Contrasting effects of slurry and mineral fertilizer on N2-fixation in grass-clover mixtures
Open accessAbstract
In dairy systems, grass–clover swards are fertilized with on–farm cattle slurry as a basic dressing and often supplemented with mineral fertilizer throughout the season. Uncertainty remains on consequences for N input from atmospheric N2-fixation by grassland legumes. The aim of this study was to examine the N response of slurry versus mineral N fertilization on clover dynamics, the proportion of N derived from the atmosphere (%Ndfa) and the quantitative N2-fixation (qBNF) using the 15N isotope dilution method. This was done in an on farm setting at two sites in two years with increasing rates of N fertilizer (0–480 kg available N ha-1) either of mineral N only or combined with application of cattle slurry. The leys were at one site composed a 2–species mixture of white clover (Trifolium repens L.) and ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) and at the other site of a 4–species mixture of white clover, red clover (Trifolium pretense L.), festulolium (Festulolium braunii) and ryegrass. Species dynamics were significantly affected by fertilizer rate in the 2–species sward and by fertilizer rate and type in the 4–species sward. Reduction of the clover proportion in response to fertilization was due to a clover yield decrease (2–species sward) or a grass yield increase (4–species sward). In the 4–species sward, in treatments with mineral N only %Ndfa decreased markedly with N rate, whereas the corresponding slurry + mineral N treatments did not. Thus, apart from fertilization with mineral N only at one site the general picture was a relatively high (>80%) %Ndfa over the season when the N level was below 200–300 kg available N ha-1. The qBNF of the harvested biomass in sward without fertilization reached 193–216 kg N ha-1 in the 2–species sward and 203–286 kg N ha-1 in the 4–species sward. Clover persisted at high fertilization rates, but qBNF was reduced to 16–79 kg N ha-1 and 58–163 kg N ha-1 in 2– and 4–species swards, respectively. Interestingly, in the 4–species sward amended with slurry + mineral N, qBNF was high and independent of fertilization rate. We conclude that response of clover dynamics to N fertilization differed with fertilizer type and level – slurry have lower effect whereas the effect of mineral N only on N2-fixation is less predictable.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Nitrogen application to grass-clover leys generally results in an overall productivity advantage, although partly at the cost of clover.
“although herbage yield responses to N application vary between years and sites it is generally found that N application results in an overall productivity advantage, albeit partly at the cost of clover (Nyfeler et al. 2009;Kristensen et al. 2022).”
From Cover crops and optimal N management reduce nitrate leaching to background levels in grass-clover–barley rotations on sandy soil (2026) · cites this paper as Kristensen et al. 2022
In the unfertilized grass-clover, 60% of total herbage DM was clover.
“However, in the unfertilized grass-clover 60% of total herbage DM was clover (Kristensen et al. 2022)”
From Cover crops and optimal N management reduce nitrate leaching to background levels in grass-clover–barley rotations on sandy soil (2026) · cites this paper as Kristensen et al. 2022
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mortensen, E. Ø., Abalos, D., & Rasmussen, J. (2025) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2025.109578 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Self-citationThers, H., Jensen, J. L., Rasmussen, J., & Eriksen, J. (2024) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2023.109233 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Self-citationEriksen, J., Jensen, J. L., Larsen, S. U., Thers, H., & Vogeler, I. (2026) · Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems · doi:10.1007/s10705-026-10479-z
“Kristensen et al. (2022) have previously reported the experimental findings concerning the ley phase for yield and N 2 fixation, while Fontaine et al. (2024) reported those regarding N balances and nitrate leaching.”
Self-citation
- Authors
- Kristensen, R. K., Fontaine, D., Rasmussen, J., & Eriksen, J.
- Affiliations
- Aarhus University (DK)
- Corresponding author
- Fontaine, Doline
- Venue
- European Journal of Agronomy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-02
- Volume
- 133
- Pages
- 126431
- ISSN
- 1161-0301 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3214830172
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3
- FWCI
- 3.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- European Journal of Agronomy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Innovation Fund
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Pasture and Agricultural Systems
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis
- Keywords
- nitrogen fixation, cattle slurry, mineral nitrogen fertilizer, grass-clover mixtures, white clover, red clover, ryegrass, nitrogen derived from atmosphere, 15N isotope dilution, nitrogen use efficiency, legume persistence, 15N tracer
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review