Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 273

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The effects of two organic manures on soil properties and crop yields on a temperate calcareous soil under a wheat–maize cropping system

Open access
Zhao, Yunchen, Wang, Ping, Li, Jianlong, Chen, Yuru, Ying, Xianzhi, Liu, Shuying·2009·European Journal of Agronomy

Abstract

To improve soil fertility, efforts need to be made to increase soil organic matter content. Straw manure is considered another important management practice to maintain soil organic matter content. This study compared effects of two organic manures (straw and farmyard manure) on soil properties and crop yields in a crop rotation system under semi-arid conditions. Soil physical, chemical and biological characteristics were determined in the experiment. After 25 years cropping and fertilization, two organic manures significantly influenced soil properties and crop yields. Farmyard manure combined with chemical fertilizer management (M + NP) resulted in higher increase in SOC, available-N, available-P, and higher activities of protease, urease, and alkaline-phosphatase compared with those found under straw manure combined with chemical fertilizer management (S + NP). However, soil of straw treatment had higher levels of potential soil respiration, soil water retention, microbial biomass, soil porosity, invertase, catalase and lower bulk density than farmyard manure treatment. M + NP produced the highest crop yields at all treatments. Biochemical properties of both treatments were positively correlated with SOC and nutrient content. These results indicate that straw management positively affected soil physical, chemical and biochemical properties as manure treatment in calcareous soil. Adding straw manure, as a replacement of farmyard manure, could be a promising strategy on some soil physical and biological properties as compared to farmyard manure in calcareous soil.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eja.2009.03.001

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 39 references

Cited by

See all 273

Metadata

Authors
Zhao, Y., Wang, P., Li, J., Chen, Y., Ying, X., & Liu, S.
Venue
European Journal of Agronomy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-07
Volume
31
Issue
1
Pages
36-42
ISSN
1161-0301 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2081720132
Cited by
273
References
39
FWCI
14.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The effects of two organic manures on soil properties and crop yields on a temperate calcareous soil under a wheat–maize cropping system. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.eja.2009.03.001
The paper
Zhao, Y., Wang, P., Li, J., Chen, Y., Ying, X., & Liu, S. (2009). The effects of two organic manures on soil properties and crop yields on a temperate calcareous soil under a wheat–maize cropping system. European Journal of Agronomy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2009.03.001

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.