Cited by 2,238Sustainability and Climate Change GovernanceInnovation, Technology, and SocietyInnovation Diffusion and Forecasting

The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions

Open access
Smith, Adrian, Stirling, Andy, Berkhout, Frans·2005·Research Policy

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.respol.2005.07.005

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The mitigation of the undesirable consequences of existing and emerging technologies and IS necessitates intervention in the form of sustainability transitions, moving beyond the existing multi-level perspective toward transdisciplinarity.

    “The mitigation of the undesirable consequences of existing and emerging technologies and IS necessitates intervention in the form of sustainability transitions (Loorbach, Frantzeskaki, & Avelino, 2017;Smith, Stirling, & Berkhout, 2005), moving beyond the existing multi-level perspective (Geels, 2004(Geels, , 2011) ) toward transdisciplinarity.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smith, A., Stirling, A., & Berkhout, F.
Affiliations
University of Sussex (GB)
Corresponding author
Smith, Adrian
Venue
Research Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-12
Volume
34
Issue
10
Pages
1491-1510
ISSN
0048-7333 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2144768886
Cited by
2,238
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 124 · 2025: 106 · 2024: 109 · 2023: 124 · 2022: 139 · 2021: 170 · 2020: 128 · 2019: 141 · 2018: 234 · 2017: 111 · 2016: 136 · 2015: 116 · 2014: 103 · 2013: 108 · 2012: 103
FWCI
25.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Research Policy (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Innovation, Technology, and Society
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting
Keywords
socio-technical transitions, governance, regime change, agency, power, resource allocation, expectations, sustainability transitions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review