Cited by 51Heart Failure Treatment and ManagementCardiac Health and Mental HealthHeart rate and cardiovascular health

Symptom variability, not severity, predicts rehospitalization and mortality in patients with heart failure

Open access
Moser, Debra K., Frazier, Susan K., Worrall-Carter, Linda, Biddle, Martha J., Chung, Misook L., Lee, Kyoung Suk, Lennie, Terry A.·2011·European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Inability of heart failure (HF) patients to recognize worsening symptoms that herald an exacerbation is a common reason for HF readmissions. AIMS: To examine the relationship between patterns of HF symptom variability, and HF event-free survival. METHODS: Patients with HF (N=71) rated HF symptoms daily for 30 days. Symptoms were rated on a 10 point scale anchored at the extreme ends by "worst symptom could be" and "best symptom could be". Patients were followed for an average of 1 year to track HF and cardiac rehospitalizations and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Cox regression comparing event-free survival between patients who had highly variable symptom ratings across the 30-days and those whose symptoms were less variable revealed worse event-free survival in patients with more variable symptoms of shortness of breath or edema. Symptom variability predicted event-free survival independently of severity of symptoms, ejection fraction, comorbidities, age and gender. Symptom severity did not predict rehospitalization or mortality. CONCLUSION: Regardless of symptom severity, patients whose symptoms fluctuated in an improving and worsening pattern were at substantially greater risk for poorer event-free survival. These patients may become accustomed to this pattern such that they expect symptoms to improve and thus do not seek treatment with worsening symptoms.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ejcnurse.2010.05.006

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prioritizing symptom management in clinics could reduce hospital readmissions and reduce the costs of care.

    “Prioritizing symptom management in clinics could reduce hospital readmissions and reduce the costs of care. 1 , 20”

    From Prioritizing symptom management in the treatment of chronic heart failure (2020) · cites this paper as [20]

    The introductory text following the Abstract conclusion (page unavailable) says that hospitalizations account for most heart-failure care costs and that failure to recognize or respond to worsening symptoms commonly contributes to preventable rehospitalizations. The Discussion (page unavailable) calls for helping patients interpret and respond to symptoms, but the paper does not evaluate whether prioritizing symptom management in clinics reduces readmissions or costs. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moser, D. K., Frazier, S. K., Worrall-Carter, L., Biddle, M. J., Chung, M. L., Lee, K. S., & Lennie, T. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Kentucky (US)
  • Curtin University, Melbourne, Australia
Corresponding author
Moser, Debra K.
Venue
European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing
Published
2011-06
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
124-129
ISSN
  • 1474-5151 (ISSN-L)
  • 1873-1953
OpenAlex
W1963711423
Cited by
51
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Nursing Research (P20NR010679)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart rate and cardiovascular health
Keywords
heart failure, symptom variability, symptom severity, hospital readmission, mortality, event-free survival, dyspnea, edema, symptom monitoring
MeSH terms
Aged, Female, Heart Failure, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Patient Readmission, Risk Factors, Severity of Illness Index, Survival Rate, Disease-Free Survival

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review