Cited by 40Cervical Cancer and HPV ResearchHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeWomen's cancer prevention and management

Cost-effectiveness of primary HPV screening for cervical cancer in Germany—a decision analysis

Sroczynski, G., Schnell-Inderst, P., Mühlberger, N., Lang, K., Aidelsburger, P., Wasem, J., Mittendorf, T., Engel, J. +4 more·2011·European Journal of Cancer

Abstract

Objectives To systematically evaluate the long-term effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of HPV-based primary cervical cancer screening in the German health care context using a decision-analysis approach. Methods A Markov-model for HPV-infection and cervical cancer was developed for the German health care context, and applied to evaluate various screening strategies that differ by screening interval and test algorithms, including HPV-testing alone or in combination with cytology. German clinical, epidemiological, and economic data, and test accuracy data from international meta-analyses were used. Outcomes predicted included the reduction in cervical cancer cases and deaths, life expectancy and discounted incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER). The analysis was performed from the perspective of the healthcare system adopting a 3% annual discount rate for costs and outcomes. Extensive sensitivity analyses were performed. Results HPV-based screening is more effective than cytology alone. It results in a 71-97% reduction in cervical cancer cases as compared to 53-93% for cytology alone. The ICER range from 2600 Euro/LYG (cytology, 5-year-interval) to 155,500 Euro/LYG (annual HPV-testing starting at age 30 years, cytology age 20-29 years). Annual cytology alone, the current recommended screening strategy in Germany, is dominated by HPV-strategies. Increasing the age at screening initiation from 20 to 25 years does not result in a relevant loss in effectiveness but results…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.03.006

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Markov model was based on previously published and validated models for cervical cancer.

    “Based on the previously published and validated models for cervical cancer, we developed a markov model on MS Excel spread sheet, considering the natural history of HPV infection and cervical cancer (Fig 1). [12–15]”
  • These estimates have also been used to parameterize models to evaluate cervical cancer prevention strategies in Thailand, United Kingdom and Germany.

    “These estimates have also been used to parameterize models to evaluate cervical cancer prevention strategies in Thailand, United Kingdom and Germany. [13–15]”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sroczynski, G., Schnell-Inderst, P., Mühlberger, N., Lang, K., Aidelsburger, P., Wasem, J., Mittendorf, T., Engel, J., Hillemanns, P., Petry, K. U., Krämer, A., & Siebert, U.
Affiliations
  • UMIT TIROL - Private University for Health Sciences and Health Technology (AT)
  • University of Duisburg-Essen (DE)
  • Leibniz University Hannover (DE)
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
  • Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (DE)
  • Bielefeld University (DE)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Siebert, U.
Venue
European Journal of Cancer
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-07
Volume
47
Issue
11
Pages
1633-1646
ISSN
0959-8049 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2124327706
Cited by
40
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PUB – Publications at Bielefeld University (Bielefeld University) (submittedVersion)
  • Publikationen an der Universität Bielefeld (Universität Bielefeld) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
Keywords
HPV-based cervical cancer screening, cost-effectiveness, cervical cancer, HPV testing, cytology, screening frequency, age at screening initiation, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, Markov model, Germany
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Decision Support Techniques, Female, Humans, Markov Chains, Mass Screening, Medical Oncology, Middle Aged, Sensitivity and Specificity, Prevalence, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Early Detection of Cancer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review