The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Building environmental assessment methods: redefining intentions and roles
Abstract
The initial intentions and current emphasis of building environmental performance assessment methods are compared and contrasted with their emerging roles. This analysis provides a starting point for anticipating future developments in environmental assessment methods for buildings, how they are likely to evolve and how they will be used. The current varying expectations of assessment methods are examined, including the extent to which they can address complex issues while remaining simple and practical, their role as ‘market transformation tools', and their ability to enhance dialogue among a range of stakeholders broader than a design team. More importantly, the increasing framing of environmental issues within the wider context of ‘sustainability’ raises the question about whether existing methods are capable of being easily reconfigured to fulfil this new agenda.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A critical review of building environmental assessment tools
Haapio, A., & Viitaniemi, P. (2008) · Environmental Impact Assessment Review · doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2008.01.002 · Cited by 699
Martens, M. L., & Carvalho, M. M. (2017) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.04.004 · Cited by 459
Toward a Resource‐Efficient Built Environment: A Literature Review and Conceptual Model
Ness, D. A., & Xing, K. (2017) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/jiec.12586 · Cited by 268
Transitioning from green to regenerative design
Cole, R. J. (2012) · Building Research & Information · doi:10.1080/09613218.2011.610608 · Cited by 264
Self-citationDeveloping sustainable building assessment scheme for Saudi Arabia: Delphi consultation approach
Alyami, S. H., Rezgui, Y., & Kwan, A. (2013) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2013.06.011 · Cited by 111
Metadata
- Authors
- Cole, R. J.
- Venue
- Building Research & Information
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2005-09-01
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 455-467
- ISSN
- 0961-3218 (ISSN-L)
- 1466-4321
- OpenAlex
- W2019725033
- Cited by
- 439
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 35.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Building environmental assessment methods: redefining intentions and roles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/09613210500219063
- The paper
- Cole, R. J. (2005). Building environmental assessment methods: redefining intentions and roles. Building Research & Information. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613210500219063
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.