The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Passing the baton: How intermediaries advance sustainability transitions in different phases
Open accessAbstract
Recently, increasing attention has been paid to intermediaries , actors connecting multiple other actors, in transition processes. Research has highlighted that intermediary actors (e.g. innovation funders, energy agencies, NGOs, membership organisations, or internet discussion forums) operate in many levels to advance transitions. We argue that intermediation, and the need for it, varies during the course of transition. Yet, little explicit insight exists on intermediation in different transition phases. We integrate existing conceptual models on transition dynamics and phases and a typology of transition intermediaries to examine how intermediaries advance transitions in different phases. We illustrate our conceptual insights through examples from car clubs, heat pumps and low-energy housing. We conclude that intermediation is paramount from predevelopment to stabilisation of a transition. Intermediary functions change from supporting experimentation and articulation of needs in predevelopment, to the aggregation of knowledge, pooling resources, network building and stronger institutional support and capacity building in acceleration.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways
Geels, F. W., & Schot, J. (2007) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003 · Cited by 5,245
Self-citationThe multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: responses to seven criticisms
Geels, F. W. (2011) · Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions · doi:10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.002 · Cited by 3,092
The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions
Smith, A., Stirling, A., & Berkhout, F. (2005) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.07.005 · Cited by 2,238
More evolution than revolution: transition management in public policy
Rotmans, J., Kemp, R., & van Asselt, M. (2001) · Foresight · doi:10.1108/14636680110803003 · Cited by 2,100
Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation
Howells, J. (2006) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2006.03.005 · Cited by 2,053
What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability
Smith, A., & Raven, R. (2012) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.12.012 · Cited by 1,712
Sustainability Transitions Research: Transforming Science and Practice for Societal Change
Loorbach, D., Frantzeskaki, N., & Avelino, F. (2017) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-102014-021340 · Cited by 1,401
NATIONAL SYSTEMS OF INNOVATION
(2012) · The Economics of Industrial Innovation · doi:10.4324/9780203357637-26 · Cited by 1,380
Creative destruction or mere niche support? Innovation policy mixes for sustainability transitions
Kivimaa, P., & Kern, F. (2016) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2015.09.008 · Cited by 1,181
Self-citation(1998) · University of Twente Research Information · Cited by 950
Cited by
Wolf, P., Harboe, J., Sudbrack Rothbarth, C., Gaudenz, U., Arsan, L., Obrist, C., & van Leeuwen, M. (2021) · Creativity and Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/caim.12425 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Kivimaa, P., Hyysalo, S., Boon, W., Klerkx, L., Martiskainen, M., & Schot, J.
- Venue
- Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-06
- Volume
- 31
- Pages
- 110-125
- ISSN
- 2210-4224 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2911071331
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 67
- FWCI
- 13.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Passing the baton: How intermediaries advance sustainability transitions in different phases. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.001
- The paper
- Kivimaa, P., Hyysalo, S., Boon, W., Klerkx, L., Martiskainen, M., & Schot, J. (2019). Passing the baton: How intermediaries advance sustainability transitions in different phases. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.