CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 318Sustainable Finance and Green BondsSustainability and Climate Change GovernanceClimate Change Policy and Economics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 164 of the 168 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Closing the green finance gap – A systems perspective

Open access
Hafner, Sarah, Jones, Aled, Anger-Kraavi, Annela, Pohl, Jan·2020·Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions
DOI 10.1016/j.eist.2019.11.007
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eist.2019.11.007

Cites

164 of 164 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 168 references

4 of the 168 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Boie, 2014, Barriers and drivers framing the diffusion of renewable energy technologies, Renewables in the EU: Policy Performance, Drivers and Barriers. 1st DIACORE-CEPS Policy Workshop
  2. Reichelt, 2010, Green bonds: a model to mobilise private capital to fund climate change mitigation and adaptation projects, EuroMoney Environ. Finance Handb., 1
  3. Tversky, 1974, Judgement under uncertainty: heuristics and biases, science, New Series, 185, 1124

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 317

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Hafner, S., Jones, A., Anger-Kraavi, A., & Pohl, J.
Affiliations
  • Anglia Ruskin University (GB)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Hafner, Sarah
ORCID
Venue
Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-03
Volume
34
Pages
26-60
ISSN
2210-4224 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.eist.2019.11.007
OpenAlex
W2990695454
Cited by
318
References
168
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 76 · 2023: 69 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 14
FWCI
27.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions (publishedVersion)
  • Anglia Ruskin Research Online (Anglia Ruskin University) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Center for Urban Science and Progress
  • Economic and Social Research Council (ES/M010163/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
Keywords
energy decarbonization, investment barriers, policy uncertainty, short-termism, path dependence, lock-in, nonlinearity, systems theory, climate policy, UK energy sector

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review