Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 452

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer consensus recommendations for the treatment of mycosis fungoides/Sézary syndrome – Update 2017

Open access
Trautinger, Franz, Eder, Johanna, Assaf, Chalid, Bagot, Martine, Cozzio, Antonio, Dummer, Reinhard, Gniadecki, Robert, Klemke, Claus-Detlev, Ortiz-Romero, Pablo L., Papadavid, Evangelia, Pimpinelli, Nicola, Quaglino, Pietro, Ranki, Annamari, Scarisbrick, Julia, Stadler, Rudolf, Väkevä, Liisa, Vermeer, Maarten H., Whittaker, Sean, Willemze, Rein, Knobler, Robert·2017·European Journal of Cancer

Abstract

In order to provide a common standard for the treatment of mycosis fungoides (MF) and Sézary syndrome (SS), the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Cutaneous Lymphoma Task Force (EORTC-CLTF) published in 2006 its consensus recommendations for the stage-adapted selection of management options for these neoplasms. Since then, the understanding of the pathophysiology and epidemiology of MF/SS has advanced, the staging system has been revised, new outcome data have been published and novel treatment options have been introduced. The purpose of the present document is to update the original recommendations bearing in mind that there are still only a limited number of controlled studies to support treatment decisions for MF/SS and that often treatment is determined by institutional experience and availability. This consensus on treatment recommendations was established among the authors through a series of consecutive consultations in writing and a round of discussion. Recommended treatment options are presented according to disease stage, whenever possible categorised into first- and second-line options and supported with levels of evidence as devised by the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (OCEBM). Skin-directed therapies are still the most appropriate option for early-stage MF, and most patients can look forward to a normal life expectancy. For patients with advanced disease, prognosis is still grim, and only for a highly selected subset of patients, prolonged survival can be achieved with allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT). There is a high need for the development and investigation in controlled clinical trials of treatment options that are based on our increasing understanding of the molecular pathology of MF/SS.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.02.027

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 452

Metadata

Authors
Trautinger, F., Eder, J., Assaf, C., Bagot, M., Cozzio, A., Dummer, R., Gniadecki, R., Klemke, C.-D., Ortiz-Romero, P. L., Papadavid, E., Pimpinelli, N., Quaglino, P., Ranki, A., Scarisbrick, J., Stadler, R., Väkevä, L., Vermeer, M. H., Whittaker, S., Willemze, R., & Knobler, R.
Venue
European Journal of Cancer
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-05
Volume
77
Pages
57-74
ISSN
0959-8049 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2601178524
Cited by
452
References
3
FWCI
47.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer consensus recommendations for the treatment of mycosis fungoides/Sézary syndrome – Update 2017. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ejca.2017.02.027
The paper
Trautinger, F., Eder, J., Assaf, C., Bagot, M., Cozzio, A., Dummer, R., Gniadecki, R., Klemke, C.-D., Ortiz-Romero, P. L., Papadavid, E., Pimpinelli, N., Quaglino, P., Ranki, A., Scarisbrick, J., Stadler, R., Väkevä, L., Vermeer, M. H., Whittaker, S., Willemze, R., & Knobler, R. (2017). European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer consensus recommendations for the treatment of mycosis fungoides/Sézary syndrome – Update 2017. European Journal of Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2017.02.027

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.