The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Vismodegib in patients with advanced basal cell carcinoma: Primary analysis of STEVIE, an international, open-label trial
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The SafeTy Events in VIsmodEgib study (STEVIE, ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01367665), assessed safety and efficacy of vismodegib-a first-in-class Hedgehog pathway inhibitor demonstrating clinical benefit in advanced basal cell carcinoma (BCC)-in a patient population representative of clinical practice. Primary analysis data are presented. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with locally advanced or metastatic BCC received oral vismodegib 150 mg/d until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal. Primary objective was safety. Efficacy variables were assessed as secondary end-points. RESULTS: Evaluable adult patients (N = 1215, 1119 locally advanced; 96 metastatic BCC) from 36 countries were treated; 147 patients (12%) remained on study at time of reporting. Median (range) treatment duration was 8.6 (0-44) months. Most patients (98%) had ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE). The incidence of the most common TEAEs was consistent with reports in previous analyses. No association between creatine phosphokinase (CPK) abnormalities and muscle spasm was observed. Serious TEAEs occurred in 289 patients (23.8%). Exposure ≥12 months did not lead to increased incidence or severity of new TEAEs. The majority of the most common TEAEs ongoing at time of treatment discontinuation resolved by 12 months afterwards, regardless of Gorlin syndrome status. Response rates (investigator-assessed) in patients with histologically confirmed measurable baseline disease were 68.5% (95% confidence interval (CI) 65.7-71.3) in patients with locally advanced BCC and 36.9% (95% CI 26.6-48.1) in patients with metastatic BCC. CONCLUSIONS: The primary analysis of STEVIE demonstrates that vismodegib is tolerable in typical patients in clinical practice; safety profile is consistent with that in previous reports. Long-term exposure was not associated with worsening severity/frequency of TEAEs. Investigator-assessed response rates showed high rate of tumour control. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT01367665.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Role of the Extracellular Matrix in Cancer Stemness
Nallanthighal, S., Heiserman, J. P., & Cheon, D.-J. (2019) · Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.3389/fcell.2019.00086 · Cited by 344
Peris, K., Fargnoli, M. C., Kaufmann, R., Arenberger, P., Bastholt, L., Seguin, N. B., Bataille, V., Brochez, L., del Marmol, V., Dummer, R., et al. (2023) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2023.113254 · Cited by 308
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Basset-Séguin, N., Hauschild, A., Kunstfeld, R., Grob, J., Dréno, B., Mortier, L., Ascierto, P. A., Licitra, L., Dutriaux, C., Thomas, L., Meyer, N., Guillot, B., Dummer, R., Arenberger, P., Fife, K., Raimundo, A., Dika, E., Dimier, N., Fittipaldo, A., Xynos, I., & Hansson, J.
- Venue
- European Journal of Cancer
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-11
- Volume
- 86
- Pages
- 334-348
- ISSN
- 0959-8049 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2767119969
- Cited by
- 286
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.