Cited by 7,786Cardiac Imaging and DiagnosticsCoronary Artery AnomaliesCoronary Interventions and Diagnostics

Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography

Open access
Agatston, Arthur S., Janowitz, Warren R., Hildner, Frank J., Zusmer, Noel R., Viamonte, Manuel, Detrano, Robert·1990·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

Ultrafast computed tomography was used to detect and quantify coronary artery calcium levels in 584 subjects (mean age 48 +/- 10 years) with (n = 109) and without (n = 475) clinical coronary artery disease. Fifty patients who underwent fluoroscopy and ultrafast computed tomography were also evaluated. Twenty contiguous 3 mm slices were obtained of the proximal coronary arteries. Total calcium scores were calculated based on the number, areas and peak Hounsfield computed tomographic numbers of the calcific lesions detected. In 88 subjects scored by two readers independently, interobserver agreement was excellent with identical total scores obtained in 70. Ultrafast computed tomography was more sensitive than fluoroscopy, detecting coronary calcium in 90% versus 52% of patients. There were significant differences (p less than 0.0001) in mean total calcium scores for those with versus those without clinical coronary artery disease by decade: 5 versus 132, age 30 to 39 years; 27 versus 291, age 40 to 49 years; 83 versus 462, age 50 to 59 years; and 187 versus 786, age 60 to 69 years. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values for clinical coronary artery disease were calculated for several total calcium scores in each decade. For age groups 40 to 49 and 50 to 59 years, a total score of 50 resulted in a sensitivity of 71% and 74% and a specificity of 91% and 70%, respectively. For age group 60 to 69 years, a total score of 300 gave a sensitivity of 74% and a specificity of 81%. The negative predictive value of a 0 score was 98%, 94% and 100% for age groups 40 to 49, 50 to 59 and 60 to 69 years, respectively. Ultrafast computed tomography is an excellent tool for detecting and quantifying coronary artery calcium.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0735-1097(90)90282-t

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Agatston score is a validated composite metric of CAC density and volume derived from non-contrast CT and is the most widely used method for CAC quantification.

    “The Agatston score, a validated composite metric of CAC density and volume derived from non-contrast CT, is the most widely used method for CAC quantification.2”

    From Prognostication and clinical opportunities with AI for coronary artery calcium: a scoping review (2026) · cites this paper as [2]

    The Abstract describes a CT calcium score based on lesion area and peak Hounsfield number, and reports interobserver agreement and associations with clinical coronary artery disease. It does not specify that the scans were non-contrast or establish that this is the most widely used CAC quantification method. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The CT coronary calcium score is a measure of the burden of coronary atherosclerosis and one of the most widely accepted measures of cardiovascular risk.

    “The CT coronary calcium score is a measure of the burden of coronary atherosclerosis and is one of the most widely accepted measures of cardiovascular risk5,6.”

    From Deep convolutional neural networks to predict cardiovascular risk from computed tomography (2021) · cites this paper as [5]

    The Abstract describes a CT calcium score that quantifies coronary calcification and reports higher scores in subjects with clinical coronary artery disease, supporting its relevance to coronary disease. It does not establish that the score measures the full burden of coronary atherosclerosis or that it is one of the most widely accepted measures of cardiovascular risk. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Coronary artery calcium is an accurate predictor of cardiovascular events.

    “Coronary artery calcium is an accurate predictor of cardiovascular events.”

    From Deep convolutional neural networks to predict cardiovascular risk from computed tomography (2021) · cites this paper as [5]

    The Abstract reports that coronary calcium scores distinguished subjects with and without clinical coronary artery disease and gives predictive values for that diagnosis. It does not report whether calcium predicts subsequent cardiovascular events, which is the outcome claimed. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The CAC score was measured manually by expert readers using the method by Agatston and Janowitz on dedicated workstations, as reported in the parent FHS, PROMISE, and ROMICAT-II studies.

    “The CAC score was measured manually by expert readers using the method by Agatston and Janowitz5,6 on dedicated workstations, as reported in the parent FHS17, PROMISE19, and ROMICAT-II20 studies.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. [1]1. Aldrich RF, Brensike JF, Battaglini JW et al: Coronary calcifications in the detection of coronary artery disease and comparison with electrocardiographic exercise testing. Circulation 1979; 59: 1113. Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
  2. [2]2. Hamby RI, Tabrah F, Wisoff BG and Hartstein ML: Coronary artery calcification: clinical implications and angiographic correlates. Am Heart J 1974; 87: 565. Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
  3. [3]3. Bartel AG, Chen JT, Peter RH, Behar VS, Kong Y and Lester RG: The significance of coronary calcification detected by fluoroscopy. Circulation 1974; 49: 1247. Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
  4. [4]4. Rifkin RD, Parisi AF and Folland E: Coronary calcification in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 1979; 44: 141. Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
  5. [5]5. Langou RA, Huang EK, Kelley MJ and Cohen LS: Predictive accuracy of coronary artery calcification and abnormal exercise test for coronary artery disease in asymptomatic men. Circulation 1980; 62: 1196. Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
  6. [6]6. Hung J, Chaitman BR, Lam J et al: Noninvasive diagnostic test choices for the evaluation of coronary artery disease in women: a multivariate comparison of cardiac fluoroscopy, exercise electrocardiography and exercise thallium myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. J Am Coll Cardiol 1984; 4: 8. Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
  7. [7]7. Detrano R, Salcedo EE, Hobbs RE and Yiannikas J: Cardiac cine fluoroscopy as an inexpensive aid in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 1986; 57: 1041. Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
  8. [8]8. Margolis JR, Chen JTT, Kong Y, Peter H, Behar VS and Kisslo JA: The diagnostic and prognostic significance of coronary artery calcification. Radiology 1980; 137: 609. Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
  9. [9]9. Detrano R, Markovic D, Simpfendorfer C et al: Digital subtraction fluoroscopy: a new method of detecting coronary calcification with improved sensitivity for the prediction of coronary disease. Circulation 1985; 71: 725. Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
  10. [10]10. Reinmuller R and Lipton MJ: Detection of coronary artery calcification by computed tomography. Dynamic Cardiovascular Imaging 1987; 1: 139. Google Scholar
  11. [11]11. Dixon WJ: BMDP Statistical Software. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press 1983. Google Scholar
  12. [12]12. Blankenhorn DH and Stern D: Calcification of the coronary arteries. Am J Roentgenol 1959; 81: 772. Google Scholar
  13. [13]13. Beadendkopf WG, Daoud AS and Love BM: Calcification of the coronary arteries and its relation to arteriosclerosis and myocardial infarction. Am J Roentgenol 1964; 92: 865. Google Scholar
  14. [14]14. Warburton RK, Tampas JP, Soule AB and Taylor HC: Coronary artery calcification: its relationship to coronary artery stenosis and myocardial infarction. Radiology 1968; 91: 109. Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
  15. [15]15. Frink RJ, Archor RWP, Brown AL, Kincaid OW and Brandenburg RO: Significance of calcification of the coronary arteries. Am J Cardiol 1970; 26: 241. Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
  16. [16]16. Tanenbaum SR, Dondos GT, Veselik KE, Prendergast MR, Brundage BH and Chomka EV: Detection of calcific deposits in coronary arteries by ultrafast computed tomography and correlation with angiography. Am J Cardiol 1989; 63: 870. Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
  17. [17]17. Sox HC, Littenberg B and Garber AM: The role of exercise testing in screening for coronary artery disease. Ann Intern Med 1989; 110: 456. Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
  18. [18]18. Detrano R and Froelicher V: A logical approach to screening for coronary artery disease. Ann Intern Med 1987; 106: 846. Crossref PubMed Google Scholar Download PDF Now Reading: Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography Share PREVIOUS ARTICLE Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of stenotic bioprosthetic aortic valves Previous NEXT ARTICLE Characterization of double potentials in human atrial flutter: Studies during transient entrainment Next

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Agatston, A. S., Janowitz, W. R., Hildner, F. J., Zusmer, N. R., Viamonte, M., & Detrano, R.
Affiliations
Mount Sinai Medical Center (US)
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1990-03
Volume
15
Issue
4
Pages
827-832
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2153785016
Cited by
7,786
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 280 · 2025: 422 · 2024: 394 · 2023: 447 · 2022: 411 · 2021: 452 · 2020: 435 · 2019: 318 · 2018: 298 · 2017: 339 · 2016: 350 · 2015: 389 · 2014: 298 · 2013: 317 · 2012: 277
FWCI
7.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Coronary Artery Anomalies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
Keywords
coronary artery calcium, ultrafast computed tomography, calcium scoring, coronary artery disease, fluoroscopy, interobserver agreement, sensitivity and specificity, coronary artery calcification
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Calcinosis, Coronary Disease, Female, Fluoroscopy, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Sensitivity and Specificity, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Observer Variation, Coronary Angiography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review