The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Accuracy of thin-slice computed tomography in the detection of coronary stenoses
Open accessAbstract
AIM: Our aim was to investigate the accuracy of multislice spiral computed tomography (MSCT) in the detection of significant (>50%) coronary stenosis using a scanner equipped for 16 x 0.625 mm collimation. METHODS: In 64 patients (59 male, mean age 58 +/- 5 years) with suspected coronary artery disease, MSCT (GE Light Speed-16, collimation: 16 x 0.625 mm) was performed 20 +/- 5 days before coronary angiography (CAG). Only angiographic segments >1.5 mm were considered for analysis. RESULTS: In all patients, MSCT was carried out without complications. Three patients were excluded from the analysis. Of 729 angiographic segments, 613 (84%) were judged evaluable by MSCT. Considering only the segments judged evaluable, the sensitivity was 89%, specificity 98%, positive predictive value 90%, and negative predictive value 98%. Including all segments in the analysis (evaluable and nonevaluable), sensitivity was 78%. CONCLUSIONS: Using a scanner with a collimation of 16 x 0.625 mm, our study confirms the potential role of MSCT in the detection of significant coronary stenosis with a sensitivity of 89% and a very high specificity (98%). Exclusion criteria and less than full evaluability of the coronary arteries must still be considered limitations of the method.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography
Agatston, A. S., Janowitz, W. R., Hildner, F. J., Zusmer, N. R., Viamonte, M., & Detrano, R. (1990) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/0735-1097(90)90282-t · Cited by 7,786
Cited by
Mollet, N. R., Cademartiri, F., van Mieghem, C. A. G., Runza, G., McFadden, E. P., Baks, T., Serruys, P. W., Krestin, G. P., & de Feyter, P. J. (2005) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.105.533471 · Cited by 1,018
Accuracy of 16-Row Multidetector Computed Tomography for the Assessment of Coronary Artery Stenosis
Garcia, M. J., Lessick, J., Hoffmann, M. H. K., & CATSCAN Study Investigators, F. T. (2006) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.296.4.403 · Cited by 301
Pohle, K., Achenbach, S., MacNeill, B., Ropers, D., Ferencik, M., Moselewski, F., Hoffmann, U., Brady, T. J., Jang, I.-K., & Daniel, W. G. (2007) · Atherosclerosis · doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2006.01.013 · Cited by 289
da Luz, P. L., Bertini, P. J., & Favarato, D. (2005) · Clinics · doi:10.1590/s1807-59322005000500011 · Cited by 13
“tivities of 89% to 92% and specificities of 93% to 98% have been recently reported, after the exclusion of arteries considered to be of subdiagnostic image quality.(81,82)”
Metadata
- Authors
- MARTUSCELLI, E.
- Venue
- European Heart Journal
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-06
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1043-1048
- ISSN
- 0195-668X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2096451471
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 39.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Accuracy of thin-slice computed tomography in the detection of coronary stenoses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ehj.2004.03.024
- The paper
- MARTUSCELLI, E. (2004). Accuracy of thin-slice computed tomography in the detection of coronary stenoses. European Heart Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ehj.2004.03.024
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.