The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A critical review of building environmental assessment tools
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Building environmental assessment methods: redefining intentions and roles
Cole, R. J. (2005) · Building Research & Information · doi:10.1080/09613210500219063 · Cited by 439
Building environmental assessment methods: applications and development trends
Crawley, D. B., & Aho, I. (1999) · Building Research & Information · doi:10.1080/096132199369417 · Cited by 321
Building environmental assessment methods: clarifying intentions
Cole, R. J. (1999) · Building Research & Information · doi:10.1080/096132199369354 · Cited by 269
Emerging trends in building environmental assessment methods
Cole, R. J. (1998) · Building Research & Information · doi:10.1080/096132198370065 · Cited by 263
Tools for environmental assessment of the built environment
Forsberg, A., & von Malmborg, F. (2004) · Building and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2003.09.004 · Cited by 236
Erlandsson, M., & Borg, M. (2003) · Building and Environment · doi:10.1016/s0360-1323(03)00031-3 · Cited by 220
The relevance of Green Building Challenge: an observer's perspective
Kohler, N. (1999) · Building Research & Information · doi:10.1080/096132199369426 · Cited by 196
Lippiatt, B. C. (1998) · doi:10.6028/nist.ir.6144 · Cited by 159
Which focus for building assessment methods – environmental performance or sustainability?
Cooper, I. (1999) · Building Research & Information · doi:10.1080/096132199369435 · Cited by 136
The environmental impact of an office building throughout its life cycle
Junnila, S. (2004) · Aaltodoc (Aalto University) · Cited by 43
Cited by
Cabeza, L. F., Rincón, L., Vilariño, V., Pérez, G., & Castell, A. (2014) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.037 · Cited by 1,455
Passer, A., Lasvaux, S., Allacker, K., De Lathauwer, D., Spirinckx, C., Wittstock, B., Kellenberger, D., Gschösser, F., Wall, J., & Wallbaum, H. (2015) · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment · doi:10.1007/s11367-015-0926-3 · Cited by 187
Developing sustainable building assessment scheme for Saudi Arabia: Delphi consultation approach
Alyami, S. H., Rezgui, Y., & Kwan, A. (2013) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2013.06.011 · Cited by 111
Zallio, M., & Clarkson, P. J. (2021) · Proceedings of the Design Society · doi:10.1017/pds.2021.491 · Cited by 19
Dahmen, J., von Bergmann, J., & Das, M. (2018) · Energy and Buildings · doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.03.012 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Haapio, A., & Viitaniemi, P.
- Venue
- Environmental Impact Assessment Review
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-10
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 469-482
- ISSN
- 0195-9255 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2042411556
- Cited by
- 699
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 43.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A critical review of building environmental assessment tools. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.eiar.2008.01.002
- The paper
- Haapio, A., & Viitaniemi, P. (2008). A critical review of building environmental assessment tools. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2008.01.002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
