Cited by 131Agronomic Practices and Intercropping SystemsSustainable Agricultural Systems AnalysisAgricultural Science and Fertilization

ROTOR, a tool for generating and evaluating crop rotations for organic farming systems

Bachinger, Johann, Zander, Peter·2007·European Journal of Agronomy

Abstract

As with conventional farming, the improvement of organic farming systems requires agronomic planning tools to enhance economic performance. Crop rotation planning plays a crucial role in organic arable farming systems due to the renunciation of mineral nitrogen fertilisers and pesticides. Our objective was to develop a tool for generating and evaluating site-specific and agronomically sustainable crop rotations for organic farming systems in central Europe. The resulting static rule-based model, called ROTOR, consists of two basic steps: (A) A set of annual crop production activities (CPAs) is assembled semi-automatically from single site and crop-specific field operations using a relational data base. The database includes all relevant crops recorded separately with inputs and outputs, machinery and timing. Starting from stubble tillage and ending with the last harvest measure, the CPAs describe the current best cropping practices. Different CPAs are included for each crop according to (i) the type of crop preceding and (ii) the field operations following: whether ploughing or non-inverting tillage, undersowing crops, using catch crops, manuring, straw harvesting, or mechanical weed control. The former allows for the modelling of all possible positions of a crop within a crop rotation and the consequential effects of preceding crops. The CPAs are evaluated using rule-based assessment modules for yield, economic performance, N balance, nitrate leaching, and weed infestation risks. These modules have been developed using data from field experiments, farm trials and surveys, expert knowledge and a soil-crop simulation model. (B) Within the crop generation module, all possible sequences of CPAs are linked to 3-8-year preliminary crop rotations. Agronomically sustainable crop rotations are selected according to exclusion criteria (i.e., thresholds for N balance, weed infestation risks, phytosanitary and chronological restrictions) and ranked, e.g. by economic performance. The model was tested by comparing (i) estimated with observed yields and (ii) generated with existing rotations. These comparisons, based on data obtained from two farm surveys from North Eastern Germany, indicate the validity and usability of the model approach. ROTOR was found to support the complex crop rotation planning in organic farming systems requiring rotations with overlapping undersown main and cover crops. ROTOR is able to reduce the risk of planning failures by offering a quantitative method of optimisation of weed and site-specific N management.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eja.2006.09.002

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In agriculture, most existing design methods and tools provide resources to organise horizontal transformations, either at the level of cropping systems, farming systems, or territories.

    “However, in agriculture, most existing design methods and tools provide resources to organise horizontal transformations, either at the level of cropping systems (Bachinger and Zander 2007), farming systems (Le Gal etal. 2010), or territories (Petit etal. 2021).”

    From Designing agroecological systems across scales: a new analytical framework (2022) · cites this paper as Bachinger and Zander 2007

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bachinger, J., & Zander, P.
Affiliations
Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (DE)
Corresponding author
Bachinger, Johann
Venue
European Journal of Agronomy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-02
Volume
26
Issue
2
Pages
130-143
ISSN
1161-0301 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2011900931
Cited by
131
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
9.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
European Journal of Agronomy (publishedVersion)
Funders
Bundesministerium für Ernährung und Landwirtschaft
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural Science and Fertilization
Keywords
crop rotation planning, organic farming, rotor, rule-based models, nitrogen balance, nitrate leaching, catch crops, economic performance, nitrogen management, Central Europe

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review