Cited by 47Soil Management and Crop YieldSoil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsAgricultural Science and Fertilization

Decreased foliar nitrogen and crop yield in organic rainfed almond trees during transition from reduced tillage to no-tillage in a dryland farming system

Open access
Martínez-Mena, María, Garcia-Franco, Noelia, Almagro, María, Ruiz-Navarro, Antonio, Albaladejo, Juan, de Aguilar, Javier Melgares, Gonzalez, David, Querejeta, Jose Ignacio·2013·European Journal of Agronomy

Abstract

Sustainable farming practices can be beneficial or detrimental to crop production in the short-term, which will strongly determine their appeal to farmers. We evaluated the effects of several sustainable practices on soil properties, plant nutrition and ecophysiology and crop yield in a semiarid agroecosystem. A three-year randomised experiment was conducted in a rainfed almond grove where the initial soil management was reduced tillage. Two alternative treatments were evaluated: reduced tillage plus green manure and no-tillage. The following soil and plant parameters were measured once per year: soil organic carbon, total nitrogen and Polsen; foliar N, P, δ13C and δ15N and crop yield. We found that soil bulk density increased significantly with no-tillage. Leaf δ15N was positively associated with soil fertility, foliar nutrient concentrations and crop yield across treatments. Leaf δ13C, Nfoliar and crop yield were strongly positively associated across treatments in every year of the study. Reduced tillage treatments displayed higher leaf δ15N, δ13C, Nfoliar and crop yield than the no-tillage treatment, indicating a sharp decrease in the leaf nitrogen status and intrinsic water use efficiency of almond trees during the transition from reduced tillage to no-tillage. In semiarid agroecosystems where soils are prone to compaction, some tillage is required to maintain optimal crop production in rainfed almonds.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eja.2013.04.006

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous studies in Mediterranean European almond plantations found larger yield gaps for NT (-63% and -28%) over 10-12 years compared to our short-term study.

    “previous studies in Mediterranean European almond plantations showed contrasting results to what Giller et al. (2009) suggest, as they found over a longer time scale (10-12 years) larger yield gaps for NT (-63% and -28%) compared to our short-term study”

    From Almond farm profitability under agroecological management in south-eastern Spain: Accounting for externalities and opportunity costs (2020) · cites this paper as Martínez-Mena et al., 2013

    Section 3.3 reports lower almond yields under no-tillage: cumulative production over three years was twice as high under reduced tillage. The paper’s Discussion identifies its study period as three years, not 10–12, and the cited passages do not report yield gaps of −63% or −28%. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Burke, W., Gabriels, D., Bouma, J., 1986. Bulk density. In: Klute A (Ed) Methods of Soil Analysis. Part I. Am. Soc. Agron, Madison,WI, pp. 363-376.
  2. Katerji, N., Mastrorilli, M., Rana, G. 2008. Water use efficiency of crops cultivated in the Mediterranean region: Review and analysis. Europ. J. Agronomy 28, 493-507.
  3. Power, J.F., 1990. Use of green manures in the Great Plains. In: Havlin JL, Jacobsen JS (Eds.), Proceedings of the Great Plains Soil Fertility Conference, Denver, CO. 6-7 March. Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, pp. 1-18.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Martínez-Mena, M., Garcia-Franco, N., Almagro, M., Ruiz-Navarro, A., Albaladejo, J., de Aguilar, J. M., Gonzalez, D., & Querejeta, J. I.
Affiliations
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES)
Venue
European Journal of Agronomy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-08
Volume
49
Pages
149-157
ISSN
1161-0301 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1993216205
Cited by
47
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2
FWCI
5.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • European Journal of Agronomy (publishedVersion)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Management and Crop Yield
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural Science and Fertilization
Keywords
almond, no-tillage, reduced tillage, leaf nitrogen content, leaf nitrogen isotopes, leaf carbon isotopes, crop yield, soil organic carbon, soil nitrogen, green manure, soil bulk density, soil compaction, water use efficiency, rainfed agriculture, semi-arid agroecosystems, sustainable agriculture

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review