The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Long-term assessment of a novel biodegradable paclitaxel-eluting coronary polylactide stent
Abstract
AIM: The aim of this study was to assess technical feasibility, biocompatibility, and impact on coronary stenosis of a new biodegradable paclitaxel-loaded polylactide stent. Due to high rates of in-stent restenosis and permanent nature of metal stent implants, synthetic polymers have been proposed as surrogate materials for stents and local delivery systems for drugs. Paclitaxel was shown to inhibit vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation and migration. METHODS AND RESULTS: A novel biodegradable double-helical stent was manufactured using controlled expansion of saturated polymers (CESP) for the moulding of a bioresorbable poly(D,L)-lactic acid (PDLLA). A modified balloon catheter for stent deployment was developed according to the mechanical stent properties. Twelve paclitaxel-loaded (170 microg) polylactide stents, 12 unloaded polylactide stents, and 12 316L bare metal stents were deployed in porcine coronary arteries of 36 animals. Six pigs of each group were sacrificed after 3 weeks and 3 months, respectively, for every setting. Drug release kinetics as well as histomorphometrical and histopathological analyses were performed. A slow paclitaxel release kinetic for more than 2 months and therapeutic tissue concentrations were demonstrated. Coronary stenosis after implantation of paclitaxel-loaded stents (30+/-5% or 49+/-4%) was significantly inhibited compared to unloaded PDLLA stents (65+/-10%, P=0.021 or 71+/-4%, P=0.004) and metal stents (53+/-6% or 68+/-8%, P=0.029 and P=0.020) after 3 weeks or 3 months. Early complete endothelialisation was shown. Nevertheless, a local inflammatory response to the polylactide as a result of the polymer resorption process was observed. CONCLUSIONS: This novel polylactide stent showed sufficient mechanic stability, and by incorporation of paclitaxel, a significant potential to reduce restenosis development after vascular intervention was seen.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Recent advances in shape memory polymers and composites: a review
Ratna, D., & Karger-Kocsis, J. (2008) · Journal of Materials Science · doi:10.1007/s10853-007-2176-7 · Cited by 942
Yakacki, C. M., Shandas, R., Lanning, C., Rech, B., Eckstein, A., & Gall, K. (2007) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.01.030 · Cited by 618
Biodegradable Metals for Cardiovascular Stents: from Clinical Concerns to Recent Zn‐Alloys
Bowen, P. K., Shearier, E. R., Zhao, S., Guillory, R. J., Zhao, F., Goldman, J., & Drelich, J. W. (2016) · Advanced Healthcare Materials · doi:10.1002/adhm.201501019 · Cited by 544
Drug‐Eluting Bioabsorbable Magnesium Stent
DI MARIO, C., GRIFFITHS, H., GOKTEKIN, O., PEETERS, N., VERBIST, J., BOSIERS, M., DELOOSE, K., HEUBLEIN, B., ROHDE, R., KASESE, V., et al. (2004) · Journal of Interventional Cardiology · doi:10.1111/j.1540-8183.2004.04081.x · Cited by 428
Jagur‐Grodzinski, J. (2006) · Polymers for Advanced Technologies · doi:10.1002/pat.729 · Cited by 394
Metadata
- Authors
- VOGT, F.
- Venue
- European Heart Journal
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-08
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 1330-1340
- ISSN
- 0195-668X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2154503508
- Cited by
- 174
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Long-term assessment of a novel biodegradable paclitaxel-eluting coronary polylactide stent. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ehj.2004.06.010
- The paper
- VOGT, F. (2004). Long-term assessment of a novel biodegradable paclitaxel-eluting coronary polylactide stent. European Heart Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ehj.2004.06.010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.