The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluation of regional estimates of winter wheat yield by assimilating three remotely sensed reflectance datasets into the coupled WOFOST–PROSAIL model
Open accessAbstract
Abstract To estimate regional-scale winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) yield, we developed a data-assimilation scheme that assimilates remotely sensed reflectance into a coupled crop growth–radiative transfer model. We generated a time series of 8-day, 30-m-resolution synthetic Kalman Smoothed reflectance by combining MODIS surface reflectance products with Landsat surface reflectance using a KS algorithm. We evaluated the assimilation performance using datasets with different spatial and temporal scales (e.g., three dates for the 30-m Landsat reflectance, 8-day and 1-km MODIS surface reflectance, and 8-day and 30-m synthetic KS reflectance) into the coupled WOFOST–PROSAIL model. Then we constructed a four-dimensional variational data assimilation (4DVar) cost function to account for differences between the observed and simulated reflectance. We used the shuffled complex evolution–University of Arizona (SCE-UA) algorithm to minimize the 4DVar cost function and optimize important input parameters of the coupled model. The optimized parameters were used to drive WOFOST and estimate county-level winter wheat yield in a region of China. By assimilating the synthetic KS reflectance data, we achieved the most accurate yield estimates (R2 = 0.44, 0.39, and 0.30; RMSE = 598, 1288, and 595 kg/ha for 2009, 2013, and 2014, respectively), followed by Landsat reflectance (R2 = 0.21, 0.22, and 0.33; RMSE = 915, 1422, and 637 kg/ha for 2009, 2013, and 2014, respectively) and MODIS reflectance (R2 = 0.49, 0.05, and 0.22; RMSE = 1136, 1468, and 700 kg/ha for 2009, 2013, and 2014, respectively) at the county level. Thus, our method improves the reliability of regional-scale crop yield estimates.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A New Approach to Linear Filtering and Prediction Problems
Kalman, R. E. (1960) · Journal of Basic Engineering · doi:10.1115/1.3662552 · Cited by 31,751
An Introduction to the Kalman Filter
Welch, G., & Bishop, G. (1995) · CiteSeer X (The Pennsylvania State University) · Cited by 4,895
PROSPECT: A model of leaf optical properties spectra
Jacquemoud, S., & Baret, F. (1990) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/0034-4257(90)90100-z · Cited by 2,400
Light scattering by leaf layers with application to canopy reflectance modeling: The SAIL model
Verhoef, W. (1984) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/0034-4257(84)90057-9 · Cited by 2,028
Gao, F., Masek, J., Schwaller, M., & Hall, F. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2006.872081 · Cited by 1,968
Optimal use of the SCE-UA global optimization method for calibrating watershed models
Duan, Q., Sorooshian, S., & Gupta, V. K. (1994) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/0022-1694(94)90057-4 · Cited by 1,508
An enhanced spatial and temporal adaptive reflectance fusion model for complex heterogeneous regions
Zhu, X., Chen, J., Gao, F., Chen, X., & Masek, J. G. (2010) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2010.05.032 · Cited by 1,317
A Convergence Theorem for the Fuzzy ISODATA Clustering Algorithms
Bezdek, J. C. (1980) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.1980.4766964 · Cited by 980
Knyazikhin, Y., Martonchik, J. V., Myneni, R. B., Diner, D. J., & Running, S. W. (1998) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/98jd02462 · Cited by 932
WOFOST: a simulation model of crop production
van Diepen, C. A., Wolf, J., van Keulen, H., & Rappoldt, C. (1989) · Soil Use and Management · doi:10.1111/j.1475-2743.1989.tb00755.x · Cited by 779
Cited by
The role of artificial intelligence in advancing food safety: A strategic path to zero contamination
Naseem, S., & Rizwan, M. (2025) · Food Control · doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2025.111292 · Cited by 88
Metadata
- Authors
- Huang, J., Ma, H., Sedano, F., Lewis, P., Liang, S., Wu, Q., Su, W., Zhang, X., & Zhu, D.
- Venue
- European Journal of Agronomy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-01
- Volume
- 102
- Pages
- 1-13
- ISSN
- 1161-0301 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2900420505
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 36
- FWCI
- 11.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of regional estimates of winter wheat yield by assimilating three remotely sensed reflectance datasets into the coupled WOFOST–PROSAIL model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.eja.2018.10.008
- The paper
- Huang, J., Ma, H., Sedano, F., Lewis, P., Liang, S., Wu, Q., Su, W., Zhang, X., & Zhu, D. (2019). Evaluation of regional estimates of winter wheat yield by assimilating three remotely sensed reflectance datasets into the coupled WOFOST–PROSAIL model. European Journal of Agronomy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2018.10.008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.