Cited by 277Sustainability and Climate Change GovernanceInnovation, Technology, and SocietySustainable Development and Policies

Niche construction and empowerment through socio-political work. A meta-analysis of six low-carbon technology cases

Open access
Raven, Rob, Kern, Florian, Verhees, Bram, Smith, Adrian·2016·Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eist.2015.02.002

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The MLP has brought less attention to empowerment processes that occur within niches, despite their potentially crucial influence on niche-regime empowerment processes.

    “The MLP has however brought less attention to empowerment processes that occur within niches, despite their potentially crucial influence on niche-regime empowerment processes (Raven et al. 2016).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Raven, R., Kern, F., Verhees, B., & Smith, A.
Affiliations
  • Utrecht University (NL)
  • University of Sussex (GB)
  • Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
Corresponding author
Raven, Rob
Venue
Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-03
Volume
18
Pages
164-180
ISSN
2210-4224 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2090905065
Cited by
277
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 8
FWCI
1.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions (publishedVersion)
  • Sussex Research Online (University of Sussex) (submittedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research
  • Economic and Social Research Council (ES/H022864/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Innovation, Technology, and Society
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Sustainable Development and Policies
Keywords
niche construction, empowerment, low-carbon technologies, sustainability transitions, selection environment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review