The DOI matches its Crossref record; 103 of the 103 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: Recommendations from the EUSOMA working group
Open accessAbstract
The use of breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is rapidly increasing. EUSOMA organised a workshop in Milan on 20-21st October 2008 to evaluate the evidence currently available on clinical value and indications for breast MRI. Twenty-three experts from the disciplines involved in breast disease management - including epidemiologists, geneticists, oncologists, radiologists, radiation oncologists, and surgeons - discussed the evidence for the use of this technology in plenary and focused sessions. This paper presents the consensus reached by this working group. General recommendations, technical requirements, methodology, and interpretation were firstly considered. For the following ten indications, an overview of the evidence, a list of recommendations, and a number of research issues were defined: staging before treatment planning; screening of high-risk women; evaluation of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy; patients with breast augmentation or reconstruction; occult primary breast cancer; breast cancer recurrence; nipple discharge; characterisation of equivocal findings at conventional imaging; inflammatory breast cancer; and male breast. The working group strongly suggests that all breast cancer specialists cooperate for an optimal clinical use of this emerging technology and for future research, focusing on patient outcome as primary end-point.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
New Guidelines to Evaluate the Response to Treatment in Solid Tumors
Therasse, P., Arbuck, S. G., Eisenhauer, E. A., Wanders, J., Kaplan, R. S., Rubinstein, L., Verweij, J., Van Glabbeke, M., van Oosterom, A. T., Christian, M. C., et al. (2000) · JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/92.3.205 · Cited by 15,660
Cancer Incidence in Five Continents
(1970) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-85851-2 · Cited by 8,501
(2005) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(05)67887-7 · Cited by 5,127 · cited 2×
“15-year overall mortality’.(61) However, so far, no clear evidence exists proving that preoperative MRI is beneficial for the final outcome.”
Veronesi, U., Cascinelli, N., Mariani, L., Greco, M., Saccozzi, R., Luini, A., Aguilar, M., & Marubini, E. (2002) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa020989 · Cited by 4,450
American Cancer Society Guidelines for Breast Screening with MRI as an Adjunct to Mammography
Saslow, D., Boetes, C., Burke, W., Harms, S., Leach, M. O., Lehman, C. D., Morris, E., Pisano, E., Schnall, M., Sener, S., et al. (2007) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/canjclin.57.2.75 · Cited by 2,637
Self-citationKriege, M., Brekelmans, C. T. M., Boetes, C., Besnard, P. E., Zonderland, H. M., Obdeijn, I. M., Manoliu, R. A., Kok, T., Peterse, H., Tilanus-Linthorst, M. M. A., et al. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa031759 · Cited by 1,687
Self-citationBerg, W. A., Gutierrez, L., NessAiver, M. S., Carter, W. B., Bhargavan, M., Lewis, R. S., & Ioffe, O. B. (2004) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2333031484 · Cited by 1,439
Wolmark, N., Wang, J., Mamounas, E., Bryant, J., & Fisher, B. (2001) · JNCI Monographs · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jncimonographs.a003469 · Cited by 1,299
Neoadjuvant Versus Adjuvant Systemic Treatment in Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
Mauri, D., Pavlidis, N., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/dji021 · Cited by 1,200
Cited by
Harbeck, N., Penault-Llorca, F., Cortes, J., Gnant, M., Houssami, N., Poortmans, P., Ruddy, K., Tsang, J., & Cardoso, F. (2019) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/s41572-019-0111-2 · Cited by 3,024
Early breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up
Cardoso, F., Kyriakides, S., Ohno, S., Penault-Llorca, F., Poortmans, P., Rubio, I. T., Zackrisson, S., & Senkus, E. (2019) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdz173 · Cited by 2,214
Mann, R. M., Cho, N., & Moy, L. (2019) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2019182947 · Cited by 917
Breast cancer diagnosis: Imaging techniques and biochemical markers
Jafari, S. H., Saadatpour, Z., Salmaninejad, A., Momeni, F., Mokhtari, M., Nahand, J. S., Rahmati, M., Mirzaei, H., & Kianmehr, M. (2018) · Journal of Cellular Physiology · doi:10.1002/jcp.26379 · Cited by 410
Marinovich, M. L., Houssami, N., Macaskill, P., Sardanelli, F., Irwig, L., Mamounas, E. P., von Minckwitz, G., Brennan, M. E., & Ciatto, S. (2013) · JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djs528 · Cited by 382
Self-citationGlobal guidelines for breast cancer screening: A systematic review
Ren, W., Chen, M., Qiao, Y., & Zhao, F. (2022) · The Breast · doi:10.1016/j.breast.2022.04.003 · Cited by 325
Truhn, D., Schrading, S., Haarburger, C., Schneider, H., Merhof, D., & Kuhl, C. (2019) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2018181352 · Cited by 273
Houssami, N., Turner, R. M., & Morrow, M. (2017) · Breast Cancer Research and Treatment · doi:10.1007/s10549-017-4324-3 · Cited by 243
The frequency of missed breast cancers in women participating in a high-risk MRI screening program
Vreemann, S., Gubern-Merida, A., Lardenoije, S., Bult, P., Karssemeijer, N., Pinker, K., & Mann, R. M. (2018) · Breast Cancer Research and Treatment · doi:10.1007/s10549-018-4688-z · Cited by 37
Metadata
- Authors
- Sardanelli, F., Boetes, C., Borisch, B., Decker, T., Federico, M., Gilbert, F. J., Helbich, T., Heywang-Köbrunner, S. H., Kaiser, W. A., Kerin, M. J., Mansel, R. E., Marotti, L., Martincich, L., Mauriac, L., Meijers-Heijboer, H., Orecchia, R., Panizza, P., Ponti, A., Purushotham, A. D., Regitnig, P., Del Turco, M. R., Thibault, F., & Wilson, R.
- Venue
- European Journal of Cancer
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-05
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1296-1316
- ISSN
- 0959-8049 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2160374037
- Cited by
- 992
- References
- 103
- FWCI
- 44.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
