhammed, Nasiru Salahu, Haq, Bashirul, Al Shehri, Dhafer, Al-Ahmed, Amir, Rahman, Mohammed Mizanur, Zaman, Ehsan·2022·Energy Reports

Abstract

Without remorse, fossil fuels have made a huge contribution to global development in all of its forms. However, the recent scientific outlooks are currently shifting as more research is targeted towards promoting a carbon-free economy in addition to the use of electric power from renewable sources. While renewable energy sources may be a solution to the anthropogenic greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from fossil fuel they are yet season-dependent faced with major atmospheric drawbacks which when combined with annually varying, but steady, energy demand, results in renewable energy excesses or deficits. Therefore, it is essential to devise a long-term storage medium to balance their intermittent demand and supply. Hydrogen (H2) as an energy vector has been suggested as a viable method of achieving the objectives of meeting the increasing global energy demand. However, successful implementation of a full-scale H2 economy requires large-scale H2 storage (as H2 is highly compressible). As such, storage of H2 in geological formations has been considered as a potential solution where it can be withdrawn again at the larger stage for utilization. Thus, in this review, we focus on the potential use of geological formations for large-scale underground hydrogen storage (UHS) where both conventional and non-conventional UHS options were examined in depth. Also, insights into some of the probable sites, and the related examined criteria for selection were highlighted. The hydrodynamics of UHS influencing factors (including solid, fluid, and solid–fluid interactions) are summarized exclusively. In addition, the economics and reaction perspectives inherent to UHS have been examined. The findings of this study show that UHS, like other storage systems, is still in its infancy. Further research and development are needed to address the significant hurdles and research gaps found, particularly in replaceable influencing parameters. As a result, this study is a valuable resource for UHS researchers.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.egyr.2021.12.002

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 680

Metadata

Authors
Muhammed, N. S., Haq, B., Al Shehri, D., Al-Ahmed, A., Rahman, M. M., & Zaman, E.
Venue
Energy Reports
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-11
Volume
8
Pages
461-499
ISSN
2352-4847 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4200344755
Cited by
680
References
7
FWCI
29.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A review on underground hydrogen storage: Insight into geological sites, influencing factors and future outlook. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.egyr.2021.12.002
The paper
Muhammed, N. S., Haq, B., Al Shehri, D., Al-Ahmed, A., Rahman, M. M., & Zaman, E. (2022). A review on underground hydrogen storage: Insight into geological sites, influencing factors and future outlook. Energy Reports. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2021.12.002

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.